Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT05885698

MYLUNG Consortium Part 3: Observational Study

This longitudinal study looks to quantify the testing timeline, operational barriers, and outcomes of biomarker-guided therapy in a large, community-based, and largely unselected patient population with early stage and advanced stage, treatment-naive non-small cell lung cancer, whether squamous or non-squamous.

Recruiting

Interested in participating?

Request Info

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Observational

Primary location

Southern Cancer Center, PC, Daphne, Alabama, United States

Loading trial locations.

About this study

Lung cancer remains the most lethal malignancy in men and women in the U.S. Providing high quality management of these patients in the community setting as compared to hospital or academic centers offers the opportunity to reduce cost without sacrificing clinical outcome and simultaneously improving patient convenience and value. Many patients diagnosed with late-stage cancers can benefit from advanced biomarker testing, yet not all eligible patients receive this type of diagnostic testing today.

Within advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (aNSCLC), there are many specific somatic mutations observed in select patient populations that have targeted highly effective and less toxic therapies. National guidelines have advocated for broad tumor molecular profiling as a part of the standard diagnostic evaluation for aNSCLC, with the goal of identifying driver mutations for which effective therapies or clinical trials are available.

Furthermore, there is emerging evidence that molecular testing can impact treatment choices in earlier stages of lung cancer. However, adherence to genomic testing guidelines presents unique challenges to community oncologists. While most oncology clinical research has been conducted at well-established academic medical centers, over 85% of cancer patients are diagnosed and treated at local, community-based clinical practices. Barriers exist in the ability to order these tests efficiently, in a timely manner, and reimbursed accordingly. Furthermore, patient care can vary drastically based on community-associated disparities.

This longitudinal clinical trial will generate Real World Evidence (RWE) to validate efficacy of first treatment regimen in newly diagnosed patients with non-small cell lung cancer. The MYLUNG Program integrates three separate protocols: Protocol #1 interrogated historical data from a large number of practices seeing lung cancer patients to evaluate biomarker testing, decision making patterns, the patient journey, and the tissue journey; Protocol #2 prospectively evaluated the patient journey in a limited number of index practices focused on testing; integration of testing results; and treatments. Interventional strategies to optimize these objectives will be developed and integrated into various interventions all aimed at improving biomarker testing rates. Protocol #3 (22285) will serve as a resource to monitor the impact of these strategies on the patient journey as it relates to shared decision making, and will continue to prospectively evaluate the patient journey in a limited number of index practices focused on testing, integration of testing results and treatments.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Adult subjects (18 years and older) with newly diagnosed early stage, locally advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer
  • Must be eligible for systemic therapy based on the treating provider's assessment. If systemic therapy was recommended and documented by the treating provider but the patient declined, they can still be eligible for the study. Patients can be enrolled prior to start of treatment.
  • Subjects who developed locally advanced or metastatic disease after receiving adjuvant or neoadjuvant therapy are eligible if the adjuvant/neoadjuvant therapy was completed at least 12 months prior to the development of locally advanced or metastatic disease
  • Subjects must be enrolled within 30 days of initiation of systemic therapy
  • Signed informed consent

Exclusion criteria

  • Stage IA at the time of enrollment
  • Subjects with small cell lung cancer
  • Subjects with Unknown primary tumor origin

Treatment and study plan

Primary outcomes

  1. Proportion of Patients Who Receive Biomarker Test Results Prior to Systemic Therapy or Death

    Time frame: 5 years from date of enrollment into study

  2. Proportion of Patients Who Receive Single-gene Testing Compared to Those that Receive Comprehensive Biomarker Testing

    Time frame: 5 years from date of enrollment into study

    Comprehensive biomarker testing is defined as both PD-L1 testing to guide the use of immunotherapies and testing for all genomic alterations for which there are FDA-approved therapies including (but not limited to) EGFR, ALK, ROS1, BRAF, NTRK, RET, KRAS and MET.

  3. For Patients without Biomarker Test Results, List Reasons for Not Conducting Testing

    Time frame: 5 years from date of enrollment into study

    • Clinical deterioration, clinical crisis
    • Tissue: obtaining sample, tissue retrieval
    • Assay failure for 1 or more biomarkers: Quantity Not Sufficient (QNS), Quality Assurance (QA) fail, test failure
    • Patient/provider attitudes & perceptions
    • Provider knowledge about testing options
    • Patient knowledge about biomarker testing
    • Payor Coverage: prior authorization denial, payor refusal
    • Financial barriers: uncovered costs, reimbursement

Secondary outcomes

  1. Proportion of patients placed on biomarker-directed first treatment regimen vs those who were not

    Time frame: 5 years from date of enrollment into study

  2. Time span between first systemic therapy as compared to date of initial presentation, date of diagnostic biopsy, date of first visit to a medical oncologist, and date of biomarker test order(s) and result(s).

    Time frame: 5 years from date of enrollment into study

  3. For Patients who Receive Comprehensive Biomarker Testing, list Types of Test Ordered

    Time frame: 5 years from date of enrollment into study

  4. For Patients without Biomarker-Directed First Treatment Regimen, Catalog Reasons for Not Prescribing Biomarker-Targeted Therapy

    Time frame: 5 years from date of enrollment into study

    For patients who have received biomarker test results with at least one actionable mutation, catalog the reason for not prescribing biomarker-targeted therapy.

    • Lack of availability or delays in obtaining targeted therapy
    • Misinterpretation of test results
    • Clinical contraindications (allergies, end organ dysfunction, active autoimmune disease, etc.)
    • Patient/provider attitudes and perceptions
    • Financial barriers / Uncovered costs
    • Patient performance status
  5. For Patients who Receive Comprehensive Biomarker Testing, list Types of Resulting Treatment Regimen Assigned

    Time frame: 5 years from date of enrollment into study

  6. Characteristics of Cancer Care Practices: Number of Geographic Clinical Locations Per Practice

    Time frame: 5 years from date of enrollment into study

  7. Characteristics of Cancer Care Practices: Rural Setting vs Urban Setting at each Practice

    Time frame: 5 years from date of enrollment into study

  8. Characteristics of Cancer Care Practices: Number of Staff per Practice

    Time frame: 5 years from date of enrollment into study

  9. Characteristics of Cancer Care Practices: Patient Volume per Practice

    Time frame: 5 years from date of enrollment into study

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Andrea Glidden, BSN, OCN

CONTACT

[email protected]

630-728-5493

Taqi Mohammad

CONTACT

[email protected]

281-863-6439

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

US Oncology Research

Industry

Registry information

Official study title

Molecularly Informed Lung Cancer Treatment in a Community Cancer Network: A Longitudinal Prospective RWE Study (MYLUNG Consortium Part 3: Observational Study)

Acronym: MYLUNG

Important dates

Study start
2023
Primary completion
2030
Study completion
2030
First posted
Jun 2, 2023
Registry last updated
May 18, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.