Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Not Yet Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT05241067

Multicentric, Randomized Study to Assess Safety and Efficacy of Centhaquine in Patients With ARDS

Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is a life-threatening condition with a diffuse, inflammatory form of lung injury, causing pulmonary infiltration and respiratory failure leading to poor oxygenation. It is a rapidly progressive form of respiratory failure and accounts for approximately 10% of admissions to the intensive care unit (ICU) and has a high mortality (40%) in severe cases. Globally, approximately 3 million ARDS cases are reported each year, with around 200,000 cases seen in the United States.

The etiology of ARDS could be pulmonary or extra-pulmonary. Patients with ARDS have symptoms like difficulty in breathing, shortness of breath, and cyanosis, and they may require assisted breathing/ventilatory support/extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. About 25% of ARDS patients need mechanical ventilation to support breathing; however, a ventilator-induced lung injury (VILI) is known to further exacerbate ARDS in many of them. In recent decades, numerous efforts have been made to develop therapies for treating/managing ARDS. Unfortunately, they have been largely unsuccessful or inconclusive, and at present, no effective pharmacological therapy for ARDS is available. Hence, development of better therapeutics for ARDS is an unmet need.

Centhaquine is a first-in-class resuscitative agent for hypovolemic shock approved for marketing in India. Centhaquine has been found to be an effective resuscitative agent in rat, rabbit, and swine models of hemorrhagic shock. Its safety and tolerability have been demonstrated in a human phase I study in 25 subjects (CTRI/2014/06/004647). Results from multicentric, randomized, double-blind, parallel, controlled clinical phase II (CTRI/2017/03/008184) and phase III (CTRI/2019/01/017196) studies conducted in India indicate that centhaquine is a novel, first-in-class, highly effective resuscitative agent for hypovolemic shock. A total of 155 patients with hypovolemic shock have been studied in the combined phase II and III trials, while a multicentric phase IV study (NCT05956418) in 400 patients with hypovolemic shock is currently being conducted in India. The outcomes of the completed trials indicate that centhaquine is safe and reduces mortality significantly (P=0.0271) compared to standard treatment of hypovolemic shock. In the phase II and III studies, ARDS and MODS were evaluated as secondary endpoints. Centhaquine provided hemodynamic stability and significantly reduced ARDS and multiple organ dysfunction score (MODS) in patients enrolled in these trials, which suggests that centhaquine has potential beyond treating hypovolemic shock and could be useful for ARDS treatment. Centhaquine is likely to provide hemodynamic stability, improve tissue oxygenation, reduce pulmonary edema, reduce ARDS score, and reduce MODS in patients with ARDS.

Not Yet Recruiting

Trial opening soon.

Get Notified

Key information

About this study

This is a multicentric, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase-II clinical study to assess the safety and efficacy of centhaquine as an adjuvant to the standard of care in patients with moderate to severe ARDS. Approximately 10 study centers in the United States will participate in the study. For an individual patient, the duration of the study will be 60 days, including 3 study visits: visit 1/Day 1 (screening/randomization/baseline/treatment visit), visit 2/Day 28, and visit 3/End of Study (Day 60). At visit 1, approximately 80 eligible patients will be randomized 1:1 into 2 treatment groups of 40 each after meeting the eligibility criteria. A total of 40 patients will be enrolled in the centhaquine group (Group 1) and a total of 40 patients in the control group (Group 2):

  • Group 1 (Active Group): Centhaquine (Dose: 0.01 mg/kg) + Standard of care
  • Group 2 (Control group): Equal volume of Normal Saline + Standard of care In both treatment groups, patients will be provided with the standard of care. Centhaquine or Equal volume of Normal Saline will be administered intravenously after randomization to patients meeting the eligibility criteria. In the centhaquine group, centhaquine (0.01 mg/kg) dose will be administered as an intravenous (IV) infusion over 1 hour in 100 mL of normal saline. An additional dose of centhaquine will be administered on Day 2 if oxygenation and/or vasopressor support is required, but not before 24 hours of the previous dose (maximum 2 doses at an interval of 24 hours can be administered). In the control group, equal volume of normal saline will be administered as an intravenous (IV) infusion over 1 hour post-randomization. Conditions of administration will remain the same as for the centhaquine group. All subjects will be closely monitored during and after infusion. Vital signs will be monitored every 10 minutes during infusion. In the event of worsening hemodynamics or respiratory status, the infusion will be discontinued. Each subject will be monitored closely and followed up throughout his/her hospitalization. Moreover, he/she will be assessed for safety and efficacy parameters over 60 days from randomization.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

