Rigshospitalet
Copenhagen, Denmark
NCT Number: NCT03347162
PURPOSE: To determine the prognostic properties of a comprehensive evaluation of body composition and physical function in patients with GI-HEP cancer from point of diagnosis and throughout the treatment trajectory.
GI-HEP: Patients with tumors of the upper gastrointestinal or hepatobiliary tract, specifically tumors of the esophagus, gastro-esophageal junction, stomach, primary tumors of the liver or biliary tract, as well as colorectal liver metastasis or tumors of the pancreas.
This study is active but is not currently recruiting participants.
18 year and older
All sexes
Observational
Copenhagen, Denmark
RATIONAL: Patients diagnosed with GI-HEP cancer are faced with poor prognosis. The treatment is demanding and associated with severe deconditioning potentially leading to worse prognostic outcomes. To what extend patients body composition at the point of diagnoses, as well as changes in body composition throughout the cancer continuum is associated with cancer outcomes is currently not well-described, specifically if this should be part of standard clinical evaluation in order to optimize therapy-efficacy. Recent findings suggest that pathophysiological alterations in skeletal muscle mass and function can have significant implications for the risk of disease progression and long-term prognosis.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Time frame: From baseline to 30 days post surgery
Incidens rate of post-operative complications (Clavien-Dindo grade 2 or higher).
Time frame: From baseline to 1 year follow-up
Incidens rate of medical complications (dose-reduction, temporary or permanent discontinuation)
Time frame: From baseline to 1 year follow-up
Total number days in hospital
Time frame: From baseline to 1 year follow-up
Risk of disease progression
Time frame: From baseline to 1 year follow-up
Risk of mortality from any-cause
Time frame: From baseline to 6 months follow-up
Dual-energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DXA) scan
Time frame: From baseline to 6 months follow-up
Dual-energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DXA) scan
Time frame: From baseline to 6 months follow-up
Dual-energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DXA) scan
Time frame: From baseline to 6 months follow-up
Dual-energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DXA) scan
Time frame: From baseline to 6 months follow-up
Dual-energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DXA) scan
Time frame: From baseline to 6 months follow-up
Dual-energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DXA) scan
Time frame: From baseline to 6 months follow-up
L3 muscle area determined by Computed tomography scan (performed for clinical purpose) adjusted for hight
Time frame: From baseline to 6 months follow-up
Maximum 10 meter walking speed
Time frame: From baseline to 6 months follow-up
Timed Stair-climbing test
Time frame: From baseline to 6 months follow-up
30 seconds Sit-To-Stand test
Time frame: From baseline to 6 months follow-up
Leg extensor power test (Nottingham Power rig)
Time frame: From baseline to 6 months follow-up
Maximum strength test by handgrip dynanometer
Time frame: From baseline to 6 months follow-up
Blood sample
Time frame: From baseline to 6 months follow-up
Blood sample
Time frame: From baseline to 6 months follow-up
Blood sample
Time frame: From baseline to 6 months follow-up
Blood sample
Time frame: From baseline to 6 months follow-up
Blood sample
Time frame: From baseline to 6 months follow-up
Blood sample
Time frame: From baseline to 6 months follow-up
Blood sample
Time frame: From baseline to 6 months follow-up
Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy (FACT) questionnaire
Time frame: From baseline to 6 months follow-up
Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) questionnaire
Time frame: From baseline to 6 months follow-up
Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) questionnaire
Time frame: From baseline to 6 months follow-up
International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ) short form
Rigshospitalet, Denmark
Other
Prognostic Role of Muscle Dysfunction in Patients With Gastrointestinal or Hepatobiliary Cancer - An Observational Study of Two Patient Cohorts
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT03452774
Adenocarcinoma, Adnexal Diseases
Birmingham, Alabama, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05041335
Cancer, Cancer of Esophagus
Tampa, Florida, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT03133286
Adnexal Diseases, Anus Diseases
Compton, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT04258813
Adenocarcinoma, Adnexal Diseases
Durham, North Carolina, United States
View Trial Details