University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz
Mainz, Rhineland-Palatinate, 55131, Germany
NCT Number: NCT04940312
The MyoMobile study is a single-center, randomized, controlled three-armed cohort study with prospective data collection to investigate the effect of a personalized mobile health intervention compared to usual care on the physical activity levels in patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me45 year and older
All sexes
Observational
Mainz, Rhineland-Palatinate, 55131, Germany
Heart failure (HF) affects more than 15 million people in Europe and represents the leading cause of hospitalization. The prevalence of HF is increasing, which has been attributed to an ageing population with subsequently higher prevalence of predisposing risk factors (e.g. arterial hypertension, type-2-diabetes, obesity), a better survival, and more effective treatment of precursors (e.g. myocardial infarction). In the community, heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is the most common HF phenotype. Currently, the benefit of medical therapies is limited to patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) only, whereas no specific medical therapy is currently approved for patients with HFpEF.
In HF patients, physical inactivity and a sedentary lifestyle lead to disease progression and increased mortality, and an increase of physical activity is positively correlated with improved outcome. Guidelines from the Heart Failure Society of America recommend at least 30 minutes of moderate-intensity activity for ≥ 5 days/week (i.e. at least 150 min/week). Unfortunately, exercise recommendations are poorly implemented in daily clinical practice and even patients enrolled in supervised exercise training programs have been reported to show low adherence.
The MyoMobile study has been designed to assess the effect of a 12-week, app-based coaching program on physical activity in patients with HFpEF. Physical activity including daily step count will be assessed by accelerometry and, in addition, a pedometer will be used to measure the daily step count and provide direct feedback to the patient. Accelerometers provide an objective and continuous assessment of physical activity during patients' daily life over longer periods and may therefore reflect the true effect of the activity coaching intervention on physical activity more accurately than intermittent supervised exercise tests such as the six minute walk test. These efforts are complemented by a comprehensive (sub)clinical and molecular characterization of HFpEF patients at baseline and after the follow-up period of 12 weeks. In order to evaluate the potential effect of awareness for physical activity and of surveillance, due to participants wearing a pedometer throughout the study period, two intervention groups will be investigated. This will allow for the effect of an individualized, app-based coaching intervention, compared to standard care in patients with HFpEF, to be deciphered.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Individualized app-based coaching via a smartphone
no Intervention
pedometer-based tracking of physical activity
Time frame: 12 weeks
The primary efficacy endpoint is the change in average daily step count between the baseline phase (mean of data collected during the period prior to randomization) and the end of the intervention (mean of data collected during week 12) comparing standard care to a 12-week individualized app-based activity coaching
Time frame: 12 weeks
Difference in E/E' ratio (change from baseline (V1) to 12-week follow-up (V4))
Time frame: 12 weeks
Difference in LVEF (systolic function) from baseline to 12-week follow-up
Time frame: 12 weeks
Difference in quality of life from baseline to 12-week follow-up (measured with The Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ))
Time frame: 12 weeks
Difference in HRV from baseline to 12-week follow-up (measured with 24-hour Holter ECG)
Time frame: 12 weeks
Difference in peak VO2 from baseline to 12-week follow-up (cardiopulmonary exercise testing)
Time frame: 12 weeks
Change in daily non-sedentary daytime activity from baseline to 12-week follow-up (composite measure of movement and locomotion as measured by the Dynaport MoveMonitor) (V4)
Time frame: 12 weeks
Change in gait speed from baseline to 12-week follow-up
Time frame: 12 weeks
Difference in the serum concentration of N-terminal brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) from baseline to 12-week follow-up
Time frame: 12 weeks
Difference in forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) from baseline to 12-week follow-up
Time frame: 12 weeks
Difference in the augmentation index from baseline to 12-week follow-up. The augmentation index is an indicator of arterial stiffness; higher values indicate a worse outcome
Time frame: 12 weeks
Correlations of gait speed during an intermittent supervised test to data assessed in patients' home environment
Time frame: 12 weeks
Change in metabolic equivalents (METs) from baseline to 12-week follow-up
Time frame: 12 weeks
Difference in daily step count from baseline to end of study (comparing the two intervention groups only)
Time frame: 6 weeks
