Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT05785065

Mycophenolate Mofetil in Systemic Sclerosis With Subclinical Interstitial Lung Disease

The goal of this pilot study is to assess the feasibility of a larger study on the efficacy of mycophenolate mofetil in people diagnosed with systemic sclerosis with mild lung involvement. Participants will be recruited over 12 months at 3 academic centers and assigned randomly to receive either mycophenolate mofetil or placebo, a look-alike substance that contains no active drug, for 96 weeks.

Recruiting

Interested in participating?

Request Info

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 2

Primary location

Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM), Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Loading trial locations.

About this study

Background: Systemic sclerosis (SSc, scleroderma) is a rare but life-threatening systemic autoimmune disease characterized by microvasculopathy, serum autoantibodies, inflammation and fibrosis of the skin and internal organs. Early rapidly progressive SSc remains the most lethal autoimmune rheumatic disease, with over 60% mortality at 5 years in high-risk patients. Interstitial lung disease (ILD) is the leading cause of SSc-related mortality and affects over half of SSc patients. SSc-ILD is currently treated with immunosuppressive and anti-fibrotic drugs, with the first-line treatment being mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), although treatments have modest benefits when initiated in advanced stages of disease. Emerging data suggest that earlier treatment, when lung function is still normal despite evidence of ILD on computed tomography scan ("subclinical SSc-ILD"), may lead to improved outcomes, suggesting a window of treatment opportunity.

Research Aims: The goal of the proposed pilot RCT is to establish the feasibility of a phase III RCT that will assess the efficacy of MMF in subclinical SSc-ILD. Specifically, we aim to:

  • Determine the rate of patient recruitment at three centers over one year, and identify barriers and solutions to recruitment;
  • Determine the proportion of participants receiving the allocated treatment and with complete primary efficacy outcome data at 48 and 96 weeks; and
  • Generate preliminary data on clinical efficacy outcomes that will contribute information to the analysis of the phase III trial through a Bayesian inference framework.

Methods: Participants will be adults with SSc, ILD diagnosed within the past 3 years and a normal forced vital capacity (≥ 80%). Participants will be recruited over 12 months at 3 academic centers affiliated to the Canadian Scleroderma Research Group. Eligible participants will be assigned using stratified randomization to receive either MMF (up to 2 grams daily) or placebo for 96 weeks. The primary feasibility outcome will be the rate of recruitment per site over 12 months. A Bayesian approach will be used to estimate the probability of reaching the target sample size based on observed recruitment rates, with decision rules to continue, adapt, or stop the trial. Data collected on the primary clinical efficacy outcome (annual rate of decline in forced vital capacity over 96 weeks) will be used to inform the analysis of the phase III trial (as an informative prior) through a Bayesian inference framework.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Able and willing to provide informed consent and adhere to study protocol;
  • Women and men of all race/ethnicity, aged 18 years and older;
  • SSc based on 2013 ACR-EULAR classification criteria;
  • Presence of interstitial lung disease on HRCT scan, obtained within 12 months before screening, that shows fibrosis affecting less than 20% of the lungs, as confirmed by an expert radiologist;
  • Diagnosis of ILD within 7 years before screening;
  • Forced vital capacity of 80% predicted and above, on pulmonary function tests obtained within 6 months before screening;
  • Able to communicate in French or English;

Exclusion criteria

  • Progressive pulmonary fibrosis, defined as at least two of three criteria (worsening symptoms, radiological progression, and physiological progression) occurring within the past year with no alternative explanation, as defined by the 2022 ATS/ERS/JRS/ALAT Clinical Practice Guideline;
  • Use of medications with putative lung disease-modifying properties:
  • Current use of MMF, mycophenolic acid, azathioprine, calcineurin inhibitors (e.g. tacrolimus, cyclosporin A), tocilizumab, nintedanib, pirfenidone or corticosteroids (Prednisone equivalent dose >10 mg/day) at time of screening
  • Cyclophosphamide within one year prior to screening
  • Rituximab within 6 months prior to screening
  • Cell therapies (including stem cell transplantation) within one year prior to screening
  • Current use of other biological, targeted synthetic or investigational products with immunosuppressive effects (e.g. TNF inhibitors, abatacept, tofacitinib) at time of screening
  • Any contraindication to MMF, including:
  • Pregnancy and/or breastfeeding
  • Female of childbearing potential not using reliable method of contraception
  • Persistent leucopenia (white blood cell count <3.0 x103/μL)
  • Persistent thrombocytopenia (platelet count <100 x103/μL)
  • Persistent anemia (hemoglobin <100 g/L)
  • Baseline liver enzymes (alanine transaminase (ALT) or aspartate transaminase (AST)) or bilirubin >1.5 times the upper limit of normal, other than due to Gilbert's disease
  • Uncontrolled congestive heart failure
  • Active infection (lung or elsewhere)
  • Active solid or hematological malignancy (other than basal cell cancer of the skin or cervical carcinoma in situ removed entirely by biopsy)
  • Active peptic ulcer disease
  • Other serious concomitant medical illness, unreliability or drug abuse that might compromise the patient's ability to safely take MMF
  • Use of drugs or products with significant interactions with MMF

