Central/Peripheral
ProcedureCentral versus peripheral location of the primary tumor
NCT Number: NCT02730897
Five papers showed a lower N1 nodal upstaging with video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) compared to open surgery in patients with cStage-I NSCLC . This finding questions the oncologic quality of minimal invasive lung cancer surgery, especially the quality of hilar and intrapulmonary lymh node dissection. However, these retrospective studies did not include analysis of central tumor location, although central tumors have a reported higher chance of N1 upstaging . Possibly, this creates a selection bias as surgeons might select central lesions deliberately for open surgery in line with initial VATS feasibility reports
Looking for future studies?
Notify MeAll sexes
Observational
After optimal preoperative staging, 10 to 25% of patients with clinical stage I (cStage-I) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are found to have unforeseen positive lymph nodes during resection.
Central tumors, even if they are smaller than 3cm (cT1), have a higher incidence of both intrapulmonary or hilar (N1) or ipsilateral mediastinal (N2) lymph node involvement in comparison to peripheral lesions.
In a cohort of patients that underwent identical preoperative mediastinal evaluation and postoperative pathologic tissue examination of equal quality, nodal upstaging can be used as a quality indicator of oncologic thoracic surgery. Or, it can be used as an instrument to compare different techniques, such as thoracoscopic (VATS) versus open lung resections for lung cancer.
Five papers showed a lower N1 nodal upstaging with video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) compared to open surgery. These retrospective studies did not include tumor location.
The investigators hypothesize that this creates a bias as surgeons might have chosen an open approach when the tumor was centrally located. This is in line with initial feasibility reports and guidelines that excluded patients with central lesions. This results in a higher prevalence of positive N1 nodes in patients operated with the open approach.
Our single centre analysis showed a one in three chance of nodal upstaging in central located cStage-I tumors , multivariate analysis showed central location to be the only significant predictor for upstaging, and not the surgical technique.
The aim of this multicentric study is to investigate risk factors for nodal upstaging, including tumor location, in patients with cStage-I NSCLC and validate previous findings.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Central versus peripheral location of the primary tumor
Time frame: immediate postoperative
Incidence of nodal (N1 and N2) upstaging stratified by 'central' versus 'peripheral' tumor location
Time frame: 1 yr postoperative
To compare survival after resection by open technique or VATS, stratified for the above predictors
University Hospital, Gasthuisberg
Other
Acronym: NUTS
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05375994
Advanced Cancer, Bronchial Neoplasms
San Francisco, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT04939324
Bronchial Neoplasms, Carcinoma, Bronchogenic
Limoges, France
View Trial DetailsNCT00818558
Bronchial Neoplasms, Carcinoma, Bronchogenic
Nice, France
View Trial DetailsNCT06196424
Bronchial Neoplasms, Carcinoma, Bronchogenic
Milan, Italy
View Trial Details