Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT04470037

Multidisciplinary Study of Novel NMDA Modulation for Neurodegenerative Disorder

Alzheimer's disease (AD) and Parkinson's disease (PD) are currently the leading neurodegenerative disorders. Considering the fact that aged population is rapidly growing, it has become a critical issue to find more effective medications for these two disorders. The aim of this project is to examine the effectiveness and safety of DAAOI-P treatment for PD with dementia.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

50 year–90 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 2

Primary location

Department of Psychiatry, China Medical University Hospital

Taichung, Taiwan

About this study

Alzheimer's disease (AD) and Parkinson's disease (PD) are currently the leading neurodegenerative disorders. Despite some therapeutic benefits from the medications targeting at cholinergic and dopaminergic pathways in AD and PD respectively, it remains far away from a satisfied treatment goal. DAAOI-P is a D-amino acid oxidase (DAAO) inhibitor and an agent specific to facilitate NMDA receptor subunit 1 (NR1). The investigators have demonstrated that NMDA-enhancement can help PD-D patients. The aim of this project is to examine the effectiveness and safety of DAAOI-P treatment for PD with dementia. In addition to evaluating clinical treatment response, multidisciplinary examinations, including electroencephalography, transcranial magnetic stimulation, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and psychophysical methods to analyze the changes in perceptual sensitivity to faces, emotion expressions, and biological motion recognition will be arranged to elucidate the underlying mechanism of NMDA modulation in neurodegenerative disorder.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • PD-D will be diagnosed according to the criteria proposed by Movement Disorder Society task force statement. (Emre et al. 2007) . The following wordings are modified from the task force statement. I. Core features
  • Diagnosis of PD according to Queen Square Brain Bank criteria
  • A dementia syndrome with insidious onset and slow progression, developing within the context of established PD and diagnosed by history, clinical, and mental examination, defined as:
  • Impairment in more than one cognitive domain
  • Representing a decline from premorbid level
  • Deficits severe enough to impair daily life, independent of the impairment ascribable to motor or autonomic symptoms
  • MMSE score between 10-26.

II. Associated clinical features

  • Cognitive features: Impaired attention, executive functions, visuo-spatial functions or memory. Core functions of language are largely preserved.
  • Behavioral features:
  • Apathy
  • Changes in personality and mood
  • Hallucination• Delusions
  • Excessive daytime sleepiness

III. Features which do not exclude PD-D, but make the diagnosis uncertain

  • Co-existence of any other abnormality which may by itself cause cognitive impairment, but judged not to be the cause of dementia.
  • Time interval between the development of motor and cognitive symptoms is uncertain

IV. Features suggesting other conditions or diseases as cause of mental impairment, which, when present make it impossible to reliably diagnose PD-D

  • Cognitive and behavioral symptoms appearing solely in the context of other conditions such as:
  • Acute confusion due to systemic illnesses or drug intoxication.
  • Major depression
  • Features compatible with "Probable Vascular dementia" criteria according to NINDS-AIREN Criteria for the diagnosis of probable and possible PD-D [Probable PD-D] Both core features must be present. In associated clinical features, typical profile of cognitive deficits should be present in at least 2 of the 4 core cognitive domains. The presence of at least one behavioral symptom supports the diagnosis of probable PD-D. None of group III and IV features is present. [Possible PD-D] Both core features must be present. In associated clinical features, the cognitive impairment is atypical in one or more domains. The behavioral symptoms are not necessary to be present. One or more of the group III features may be present. No group IV feature is allowed to be present.

Exclusion criteria

  • Patients with uncontrollable malignancy, severe heart failure, uremia under hemodialysis, or decompensated liver cirrhosis.
  • Patients taking anticholinergics within 30 days of recruitment.

Treatment and study plan

DAAOI-P

Drug

DAAOI-P 250-1500mg

Placebo

Drug

starch pill

Primary outcomes

  1. The improvement of gait and neuropsychiatric symptoms

    Time frame: week 0, 8, 16, 24

    Change in Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS)

    UPDRS: Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale Minimum value: 0 Maximum value: 199 The higher score means a worse outcome.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Gait function

    Time frame: week 0, 8, 16, 24

    The Cyclogram of Gait

    Minimum value: 0 Maximum value: 100 The higher score means a better outcome.

  2. Fall assessment

    Time frame: week 0, 8, 16, 24

    The fall assessment test of China Medical University Hospital

    Minimum value: 0 Maximum value: 10 The higher score means a worse outcome.

  3. Cognitive function

    Time frame: week 0, 8, 16, 24

    Change in Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive Subscale (ADAS-Cog)

    ADAS-Cog: Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive Subscale Minimum value: 0 Maximum value: 70 The higher score means a worse outcome.

  4. Neuropsychiatric symptoms

    Time frame: week 0, 8, 16, 24

    Change in Neuropsychiatry Inventory (NPI)

    NPI: Neuropsychiatry Inventory Minimum value: 0 Maximum value: 144 The higher score means a worse outcome

  5. The improvement of Parkinson's disease

    Time frame: week 0, 8, 16, 24

    Change in The 39-item Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-39)

    PDQ-39: The 39-item Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire Minimum value: 0 Maximum value: 156 The higher score means a worse outcome.

  6. Behavioral Pathology of dementia

    Time frame: week 0, 8, 16, 24

    Change in Behavioral Pathology in Alzheimer's Disease Rating Scale (Behave-AD)

    Behave-AD: Behavioral Pathology in Alzheimer's Disease Rating Scale Minimum value: 0 Maximum value: 75 The higher score means a worse outcome.

  7. Severity of dementia

    Time frame: week 0, 8, 16, 24

    Change in Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR)

    CDR: Clinical Dementia Rating Minimum value: 0 Maximum value: 5 The higher score means a worse outcome.

  8. Neuroimaging examinations

    Time frame: week 0, 24

    Neuroimaging examinations contains: (1) Structural MRI, (2) Resting-state fMRI, and (3) Working memory fMRI.

  9. Face perception

    Time frame: week 0, 8, 16, 24

    Changes in perceptual discriminability (d-prime index)

    Minimum value: 0 (chance level); Maximum value: 3.0 (nearly perfect)

  10. Emotion recognition and imitation

    Time frame: week 0, 8, 16, 24

    Changes in emotion recognition accuracy and imitation probability

    Minimum value: 0%; Maximum value: 100% (Higher score indicate a better outcome)

  11. Transcranial magnetic stimulation

    Time frame: week 0, 8, 16, 24

    Change in Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) assessments

  12. Electroencephalography

    Time frame: week 0, 8, 16, 24

    Changes in Mismatch negativity (MMN)

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

China Medical University Hospital

Other

Collaborators

  • Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan

Registry information

Important dates

Study start
2016
Primary completion
2024
Study completion
2025
First posted
Jul 14, 2020
Registry last updated
Nov 19, 2025

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.