Treatment and study plan

Mycophenolate mofetil

Drug

The participant will receive 500 mg to 1000 mg twice daily of mycophenolate mofetil administered orally for 96 weeks.

The dose scheduling will be as follow:

Weeks 1 and 2: 500 mg twice a day Weeks 3 and 4: 750 mg twice a day Weeks 5 to 96: 1000 mg twice a day

Placebo

Other

The participant will receive 500 mg to 1000 mg twice daily of placebo administered orally for 96 weeks.

The dose scheduling will be as follow:

Weeks 1 and 2: 500 mg twice a day Weeks 3 and 4: 750 mg twice a day Weeks 5 to 96: 1000 mg twice a day

Primary outcomes

  1. Total number of potentially eligible patients identified per site

    Time frame: Over one year

  2. Proportion of potentially eligible patients who provide consent per site

    Time frame: Over one year

  3. Proportion of consented participants who meet the eligibility criteria per site

    Time frame: Over one year

  4. Monthly rate of randomized participants per site

    Time frame: Over one year

  5. Adherence to treatment as assessed by Participant Dosing Diaries

    Time frame: From the first dose to the last dose taken for each participant, up to 96 weeks

  6. Drug adherence rate as assessed by Pharmacy Accountability Logs

    Time frame: From the first dose to the last dose taken for each participant, up to 96 weeks

  7. Adherence to the study protocol as assessed by the number of protocol deviations

    Time frame: Over total study period (up to 96 weeks per participant)

  8. Proportion of participants intolerant to the study drug who discontinue trial treatment

    Time frame: Over total study period (up to 96 weeks per participant)

  9. Proportion of participants receiving the allocated treatment at 48 weeks

    Time frame: At 48 weeks

  10. Proportion of participants receiving the allocated treatment at 96 weeks

    Time frame: At 96 weeks

  11. Proportion of participants with complete primary efficacy outcome data at 48 weeks

    Time frame: At 48 weeks

  12. Proportion of participants with complete primary efficacy outcome data at 96 weeks

    Time frame: At 96 weeks

  13. Proportion of participants lost to follow-up

    Time frame: Over total study period (up to 96 weeks per participant)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Frequency of treatment-related adverse events

    Time frame: Over total study period (up to 96 weeks per participant)

    Incidence and severity of AEs, with severity determined according to National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, Version 5.0 (NCI CTCAE v5.0)

Other outcomes

  1. Annual rate of decline in percent (%) predicted forced vital capacity (FVC) over 48 weeks

    Time frame: Over 48 weeks

  2. Annual rate of decline in percent (%) predicted forced vital capacity (FVC) over 96 weeks

    Time frame: Over 96 weeks

  3. Proportion of participants having clinically meaningful progression

    Time frame: Over total study period (up to 96 weeks per participant)

    Clinically meaningful progression defined by the Outcome Measures in Rheumatology (OMERACT) for connective tissue disease-associated interstitial lung diseases (CTD-ILD) (defined as a ≥10% relative decline in FVC from baseline, or a ≥5% to <10% relative decline in FVC associated with a ≥15% relative decline in diffusion capacity [DLCO])

  4. Time to clinically meaningful progression

    Time frame: Over total study period (up to 96 weeks per participant)

    Clinically meaningful progression as defined by Outcome Measures in Rheumatology (OMERACT) for connective tissue disease- associated interstitial lung diseases (CTD-ILD) (defined as a ≥10% relative decline in FVC from baseline, or a ≥5% to <10% relative decline in FVC associated with a ≥15% relative decline in diffusion capacity [DLCO])

  5. Proportion of participants having an absolute decrease in FVC of at least 3.3% predicted

    Time frame: Over total study period (up to 96 weeks per participant)

    An absolute decrease in FVC of at least 3.3% predicted was proposed as the minimal clinically important difference estimate for worsening of FVC in patients with SSc-ILD.

