Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Not Yet Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT06719505

Multicomponent vs Pilates on Mass, Strength, and Physical Performance in Older Adults

Introduction: The aging process can result in several physiological changes, such as the loss of muscle mass, muscle strength, and physical performance, collectively defined as sarcopenia. Sarcopenia is considered one of the primary health challenges among older adults. To prevent this condition and improve related health outcomes, regular physical exercise is the most recommended strategy, with multicomponent exercises being particularly effective for older individuals. Pilates is another potential form of physical exercise that has gained popularity among older adults seeking to improve muscle mass, strength, and physical performance. However, significant gaps remain in the literature, with a notable lack of studies evaluating the efficacy of Pilates in improving sarcopenic outcomes. Objective: To compare the efficacy of multicomponent training programs versus Pilates in improving muscle mass, muscle strength, and physical performance in older adults. Methods: A total of 100 older adults aged 60 to 80 years, of both sexes, will be randomized into two intervention groups: the Multicomponent Training Group (n=50) and the Pilates Group (n=50). Evaluations will be conducted at three time points: baseline (before the intervention), mid-treatment (3 months), and post-treatment (6 months). The following instruments will be used: Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) will be used to assess muscle mass. Muscle strength will be evaluated using an isokinetic dynamometer for the lower limbs and a handgrip dynamometer for the upper limbs. Physical performance will be assessed through the Brazilian version of the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB), the gait speed test, and the Timed Up and Go (TUG) test. The Feeling Scale will be applied to determine the affective valence of the exercise programs. The Shapiro-Wilk test will be performed to check the normality of the data, Student's t-test or Mann-Whitney U test will be used depending on whether the distribution is parametric or non-parametric, and ANCOVA will be used to compare the groups post-intervention, considering a 95% confidence interval (p<0.05). The data will be analyzed using SPSS 25.0 software.

Not Yet Recruiting

Trial opening soon.

Get Notified

Key information

Age range

60 year–80 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Universidade

Jacarezinho, Paraná, 86400-000, Brazil

Location contact

Laís C. de Oliveira, PhD

CONTACT

[email protected]

(55) 43 99613-7944

Laís C. de Oliveira, PhD

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Maria Clara F. Lucio, PT

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Raphael G. de Oliveira, PhD

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

About this study

The sample will consist of 100 elderly individuals of both sexes, aged between 60 and 80 years. The sample size calculation for this study was performed using the Bioestat 5.3 program, based on the values of whole-body DEXA (dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry) assessment, provided in a previous study (Seo et al., 2021). In this case, the post-intervention mean and standard deviation between the Resistance Training group (1566.75±189.47) and the Control group (maintaining routine habits) (1446.86 ± 206.42) were used, with a test power of 80%, an alpha value of 0.05, and a 15% error rate, which indicated the need for 50 participants in each group (Multicomponent Group and Pilates Group). Descriptive data analysis will be expressed as mean, standard deviation, and percentage delta of the difference. Normality will be assessed using the Shapiro-Wilk test. To verify if there are differences between the groups regarding baseline characteristics (age, weight, height, and BMI) at the pre-intervention stage, Student's t-test for independent samples or the Mann-Whitney U test will be used, depending on whether the data are parametric or non-parametric. To compare the groups post-intervention, ANCOVA will be used, with baseline data as covariates. If the data exhibit non-parametric characteristics, the Mann-Whitney U test will be applied to compare the groups based on the difference between pre- and post-intervention. A confidence interval of 95% (p<0.05) will be accepted. Data will be processed using SPSS 25.0 software. Effect sizes (Cohen's d) will be calculated and classified as small (0.20), medium (0.50), or large (0.80). For effect size calculations, the GPower 3.1 program will be used.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Not currently participating in a physical training program for at least six months;
  • No medical restrictions for physical activity and physical tests;
  • Achieve a score of 19 or higher on the Mini-Mental State Examination.

Exclusion criteria

  • Individuals with severe/disabling musculoskeletal and/or neurological dysfunctions;
  • Neurological disorders or cognitive impairment;
  • Use of supplements for muscle mass increase;
  • History of recent fractures or surgeries and severe cardiorespiratory diseases.

Treatment and study plan

ME

Other

Exercises selected with a focus on the major muscle groups. There will be one protocol for the first 3 months and a second protocol for months 4-6, with the number of repetitions for each exercise varying from 3 sets of 8 to 10 repetitions, totaling 18 exercises.