A subject will be eligible for inclusion in the study if he/she fulfills the following criteria:

  • Adult male or female aged 18 years or older
  • Hospitalized in the ICU diagnosed with moderate to severe ARDS having a PaO2/FiO2 ratio of < 200 mmHg or the SPO2/FiO2 ratio of ≤ 235( if SPO2 ≤ 97 %) with PEEP ≥ 5 cm H20 include the patient receiving invasive /non-invasive ventilation (NIV/CPAP).
  • The first dose of the study drug should be administered within 48 hours of confirming moderate to severe ARDS.
  • Requires vasopressor support
  • Written informed consent

Exclusion criteria

A subject will not be eligible for inclusion in this study if he/she meets any of the following exclusion criteria:

  • Receiving or expected to receive extracorporeal membrane oxygenation or high-frequency oscillatory ventilation
  • Confirmed pregnancy
  • Breast feeding
  • Participating in another interventional study
  • Requires or having the renal replacement therapy
  • Hepatic failure (Child-Pugh scores B and C)

Treatment and study plan

normal saline

Drug

Placebo (Dose: equal volume saline) + Standard of care

Other names: Vehicle

Centhaquine

Drug

Centhaquine (Dose: 0.01 mg/kg) + Standard of care

Other names: PMZ-2010

Primary outcomes

  1. Improvement of PaO2/FiO2 ratio ≥200 mmHg or relative increase by 50 mmHg from baseline

    Time frame: 3 days

    The study's primary objective is to determine the clinical effect of centhaquine in patients with moderate to severe ARDS.

Secondary outcomes

  1. 28-day all-cause mortality

    Time frame: 28 days

    Incidence of 28-day all-cause mortality

  2. 60-day all-cause mortality

    Time frame: 60 days

    Incidence of 60-day all-cause mortality

  3. Time to clinical improvement on WHO 8-point ordinal scale

    Time frame: 60 days

    Time to clinical improvement on WHO 8-point ordinal scale (ranging from 1-Ambulatory to 8-Death)

  4. Hospital free days

    Time frame: 28 days

    Hospital free days [Time frame: The number of days beginning with the day of randomization counted as "Day 1" through Day 28]

  5. ICU free days

    Time frame: 28 days

    • ICU free days [Time frame: The number of days beginning with the day of randomization counted as "Day 1" through Day 28]
  6. Ventilator free days (VFDs)

    Time frame: 28 days

    Ventilator free days (VFDs) in hospital [Time frame: The number of days beginning with the day of the episode counted as "Day 1 through Day 28, during which the patient is being cared for in the hospital]

  7. Days alive free of renal replacement therapy

    Time frame: 28 days

    • Days alive free of renal replacement therapy [Time frame: The number of days beginning with the day of randomization counted as "Day 1" through Day 28]
  8. Days alive free of vasopressor(s)

    Time frame: 28 days

    Days alive free of vasopressor(s) [Time frame: The number of days beginning with the day of randomization counted as "Day 1" through Day 28]

  9. A ≥ 50% reduction in vasopressor(s) (norepinephrine equivalents; NEE) dose.

    Time frame: 3 days

    The proportion of patients who have a ≥ 50% reduction of vasopressor(s) (norepinephrine equivalent; NEE) dose from the time of randomization [Time frame: 24 hours, 48 hours, 72 hours from the time of randomization].

  10. Change in blood lactate

    Time frame: 3 days

    Change in blood lactate [Time frame: Day 1 through Day 3]

  11. Change in Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) Score

    Time frame: 9 days

    • Change in Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score [Time frame: baseline through Day 9 or at the time of hospital discharge, whichever is earlier.]
  12. Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs)

    Time frame: 28 days

    Proportion of patients with adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs)

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Anil Gulati, MD, PhD

CONTACT

[email protected]

6307806087

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Pharmazz, Inc.

Industry

Registry information

Official study title

A Multicentric, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of Centhaquine as an Adjuvant to the Standard of Care in Patients With Moderate to Severe Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS)

Important dates

Study start
2026
Primary completion
2026
Study completion
2026
First posted
Feb 15, 2022
Registry last updated
Apr 14, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.