Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañon
Madrid, 28009, Spain
Location status: Recruiting
NCT Number: NCT07118488
To assess the efficacy and safety of a percutaneous ablation strategy that targets multiple extrapulmonary structures as the Cox-Maze IV.
Interested in participating?
Request Info18 year–80 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Madrid, 28009, Spain
Location status: Recruiting
Persistent and long-standing atrial fibrillation (PsAF and LSAF) remain significant clinical challenges, particularly in patients with heart failure or high comorbidity burden, where the arrhythmia is often more sustained, complex, and resistant to conventional ablation approaches. Despite advancements in ablation technology, pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) alone has shown limited success in this subgroup. Current guidelines acknowledge the need for additional ablation targets beyond the pulmonary veins (PVs), yet evidence remains scarce and optimal strategies undefined.
This single-arm, prospective pilot study investigates a novel ablation strategy that combines multi-target pulsed field ablation (PFA) with both endocardial intracavitary electrogram (EGM) mapping and non-invasive body surface mapping (BSM) to guide the identification and ablation of extra-PV atrial fibrillation drivers. This approach is designed to emulate the multilevel strategy of the surgical Cox-Maze IV, aiming for comprehensive arrhythmia substrate modification while minimizing procedural risk.
The PFA+ADM protocol leverages recent advances in:
Study Workflow
After informed consent, participants will undergo implantation of an insertable cardiac monitor (ICM) to allow for continuous AF burden tracking. The ablation procedure includes:
Technical Specifics and Rationale
Rationale for Multitarget Approach:
Atrial remodeling in patients with PsAF/LSPsAF is often diffuse and multifocal. Standard PVI addresses the initiating triggers of paroxysmal AF but fails to control perpetuating mechanisms in persistent forms. The multitarget strategy aims to:
Advantages of PFA Technology:
PFA uses irreversible electroporation to ablate cardiomyocytes without significant collateral damage. This is especially relevant when targeting extrapulmonary sites near vulnerable structures (e.g., posterior wall near esophagus, Bachmann's bundle near the aorta). Additionally, PFA has demonstrated faster lesion creation and potentially shorter procedure times with comparable or superior efficacy in preclinical and early clinical data.
Integration of ECGi and EGM-based Mapping:
Simultaneous use of non-invasive ECG imaging and invasive mapping enables comprehensive localization of potential drivers, enhancing ablation precision. The goal is to improve arrhythmia control without significantly increasing procedural complexity or risk.
Patient Profile and Unmet Needs:
This trial targets patients often excluded or underrepresented in clinical trials-those with heart failure or multiple comorbidities who have higher recurrence rates post-ablation. These patients also tend to have more advanced atrial myopathy and may benefit from a more aggressive substrate modification strategy, if delivered safely.
Data Handling and Interim Analysis
Data will be collected prospectively, including electrogram recordings, ECGi maps, procedural data, imaging, and follow-up rhythm status. An interim analysis is planned after the first 25 patients to evaluate safety and refine the mapping-ablation workflow if necessary. Data from ICMs will be analyzed to calculate daily AF burden, detect arrhythmia recurrence, and correlate clinical outcomes with procedural findings.
Safety is evaluated both acutely and in follow-up, with predefined thresholds for major complications (≤5%). The use of PFA is expected to significantly reduce thermal injury risks. Procedural metrics such as total duration, fluoroscopy time, and energy delivery time will also be recorded.
This pilot study will serve as a foundation for larger multicenter trials by assessing the feasibility and clinical benefit of this precision-guided, multitarget ablation strategy in a high-risk AF population. Its results may help redefine ablation endpoints beyond pulmonary vein isolation and facilitate the integration of novel technologies into routine clinical practice.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Time frame: 1 year
Success is defined as complete isolation of all pulmonary veins and either absence of atrial fibrillation recurrence or a significant reduction in arrhythmia burden over a 1-year follow-up period.
Time frame: 6 months
The safety endpoint is defined as maintaining a complication rate of ≤5%, assessed by monitoring for acute and long-term complications such as mortality, pulmonary vein stenosis, nerve injury, stroke, bleeding, and other serious adverse events occurring within 30 days to 6 months post-procedure.
Time frame: 1 year
Percentage of patients in Per AF at the end of follow-up.
Time frame: 1 year
Time to the first episode of atrial arrhythmia of more than 30 seconds
Time frame: 1 year
Percentage of patients with AF/AT recurrence
Time frame: 1 year
Percentage of patients with <50% of AF/AT burden
Time frame: 1 year
Physician assessment to measure the function parameters and ventricular size at the end of follow-up using ECHO or MRI. Left ventricular end-systolic volume at the end of 12-month follow-up. Units in mL.
Time frame: 1 year
Physician assessment to measure the function parameters and ventricular size at the end of follow-up using ECHO or MRI. Left ventricular end-diastolic volume at the end of 12-month follow-up. Units in mL.
Time frame: 1 year
Physician assessment to measure the function parameters and ventricular size at the end of follow-up using ECHO or MRI. Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) at the end of 12-month follow-up. Units in percentage.
Time frame: 1 year
NYHA Functional Class at the end of follow-up
Time frame: 1 year
Death, peripheral embolism, stroke, and plugging
Time frame: Measured on the day of the ablation procedure. No time frame.
Procedure duration/fluoroscopy time
Time frame: 1 year
Unplanned hospital admission for cardiovascular reasons during the 12-month follow-up after the ablation procedure.
Time frame: 1 year
Unplanned hospital admission for any reason during the 12-month follow-up after the ablation procedure.
Time frame: 1 year
New onset heart failure during the 12-month follow-up after the ablation procedure.
Time frame: 1 year
Worsening of functional class due to heart failure during the 12-month follow-up after the ablation procedure.
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
Angel Arenal, MD, PhD
CONTACT
Gonzalo Ricardo Ríos-Muñoz, MSc, PhD
CONTACT
Fundacion para la Innovacion en Biomedicina (FIBMED)
Other
Acronym: PFA+ADM
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07446244
Arrhythmias, Cardiac, Atrial Fibrillation
Ljubljana, Osrednjaslovenska, Slovenia
View Trial DetailsNCT05378035
Arrhythmias, Cardiac, Arterial Thromboembolism
Hong Kong
View Trial DetailsNCT05724121
Arrhythmias, Cardiac, Atrial Fibrillation
Bethesda, Maryland, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07492524
Arrhythmias, Cardiac, Atrial Fibrillation
Yancheng, Dongtai, China
View Trial Details