Difference in biomarkers of autonomic function from baseline to 6-week follow-up (e.g. heart rate variability)
Time frame: 12 weeks
Difference in biomarkers of autonomic function from baseline to 12-week follow-up (e.g. heart rate variability)
Time frame: 6 weeks
Difference in biomarkers of heart failure from baseline to 6-week follow-up (e.g., NT-proBNP)
Time frame: 12 weeks
Difference in biomarkers of heart failure from baseline to 12-week follow-up (e.g., NT-proBNP)
Time frame: 6 weeks
Difference in biomarkers of cardiovascular diseases from baseline to 6-week follow-up (e.g., troponin)
Time frame: 12 weeks
Difference in biomarkers of cardiovascular diseases from baseline to 12-week follow-up (e.g., troponin)
Time frame: 6 weeks
Difference in biomarkers of metabolic diseases from baseline to 6-week follow-up (e.g., HbA1c)
Time frame: 12 weeks
Difference in biomarkers of metabolic diseases from baseline to 12-week follow-up (e.g., HbA1c)
Time frame: 6 weeks
Difference in biomarkers of renal diseases from baseline to 6-week follow-up (e.g., eGFR)
Time frame: 12 weeks
Difference in biomarkers of renal diseases from baseline to 12-week follow-up (e.g., eGFR)
Time frame: 6 weeks
Difference in biomarkers of cancer from baseline to 6-week follow-up (e.g., LDH)
Time frame: 12 weeks
Difference in biomarkers of cancer from baseline to 12-week follow-up (e.g., LDH)
Time frame: 6 weeks
Difference in biomarkers of pulmonary diseases from baseline to 6-week follow-up (e.g., FEV1)
Time frame: 12 weeks
Difference in biomarkers of pulmonary diseases from baseline to 12-week follow-up (e.g., FEV1)
Time frame: 6 weeks
Difference in biomarkers of inflammation from baseline to 6-week follow-up (e.g., C-reactive protein)
Time frame: 12 weeks
Difference in biomarkers of inflammation from baseline to 12-week follow-up (e.g., C-reactive protein)
Time frame: 6 weeks
Difference in biomarkers of immunity from baseline to 6-week follow-up (e.g., leukocytes)
Time frame: 12 weeks
Difference in biomarkers of immunity from baseline to 12-week follow-up (e.g., leukocytes)
Time frame: 6 weeks
Difference in biomarkers of oxidative stress from baseline to 6-week follow-up (e.g., monocytes)
Time frame: 12 weeks
Difference in biomarkers of oxidative stress from baseline to 12-week follow-up (e.g., monoytes)
Time frame: 6 weeks
Difference in biomarkers of hypercoagulability from baseline to 6-week follow-up (e.g. mean platelet volume)
Time frame: 12 weeks
Difference in biomarkers of hypercoagulability from baseline to 12-week follow-up (e.g., mean platelet volume)
Time frame: 6 weeks
Difference in biomarkers of vascular/endothelial function from baseline to 6-week follow-up (e.g. pulse-wave velocity)
Time frame: 12 weeks
Difference in biomarkers of vascular/endothelial function from baseline to 12-week follow-up (e.g. pulse-wave velocity)
Time frame: 6 weeks
Difference in biomarkers of carotid atherosclerosis from baseline to 6-week follow-up (e.g., intima-media-thickness)
Time frame: 12 weeks
Difference in biomarkers of carotid atherosclerosis from baseline to 12-week follow-up (e.g., intima-media-thickness)
Time frame: 6 weeks
Difference in biomarkers of methylation from baseline to 6-week follow-up (e.g., CpG methylation)
Time frame: 12 weeks
Difference in biomarkers of methylation from baseline to 12-week follow-up (e.g., CpG methylation)
Time frame: 6 weeks
Difference in anthropometrics from baseline to 6-week follow-up (e.g., BMI)
Time frame: 12 weeks
Difference in anthropometrics from baseline to 12-week follow-up (e.g., BMI)
Time frame: 12 weeks
Difference in biomarkers of psychosomatic diseases from baseline to 12-week follow-up (e.g, PHQ-9)
Time frame: 12 weeks
Difference in biomarkers of physical activity (e.g., step count)
Time frame: 12 weeks
Difference in biomarkers of sedentary daytime activities (e.g., sleeping time)
Time frame: 12 weeks
Differences in accelerometry (e.g., measured with the Dynaport MoveMonitor)
Time frame: 12 weeks
Explorative evaluation of compliance as assessed with technical data from the mobile devices (e.g. wearing time) and a qualitative questionnaire on device experience (allowing to evaluate inter alia feasibility and wearability)
Time frame: 12 weeks
Explorative evaluation of device functionality (e.g., as measured by number of data points per observation period)
Time frame: 12 weeks
Explorative evaluation of realibility of mobile device measurements (e.g. by comparing systolic blood pressure measurements between mobile devices and routine measurements)
Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz
Other
A Randomized Study to Investigate the Effects of Individualized App-based Coaching on Physical Activity and Myocardial and Vascular Function of Patients with Heart Failure and Preserved Ejection Fraction Compared to Standard Care
Acronym: MyoMobile
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05752760
Cardiovascular Diseases, Heart Diseases
Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07332520
Cardiovascular Diseases, Heart Diseases
View Trial DetailsNCT03387813
Cardiovascular Diseases, Heart Diseases
Phoenix, Arizona, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT04145635
Cardio-Renal Syndrome, Cardiorenal Syndrome
Los Angeles, California, United States
View Trial Details