  6. Time to an absolute decrease in FVC of at least 3.3% predicted

    Time frame: Over total study period (up to 96 weeks per participant)

    An absolute decrease in FVC of at least 3.3% predicted was proposed as the minimal clinically important difference estimate for worsening of FVC in patients with SSc-ILD.

  7. Proportion of participants having progressive pulmonary fibrosis

    Time frame: Over total study period (up to 96 weeks per participant)

    Progressive pulmonary fibrosis defined by 2022 ATS/ERS/JRS/ALAT guidelines

  8. Time to progressive pulmonary fibrosis

    Time frame: Over total study period (up to 96 weeks per participant)

    Progressive pulmonary fibrosis defined by 2022 ATS/ERS/JRS/ALAT guidelines

  9. Annual rate of decline in percent (%) predicted total lung capacity over 48 weeks

    Time frame: Over 48 weeks

  10. Annual rate of decline in percent (%) predicted total lung capacity over 96 weeks

    Time frame: Over 96 weeks

  11. Annual rate of decline in percent (%) predicted diffusion capacity for carbon monoxide (DLCO) over 48 weeks

    Time frame: Over 48 weeks

  12. Annual rate of decline in percent (%) predicted DLCO over 96 weeks

    Time frame: Over 96 weeks

  13. Change from baseline in percent (%) extent of ILD, ground-glass opacities, reticular infiltrates and honeycombing, and in pulmonary vessel volume at 48 weeks

    Time frame: At 48 weeks

    Measured on high-resolution computed tomography chest scan using automated lung texture analysis

  14. Change from baseline in percent (%) extent of ILD, ground-glass opacities, reticular infiltrates and honeycombing, and in pulmonary vessel volume at 96 weeks

    Time frame: At 96 weeks

    Measured on high-resolution computed tomography chest scan using automated lung texture analysis

  15. Change from baseline in St-George Respiratory Questionnaire at 48 weeks

    Time frame: At 48 weeks

    Scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating more limitations.

  16. Change from baseline in St-George Respiratory Questionnaire at 96 weeks

    Time frame: At 96 weeks

    Scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating more limitations.

  17. Change from baseline in Leicester Cough Questionnaire at 48 weeks

    Time frame: At 48 weeks

    Scores (total) range from 3 to 21, with higher scores indicating less limitations.

  18. Change from baseline in Leicester Cough Questionnaire at 96 weeks

    Time frame: At 96 weeks

    Scores (total) range from 3 to 21, with higher scores indicating less limitations.

  19. Change from baseline in health assessment questionnaire modified for scleroderma at 48 weeks

    Time frame: At 48 weeks

    The SHAQ consists of the Health assessment questionnaire (HAQ) and visual analogue scales for pain, patient global assessment, vascular, digital ulcers, lung involvement and gastrointestinal involvement. Scores range from 0 to 3, with higher scores indicating more limitations.

  20. Change from baseline in health assessment questionnaire modified for scleroderma at 96 weeks

    Time frame: At 96 weeks

    The SHAQ consists of the Health assessment questionnaire (HAQ) and visual analogue scales for pain, patient global assessment, vascular, digital ulcers, lung involvement and gastrointestinal involvement. Scores range from 0 to 3, with higher scores indicating more limitations.

  21. Change from baseline in 36-items short form survey (SF-36) at 48 weeks

    Time frame: At 48 weeks

    Eight scales with scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating less limitations.

  22. Change from baseline in 36-items short form survey (SF-36) at 96 weeks

    Time frame: At 96 weeks

    Eight scales with scores ranging from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating less limitations.

