ICM
Montpellier, Herault, 34298, France
NCT Number: NCT07404228
Rectal cancer presents a significant global health challenge. Despite improvements in clinical outcomes, significant disparities persist across Europe. These differences are explained not only by the heterogeneity of risk factors and screening strategies, but also by variations in diagnostic and therapeutic approaches, which are highly dependent on medical imaging.
Standard treatment for locally advanced rectal cancer based on staging MRI is neoadjuvant treatment (NAT), for tumour downsizing and downstaging, followed by total mesorectal excision. In a significant proportion of cases, radical surgery leads to substantial long-term complications like sexual and urinary dysfunction, fecal incontinence, and impairment in daily activities. Given that up to 42% of patients show complete tumor regression at pathology (i.e. pathological complete response pCR), to avoid unnecessary radical surgery, non-operative management has become an attractive alternative when there are no signs of viable tumour after NAT (i.e. clinical complete response cCR). Such patients are candidates for Watch-and-Wait (W&W), an established active surveillance policy in specialized centers worldwide relying on clinical examination, endoscopy and MRI.
On the other hand, W&W carries a risk of local regrowth (persistence of microscopic residual disease despite apparent cCR). Even in expert hands, assessment of tumor response is not perfect and local regrowth based on current selection methods occurs in ~30% of cases. Although deferred surgery is a successful treatment with no apparent negative impact on local disease control, an increased rate of distant metastases has been recently reported.
Therefore, there is a critical unmet clinical need to detect complete responses after NAT and avoid unnecessary surgery with its associated morbidity and quality of life impairment risks, while also improving sensitivity for residual microscopic disease that will result in local regrowth and associated reduced disease-free survival.
Rectal cancer poses a burden not only on healthcare systems, but also on patient well-being. Patients frequently suffer from feelings of isolation and helplessness when faced with unpredicted disease-related situations, given the common difficulties to access high quality information and communicate with attending physicians. As such, there is a clear need to unburden healthcare facilities from unnecessary hospital visits, while improving patient outcomes, engagement, support and care.
Trial opening soon.
Get Notified18 year and older
All sexes
Observational
Montpellier, Herault, 34298, France
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
for the preclinical phase :
Inclusion criteria
for the clinical phase:
For all patients, questionnaires will be completed:
The following validated questionnaires will be used:
Time frame: From the baseline to the end of follow up, assessed up to 27 months
using the area under the ROC curve (AUC) to distinguish pathological complete response (pCR) from residual disease.
Time frame: From the baseline to the end of follow up, assessed up to 27 months
The overall diagnostic performance of the model will be evaluated using various indicators: Diagnostic accuracy: defined as the overall proportion of correct classifications, Sensitivity, Specificity, Positive predictive value and Negative predictive value
Time frame: From the baseline to the end of follow up, assessed up to 27 months
MRI-histology correlation: statistical correlation between advanced MRI data (derived from ex vivo acquisitions) and the corresponding histological measurements of surgical specimens. Regions of interest (ROIs) defined on ex vivo MRI will be matched with digitized histology. This criterion will validate the new biomarkers.
Time frame: From the baseline to the end of follow up, assessed up to 27 months
Establishment of a data registry: creation of a functional, populated database of rectal cancer cases that is compliant with the FAIR principles (Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, Reusable).
Time frame: From the baseline to the end of follow up, assessed up to 27 months
Quality of life scores: scores obtained from standardized questionnaires collected via a digital application to assess the overall impact of the disease and treatments on patients' lives. These will be analyzed using linear mixed models, comparing the surgical group with the "Watch-and-Wait" group over time.
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
Institut du Cancer de Montpellier - Val d'Aurelle
Other
Acronym: RESTAGE
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06758830
Chemoradiotherapy, Chemotherapy
Vilnius, Lithuania
View Trial DetailsNCT07198165
Chemoradiotherapy, Colorectal Neoplasms
Shanghai, China
View Trial DetailsNCT04696757
Chemoradiotherapy, Colorectal Neoplasms
Seoul, South Korea
View Trial DetailsNCT07580339
Colorectal Neoplasms, Digestive System Diseases
Baltimore, Maryland, United States
View Trial Details