Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT05579197

Myosuit Chronic Stroke Protocol

A stroke is a vascular condition that can suddenly cause the loss of neurological functions. The disability derived from a stroke can imply reduced communication and limited activities of daily living in the long term.

Thus, specifically walking rehabilitation is crucial in order to restore the lower limbs' function and to re-establish the social participation of patients.

Robotics has been demonstrated in being a suitable and effective tool in order to assist and treat post-stroke patients, thanks to its capability to deliver intensive and task-oriented training. Specifically, the exosuits, are a sub-group of robotics devices designed in lighter materials that assist the patients by actively moving the hip, knee or ankle.

Given this framework, the aim of this work is to conduct a pilot study on the usability and perceived effectiveness of a lower-limb exosuit, the Myosuit device, on post-stroke patients. The secondary aims of the study concern the evaluation of the functional performances of the patients both with and without the device and before and after the treatment.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

IRCCS Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi onlus

Florence, 50143, Italy

About this study

A stroke, either ischemic or haemorrhagic, is a vascular condition that can suddenly cause the loss of neurological functions [1]. The disability derived from a stroke can imply reduced communication and limited activities of daily living in the long term. Specifically, reduced mobility and equilibrium, walking asymmetry and spasticity of the impaired limb are the principal factors related to long-term limited physical activity and moderate dependency of the patient on the caregiver [2,3]. A walking deficit can have severe consequences on the energetic cost and the risk of falling, as well as on the participation and personal identity of the person [4].

Moreover, another psychological area that can be affected is self-efficacy, defined as the individual capabilities to take actions for obtaining results. Hence, for a person affected by stroke, self-efficacy is crucial and connected to his/her adaptation to the new condition [5].

For these reasons, walking rehabilitation is essential to recover lower limbs' function, restore self-efficacy and re-establish the social participation of patients [6].

Robotics has been demonstrated in being a suitable and effective tool in order to assist and treat post-stroke patients [7], thanks to its capability to deliver intensive and task-oriented training. One of the most common modalities to classify robotics devices is according to their structure, and the modality to interface with the patients. In these regards, we can distinguish between exoskeletons and end-effector robots, given their characteristics to wear the patient and guide him/her through the distal handle of the mechanical chain, respectively. Moreover, among the exoskeletons, the exosuits are a sub-group of robotics devices designed in lighter materials and that assist the patients by actively moving the hip, knee or ankle.

The lightweight of exosuits makes them suitable both for ecological and therapy-related settings, as well as assistance applications. It is also worth noticing that the absence of a rigid structure requires the patients to have an active component in the walking activity. Previous studies highlighted how these devices can have a supportive capacity during the propulsion phases of gait, assisting the patients throughout the walk [8].

The Myosuit device is a wearable exosuit capable to provide assistance during the walk, sit to stand transition and stair climb [9]. Its assistance is provided with an exo-tendon mechanism. More in detail, online analysis of inertial signals allows to segment the gait phases and to assist at the extension of the knee and hip [9].

Many previous studies show promising results in the deambulation of spinal cord injuries or patients with lower-limb disorders [9,10]. These results were evaluated both in terms of kinematics and the safety of the patients. However, the studies conducted to highlight the urgency for the validation of the device in bigger and different cohorts [9,10].

Given this framework, the aim of this work is to conduct a pilot study on the effects of a lower-limb exosuit, the Myosuit device, on post-stroke patients. The effects of the device will be analysed in terms of usability of the device, self-efficacy, and functional parameters of gait.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Clinical stability, evaluated through the administration of the MEWS scale (Modified Early Warning Score);
  • To be able to stand up from a chair without exceeding a trunk angle of 45° to the left or right during the movement;
  • To be able to walk for 10 m without the support of another person but, if necessary, with conventional aids different than knee othesis (e.g. stick, crutch, ankle/foot orthesis). The aid considered should have single-support;
  • Height between 150 cm and 195 cm;
  • Weight between 45 kg and 110 kg;
  • FAC (Functional Ambulation Calssification) ≥3;
  • MAS (Modified Ashworth Scale) ≤2;
  • HADS (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale) with normative values (>10/21 for each scale);
  • MoCA (Montreal Cognitive Assessment) (Equivalent scoring > 1 with the Italian correction from Santangelo et al._ 2015);
  • To be able to understand and sign the informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

  • Presence of an active (or with effects) neurological or psychiatric pathology occurred before the vascular event;
  • Severe bilateral hearing or sight loss;
  • Functional Reach Test <15.24;
  • Flexion retruction of hip and knee greater than 10° and not reducible;
  • Presence of genu varum or geru valgum greater than 10°;
  • Pregnancy;
  • Previous stroke.