  23. Change from baseline in EuroQoL five dimensions (EQ-5D-5L) at 48 weeks

    Time frame: At 48 weeks

    The EQ-5D-5L questionnaire possesses 5 levels for each of the five dimensions. The five dimensions are mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression, with the following possible five responses: no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems, unable to/extreme problems. Scores are converted into an index value ranging from 0 to 1, with higher scores indicating better health state.

  24. Change from baseline in EuroQoL five dimensions (EQ-5D-5L) at 96 weeks

    Time frame: At 96 weeks

    The EQ-5D-5L questionnaire possesses 5 levels for each of the five dimensions. The five dimensions are mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression, with the following possible five responses: no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems, unable to/extreme problems. Scores are converted into an index value ranging from 0 to 1, with higher scores indicating better health state.

  25. Change from baseline in patient global assessment at 48 weeks

    Time frame: At 48 weeks

    Visual analogue scale from 0 to 10, with higher scores indicating worse disease.

  26. Change from baseline in patient global assessment at 96 weeks

    Time frame: At 96 weeks

    Visual analogue scale from 0 to 10, with higher scores indicating worse disease.

  27. Change from baseline in physician global assessment at 48 weeks

    Time frame: At 48 weeks

    Visual analogue scale from 0 to 10, with higher scores indicating worse disease.

  28. Change from baseline in physician global assessment at 96 weeks

    Time frame: At 96 weeks

    Visual analogue scale from 0 to 10, with higher scores indicating worse disease.

  29. Change from baseline in 6-minute walk oxygen saturation at 48 weeks

    Time frame: At 48 weeks

    Oxygen saturation at nadir during the 6-minute walk test

  30. Change from baseline in 6-minute walk oxygen desaturation at 96 weeks

    Time frame: At 96 weeks

    Oxygen saturation at nadir during the 6-minute walk test

  31. Change from baseline in modified Rodnan skin score (mRSS) at 48 weeks

    Time frame: At 48 weeks

    Scores range from 0 to 51, with higher scores indicating more skin involvement.

  32. Change from baseline in modified Rodnan skin score (mRSS) at 96 weeks

    Time frame: At 96 weeks

    Scores range from 0 to 51, with higher scores indicating more skin involvement.

  33. Change from baseline in nailfold capillary density at 48 weeks

    Time frame: At 48 weeks

    Mean number of capillaries per mm

  34. Change from baseline in nailfold capillary density at 96 weeks

    Time frame: At 96 weeks

    Mean number of capillaries per mm

  35. Change from baseline in nailfold capillaroscopy abnormalities and patterns at 48 weeks

    Time frame: At 48 weeks

    Ectasias/megacapillaries are scored using a semi-quantitative scale (0 = no, 1 = ≤33%, 2= 33-66%, and 3 = ≥66% abnormalities/linear mm)

  36. Change from baseline in nailfold capillaroscopy abnormalities and patterns at 96 weeks

    Time frame: At 96 weeks

    Ectasias/megacapillaries are scored using a semi-quantitative scale (0 = no, 1 = ≤33%, 2= 33-66%, and 3 = ≥66% abnormalities/linear mm)

  37. Change from baseline in quantitative SSc autoantibody titers at 48 weeks

    Time frame: At 48 weeks

  38. Change from baseline in quantitative SSc autoantibody titers at 96 weeks

    Time frame: At 96 weeks

  39. Change from baseline in Krebs von Lungen 6 (KL-6) titers at 48 weeks

    Time frame: At 48 weeks

  40. Change from baseline in Krebs von Lungen 6 (KL-6) titers at 96 weeks

    Time frame: At 96 weeks

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Sabrina Hoa, MD MSc

CONTACT

[email protected]

514-890-8000

Unité d'innovation thérapeutique, CHUM

CONTACT

[email protected]

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM)

Other

Collaborators

  • Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)
  • Institut universitaire de cardiologie et de pneumologie de Québec, University Laval
  • Jewish General Hospital
  • McGill University
  • Sclérodermie Québec
  • University of Calgary

Registry information

Official study title

Randomized Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial to Assess the Efficacy of Mycophenolate Mofetil in Subclinical Interstitial Lung Disease Associated With Systemic Sclerosis: a Feasibility Study

Acronym: SSc-mILD

Important dates

Study start
2024
Primary completion
2026
Study completion
2028
First posted
Mar 27, 2023
Registry last updated
Apr 11, 2025

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.