VA Puget Sound Health Care System Seattle Division, Seattle, WA
Seattle, Washington, 98108-1532, United States
NCT Number: NCT04518943
Regular physical activity (PA) is essential to healthy aging. Unfortunately, only 5% of US adults meet guideline of 150 minutes of moderate exercise; Veterans and non-Veterans have similar levels of PA. A patient incentive program for PA may help. Behavioral economics suggests that the chronic inability to start and maintain a PA routine may be the result of "present bias," which is a tendency to value immediate rewards over rewards in the future. With present bias, it is always better to exercise tomorrow because the immediate gratification of watching television or surfing the internet is a more powerful motivator than the intangible and delayed benefit of future health. Patient incentives may overcome present bias by moving the rewards for exercise forward in time.
Recent randomized trials suggest that incentives for PA can be effective, but substantial gaps in knowledge prevent the implementation of a PA incentive program in Veterans Affairs (VA). First, incentive designs vary considerably. They vary by the size of the incentive, the type of incentive (cash or non-financial), the probability of earning an incentive (an assured payment for effort or a lottery-based incentive), or whether the incentive is earned after the effort is given (a gain-framed incentive) or awarded up-front and lost if the effort is not given (a loss-framed incentive). The optimal combination of these components for a Veteran population is unknown. Second, the evidence about the effective components of incentives comes from studies conducted in populations that were overwhelmingly female; often employees at large companies, with high levels of education and income. VA users, in contrast, are mostly male and lower income, and most are not employed. This is important because the investigators have theoretical reasons to believe that the effects of components of incentives are likely to vary by income and gender. Finally, few studies have managed to design an incentive such that the physical activity was maintained after the incentive was removed. Indeed, a common theme in incentivizing health behavior change is the difficulty in sustaining behavior change once the incentives are removed.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me50 year–69 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Seattle, Washington, 98108-1532, United States
The investigators propose to fill the research gaps through a Multiphase Optimization Strategy (MOST) trial of incentives for walking. A MOST trial is ideally suited for situations in which a proposed intervention has many potential intervention components. A MOST trial consists of three phases. A screening phase trial is used to efficiently identify-through a factorial designed randomized trial-the effective components of a complex intervention like incentives. A refining phase trial tests the optimal dose (size or duration) of the incentives. A confirmatory phase trial tests the optimal components and dose against a usual care control. The goal of the proposed study is to conduct the screening phase trial in 128 Veterans to identify the optimal components of incentives for increasing walking among physically inactive Veterans. All Veterans in this phase will be given various components of incentives for increasing average steps per day to 7,000 steps over a 12-week habit-building period, and then maintaining the increase through a 12-week habit maintenance period. The specific aims are:
Aim 1: Conduct a 24 factorial designed screening-phase trial of incentives for increasing average steps per day to 7,000 steps over 12 weeks among physically inactive Veterans. Every patient in the trial will be given a Fitbit Inspire activity monitor and assigned to a group that receives different components of incentives. The investigators will test four different incentive factors: 1) lottery vs. loss framed incentives, 2) financial vs. non-financial incentives, 3) a pre-commitment postcard reminder of a Veteran's stated intrinsic reason for commitment to PA vs. no pre-commitment postcard, and 4) a request for PA advice from a Veteran on staying active vs. no request. The first factor has never been tested in a population like the VA. Factors 2-4 are designed specifically to sustain the effects of incentives after the incentive is removed. Factor 4 is a novel hypothesis that has never been tested outside of educational research: specifically, that asking for advice from a Veteran is more motivating than giving advice to them, even if that Veteran is struggling with low physical activity themselves. The primary outcome is change in steps per week from baseline to week 24.
Aim 2. Conduct cost analyses and qualitative interviews. The cost of administering each component and qualitative assessments of the acceptability of each component to trial participants will inform the decision of which components to retain for the subsequent refining and confirmatory phase trials.
Aim 3. Convene an expert panel to choose components for the next phases of the MOST trial. The panel will weigh each component in terms of its effect on step counts (Aim 1), administrative costs and participant-reported qualitative assessments (Aim 2), and the strength of the theoretical basis for the component's effect on physical activity.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Inactive Veterans will be encouraged to increase their step count to 7,000 steps per day by the end of the 12-week intervention period. Weekly the step goal will increase 15% if they were successful in reaching their goal the previous week.
Time frame: baseline to week 12
The change in average steps per day from the baseline week to week 12.
Time frame: baseline to week 24
The change in average steps per day from the baseline week to week 24
Time frame: Measured at baseline, week 12 and 24
Measured using the Exercise Self-Efficacy Scale at baseline, week 12 and week 24 (McAuley E 1993). This scale measures self-efficacy on nine different measures from not confident (0 rating) to very confident (10 rating).The range is 0 to 10. A higher rating indicates that the respondent is more confident they will be able to overcome barriers to physical activity.
Time frame: Measured at baseline, week 12 and 24
Measured using the Motivation for Physical Activity Measurement (MPAM) at baseline, week 12 and week 24 (Frederick CM 1993). This scale measures reasons and motivations for participating in physical activity having respondents indicate why they exercise. The scale ranges from 1=very true for me, 2= somewhat true for me, 3=neither true nor untrue for me, 4=somewhat untrue for me, 5= very untrue for me. The minimum score is 1 and the maximum is 5. Higher scores means more intrinsic motivation to exercise.
Time frame: Measured at baseline, week 12 and 24
Measured using the PHQ-8 depression scale at baseline, week 12 and week 24. This assessment measures depressive symptoms over the past 2 weeks. Respondents indicate how bothered they were by the following problems on a scale from 0 (not at all) to 3 (nearly every day). The minimum and maximum score are zero and 24, respectively. A lower score indicates fewer depressive symptoms.
VA Office of Research and Development
Fed
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT04711512
Behavior, Exercise
Glassboro, New Jersey, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05563805
Anxiety, Anxiety Disorders
Arlington, Texas, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT04019119
Back Pain, Behavior
Málaga, Spain
View Trial DetailsNCT06018974
Aging, Behavior
Oulu, Finland
View Trial Details