Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT03205514

Multimodality Investigation of Intermediate Culprit Lesion With Negative FFR in NSTE-ACS

Ten-fifteen percent of acute coronary syndromes without ST-segment elevation (NSTE-ACS) are caused by intermediate lesions without signs of unstable plaque. In this subset of patients, fractional flow reserve (FFR) has some drawbacks and may not be always able to predict outcome, especially when negative (above 0.80). In this particular nique of patients, advanced imaging techniques are suggested by International guidelines. However, it is actually unknown how these techniques may impact treatment strategies. With the present study, the investigators want to characterize the mechanism of disease in this particular subset of patients through multimodality imaging (intravascular ultrasound-near infrared spectroscopy (IVUS-NIRS), optical coherence tomography (OCT)) in order to understand the proper treatment.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Observational

Primary location

University Hospital of Ferrara

Cona, Ferrara, 44124, Italy

About this study

Acute coronary syndrome without ST-segment elevation (NSTE-ACS) is by far the most frequent acute coronary syndrome (ACS) in the western world. In most of the cases, it is caused by a clearly identifiable culprit lesion, configuring a significant angiographic stenosis (>70%), with flux limitation and typical aspects of unstable plaque (thrombosis). In these cases, the one and only treatment is stent implantation. In a small percentage of patients (10-15%), NSTE-ACS is caused by an angiographically intermediate lesion (40-70%). This lesion is identifiable as culprit, but without the typical signs of unstable plaque.

In patients with stable coronary artery disease (SCAD) presenting with this type of lesion, fractional flow reserve (FFR) is the actual gold-standard for ischemic burden evaluation. Several studies showed that if FFR value is ≤0.80, the treatment with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is associated with a significant reduction of hard cardiovascular events. When FFR is negative (>0.80), optical medical therapy showed a better outcome when compared to percutaneous intervention. In NSTE-ACS, FFR evaluation of intermediate lesions is still mandatory, as a recent study showed a better outcome in patient with positive fractional flow reserve treated invasively with stenting compared to patients treated solely based on angiography (1). When FFR is negative, several authors and studies suggest that further imaging techniques are needed. In this subgroup of patients with intermediate stenosis without angiographic evidence of plaque rupture, European Guidelines (2) suggest utilization of intravascular ultrasound-near infrared spectroscopy (IVUS-NIRS) or optical coherence tomography (OCT) in order to better characterize the culprit plaque. At the same time, the therapeutic strategy is left to the operator's discretion: some implant a stent in order to reduce occurrence of future events, while some others leave the patient in optical medical therapy without stent implantation. Moreover, in these patients, it is still unclear the pathophysiology of the disease leading to ACS. In the last years, researchers focused their attention on plaque erosion, deemed to be responsible for most of these NSTE-ACS (3). An imaging study evaluated the incidence of plaque erosion in patients with ACS (4). This study enrolled an heterogeneous group of patients, evaluated with a single imaging technique (OCT).

Based on these background, the investigators hypothesized to perform a prospective single-center data registry on this highly selected subgroup of patients: NSTE-ACS with culprit intermediate lesion with negative FFR evaluation.

Investigators will enroll consecutive patients with NSTE-ACS with a culprit intermediate stenosis between 40 and 70% and in whom FFR evaluation will result negative (>0.80). In these patients, the operator will perform IVUS-NIRS and OCT and a blood sample to evaluate endothelial function as per our previous experience (5). The study has no control group. Endothelial function and inflammatory state will be evaluated in all patients and will be compared to those obtained by patients enrolled in the NATHAN NEVER study (NCT02519608, Study ID: 150497)(5).

Aim of the present study is to understand whether in this group of patient endothelial function is impaired and which information is given by intracoronary imaging (presence of plaque erosion). The present study is a prospective data collection. Thus, a formal sample size calculation is not applicable. Contemporaneously, for pilot studies, at least 30 patients are recommended (6).

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • diagnosis of no-ST elevation-acute coronary syndrome
  • clinical indication to coronary artery angiography
  • angiographic documentation of intermediate lesion (40%-70%) with anterograde TIMI 3 flow eligible for FFR evaluation
  • negative FFR evaluation (>0.80)

Exclusion criteria

  • cardiogenic shock
  • any indication to stent treatment for lesion
  • previous stent implantation on the target vessel
  • left main disease
  • massive thrombus presence in the culprit vessel
  • life expectancy less than 12 months

Treatment and study plan

NSTE-ACS with intermediate stenosis and negative FFR

Diagnostic Test

Patients will undergo intracoronary imaging evaluation with IVUS-NIRS and OCT, endothelial function and inflammatory state evaluation.

Primary outcomes

  1. Plaque erosion incidence

    Time frame: intra-procedure

    OCT-erosion: evidence of thrombotic material, irregular luminal surface without evidence of plaque fissure in multiple adjacent frames.

    IVUS/NIRS erosion: evidence of thrombotic material, irregular luminal surface without evidence of plaque fissure in multiple adjacent frames with lipid core burden index lower than the validated cutoff for unstable plaque (LCBI 4mm<400).

Secondary outcomes

  1. Incidence of intermediate lesions with negative FFR in NSTE-ACS

    Time frame: intra-procedure

    Incidence of intermediate lesions with negative FFR in the whole population of NSTE-ACS

  2. Vessel Lipid burden

    Time frame: intra-procedure

    Vessel Lipid burden at IVUS-NIRS evaluation (total LCBI) in patients with intermediate plaque and negative FFR

  3. Plaque Lipid burden

    Time frame: intra-procedure

    Plaque Lipid burden at IVUS-NIRS evaluation (max LCBI 4 mm) in patients with intermediate plaque and negative FFR

  4. Apoptosis rate in HUVEC

    Time frame: intra-procedure

    Rate of apoptosis in human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVEC) incubated with serum from patients enrolled in the study.

  5. NO intracellular levels

    Time frame: intra-procedure

    Modulation of intracellular levels of nitric oxid (NO) in HUVECs treated with serum from patients enrolled in the study

  6. ROS production

    Time frame: intra-procedure

    Intracellular levels of reactive oxygen species (ROS) in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) isolated from patients enrolled in the study

  7. Inflammation markers levels

    Time frame: intra-procedure

    Values of the most important inflammation cytokines (hs-PCR, fibrinogen, IL-6, IL-1Ra, TNF-alpha)

  8. Ischemic adverse events

    Time frame: 1 year

    Cumulative incidence of ischemic adverse events (death, myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis).

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

University Hospital of Ferrara

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Multimodality Investigation of Intermediate Culprit Lesion With Negative Fractional Flow Reserve in Patients With no ST-segment Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome.

Acronym: SHERLOCK

Important dates

Study start
2017
Primary completion
2018
Study completion
2021
First posted
Jul 2, 2017
Registry last updated
Apr 29, 2021

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.