PE

Other

The stretching and strengthening exercises will target the major muscle groups, and at the end of each session (lasting approximately 60 minutes), the instructor will guide the participant through a relaxation exercise using an EVA foam roller. The exercises were selected to improve overall muscle strength, as traditionally applied in Pilates. There will be one protocol for the first 3 months and a second protocol for months 4-6, with 17 exercises in each protocol, varying from 3 sets of 8 to 10 repetitions.

Primary outcomes

  1. 1. Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA)

    Time frame: 6 months

    A high-precision reference standard used to measure lean muscle mass. The values will be calculated by the ratio of appendicular lean mass divided by the square of height in meters, with values lower than 7 kg/m² for men and 5.5 kg/m² for women confirming the diagnosis of low lean mass.

  2. 2. Biodex Isokinetic Dynamometer System

    Time frame: 6 months

    Evaluation of isokinetic muscle strength of the knee extensors and flexors. The assessment consists of knee extension and flexion (concentric/concentric) at an angular velocity of 60°/s, starting with the knee flexed at 90°. Three sets of five repetitions will be performed with a 30-second rest interval between sets, and the same procedure will be carried out with the left leg.

  3. 3. Hydraulic Hand Dynamometer

    Time frame: 6 months

    Evaluation of handgrip strength. The best value from three attempts will be used for each hand.

  4. 4. Brazilian Version of the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB)

    Time frame: 6 months

    A battery of tests to assess physical performance, including balance, gait speed, and chair rise tests. It has predictive validity and clinical applicability.

  5. 5. Gait Speed Test: Evaluation of gait speed through the 4-meter Walking Speed Test and the 6-Minute Walk Test (6MWT)

    Time frame: 6 months

    The 4-meter Walking Speed Test is used as a short-distance gait speed test, measuring habitual or maximum speed manually with a stopwatch or electronically with a device to measure the individual's walking time over a four-meter course. The 6MWT is a submaximal measure of aerobic capacity. Both tests are used to assess physical performance

  6. 6. Timed Up and Go (TUG)

    Time frame: 6 months

    A test used to assess physical function, commonly employed to evaluate the risk of falls. For the test, the time it takes for participants to rise from a chair, walk at a comfortable pace in a straight line for three meters, turn around, and return to the chair to sit down will be timed.

Secondary outcomes

  1. 7. Simple questionnaire to rapidly diagnose sarcopenia (SARC-F)

    Time frame: 6 months

    It is a validated and consistent questionnaire to identify people at risk of adverse outcomes due to sarcopenia. It consists of 5 items, self-reported by patients, based on the individual's perception of their strength limitations, ability to walk, get up from a chair, climb stairs and history of falls. Each item can be scored from 0 to 2, with 0 being no difficulty, 1 being some difficulty, and 2 being very difficult or unable to perform. In the falls item, 0 corresponds to no falls, 1 corresponds to 1 to 3 falls and 2 corresponds to 4 or more falls. The final score can range from 0 to 10, with a score of 4 being considered predictive of sarcopenia.

  2. 8. Mini Nutritional Assessment (MNA)

    Time frame: 6 months

    A screening tool for the nutritional status of participants, consisting of simple measures and six questions that can be answered in less than 5 minutes. It includes anthropometric measurements (body mass index, weight loss), global assessment (mobility), and dietary questionnaire and subjective evaluation (food intake, neuropsychological issues, acute illness). A score between 12-14 points indicates normal nutrition, 8-11 points indicates a risk of malnutrition, and 0-7 points indicates malnutrition.

  3. 9. Feeling Scale - Pleasure and Displeasure during Exercise

    Time frame: 6 months

    The affective valence scale will be used to measure participants' feelings of pleasure/affect related to the exercises. The score ranges from +5, indicating pleasure during exercise with a feeling of "very good," to -5, indicating displeasure with a feeling of "very bad" during exercise execution. The closer the score is to +5, the more pleasure the participant experiences while performing the exercise.

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Maria Clara F. Lucio, PT

CONTACT

[email protected]

(55)15 997667410

Raphael G. de Oliveira, PhD

CONTACT

[email protected]

(55) 43 996417628

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Universidade Estadual do Norte do Parana

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Comparison Between a Multicomponent Training Program and Pilates on Muscle Mass, Muscle Strength, and Physical Performance in Older Adults: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Acronym: versus

Important dates

Study start
2025
Primary completion
2025
Study completion
2026
First posted
Dec 5, 2024
Registry last updated
Dec 13, 2024

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.