Treatment and study plan

Lower-limb robotic intervention

Device

The intervention proposed in this study involves the use of an exosuit for lower limbs, the Myosuit. The selection of the tasks has been done in order to replicate typical activities of daily living in a structured environment, i.e. a rehabilitation hospital.

Specifically, the tasks involve walking, sit to stand, balance and stair climbing.

During the phases of assessment (session 2 and session 10), other devices are be used. Specifically:

  • The Optogait system; for a markerless gait analysis;
  • The Gyko sensor; an inertial sensor that will be used at the beginning of the training for the synchronisation of the signals recorded by the Myosuit and the signal recorded by the Optogait.

Finally, during all the sessions, the Polar heart rate sensor is used to constantly monitor the cardiac frequency of the patients.

Primary outcomes

  1. Usability of the device

    Time frame: Evaluated at session 10 (after the treatment) at an average of 3 weeks

    System Usability Scale (SUS) Range: 0-100, with 100 corresponding to the highest degree of usability

  2. Self-efficacy

    Time frame: Evaluated at session 10 (after the treatment), at an average of 3 weeks

    Stroke Self-Efficacy Questionnaire (SSEQ-10) Range: 0-39; with 39 corresponding to the maximum confidence of the patient in self-efficacy

Secondary outcomes

  1. Variation of functional status after the treatment

    Time frame: Evaluated at session 1 (before the beginning of the treatment) and at session 10 (after the treatment) without the device

    Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) Range: 0-12; with 12 corresponding to the best perfromance on balance, walking, and sit-to-stand tasks

  2. Functional assistive direct effect of the device

    Time frame: Evaluated at session 1 (before the beginning of the treatment) with and without the device

    Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) Range: 0-12; with 12 corresponding to the best perfromance on balance, walking, and sit-to-stand tasks

  3. Variation of walking capabilities after the treatment

    Time frame: Evaluated at session 1 (before the beginning of the treatment) and at session 10 (after the treatment) without the device

    Distance walked during the Two Minutes Walking Test (2minWT), in meters

    Range: Not available; higher distances represent better performances on the walking task

  4. Assistive direct effect of the device on walking capabilities

    Time frame: Evaluated at session 1 (before the beginning of the treatment) with and without the device

    Distance walked during the Two Minutes Walking Test (2minWT), in meters

    Range: Not available; higher distances represent better performances on the walking task

  5. Variation of walking capabilities after the treatment

    Time frame: Evaluated at session 1 (before the beginning of the treatment) and at session 10 (after the treatment) without the device

    Time needed to execute the 10 Meters Walk Test (10mWT), in seconds

    Range: Not available; higher durations represent worst performances on the walking task

  6. Assistive direct effect of the device on walking capabilities

    Time frame: Evaluated at session 1 (before the beginning of the treatment) with and without the device

    Time needed to execute the 10 Meters Walk Test (10mWT), in seconds

    Range: Not available; higher durations represent worst performances on the walking task

  7. Variation of stair ascending and descending capabilities after the treatment

    Time frame: Evaluated at session 1 (before the beginning of the treatment) and at session 10 (after the treatment) without the device

    Time needed to execute the Stair Climb Test (SCT), in seconds

    Range: Not available; higher durations represent worst performances on the stair climb task

  8. Assistive direct effect of the device on stair ascending and descending capabilities

    Time frame: Evaluated at session 1 (before the beginning of the treatment) with and without the device

    Time needed to execute the Stair Climb Test (SCT), in seconds

    Range: Not available; higher durations represent worst performances on the stair climb task

  9. Variation of gait kinematic after the treatment

    Time frame: Evaluated at session 1 (before the beginning of the treatment) and at session 10 (after the treatment) without the device

    Spatio-temporal kinematic parameters extracted from the Optogait system, such as:

    • step length (meters)
    • stride length (meters)
    • stride time (seconds)
    • step time (seconds)
    • swing time (seconds)
    • cadence (steps/minute)
    • velocity (meters/seconds)
  10. Assistive direct effect of the device on gait kinematic

    Time frame: Evaluated at session 1 (before the beginning of the treatment) with and without the device

    Spatio-temporal kinematic parameters extracted from the Optogait system, such as:

    • step length (meters)
    • stride length (meters)
    • stride time (seconds)
    • step time (seconds)
    • swing time (seconds)
    • cadence (steps/minute)
    • velocity (meters/seconds)

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi ETS

Other

Collaborators

  • MyoSwiss AG

Registry information

Official study title

Valutazione Degli Effetti di un Dispositivo Indossabile Per Arto Inferiore (Myosuit) Sulla accettabilità e Parametri Funzionali di Pazienti Cronici Post-ictus: Studio Pilota.

Acronym: MyoSCSP

Important dates

Study start
2022
Primary completion
2023
Study completion
2023
First posted
Oct 13, 2022
Registry last updated
Feb 20, 2024

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.