Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT01153217

Multicentre Study To Assess Changes In Bone Mineral Density Of The Switch From Tenofovir To Abacavir In Hiv-1-Infected Subjects With Loss Of Bone Mineral Density

Most of studies have not found any consistent drug-specific association with bone loss and controversial data with respect the effect of protease inhibitors (PIs) have been published. The more evident finding with respect to this issue is the more pronounced decrease of bone mineral density (BMD) in patients during the first weeks of receiving a tenofovir (TDF)-containing regimen, probably by the effect of TDF on phosphorus balance and vitamin D metabolism.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

About this study

The prevalence of osteoporosis in HIV-infected patients could be more than three times greater compared with HIV-uninfected subjects, according to the results of a meta-analytical review of cross-sectional published studies. The analysis includes data from 884 HIV-infected patients and 654 HIV-uninfected controls. Sixty-seven percent of HIV population had reduced bone mineral density (BMD), of whom 15% had osteoporosis (OR of 6.4 and 3.7, respectively, compared with HIV-uninfected controls).

In the same meta-analysis, when authors evaluated the role of antiretroviral therapy (ART) on BMD, comparing 202 antiretroviral-naive with 824 ART-treated patients, patients on treatment had a 2.5-fold increased odds of prevalent reduced BMD and osteoporosis. And finally, when 410 non-protease inhibitor (PI)-treated HIV patients were compared with 791 patients receiving a PI-containing regimen, those on PIs had increased odds of reduced BMD and osteoporosis.

As well, other studies support data of an impaired BMD in HIV-infected patients after starting antiretroviral therapy. These results let us confirm that HIV itself and antiretroviral therapy contribute to decrease the BMD.

However, most of studies have not found any consistent drug-specific association with bone loss and controversial data with respect the effect of PIs have been published. The more evident finding with respect to this issue is the more pronounced decrease of BMD in patients during the first weeks of receiving a tenofovir (TDF)-containing regimen, probably by the effect of TDF on phosphorus balance and vitamin D metabolism.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Adult patients (=/+18 years old) having a diagnosis of HIV-1 infection.
  • Current HAART including tenofovir plus emtricitabine/lamivudine plus a PI, a NNRTI or raltegravir started at least 12 months before.
  • T-score ≤-2 measured by DEXA (within the last 6 months).
  • Maintained undetectable plasma HIV-1 RNA (VL < 50 copies/mL) for at least 12 months.
  • Absence of suspected or documented resistance mutations in the RT associated to abacavir.
  • Voluntary written informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

  • History of intolerance, toxicity or virological failure to abacavir.
  • HLA B*5701 positive.
  • Secondary osteoporosis/osteopenia (vitamin D or testosterone deficit, thyroid disease, …)
  • Therapy with biphosphonates within the last 12 months.

Treatment and study plan

Switch from tenofovir to abacavir

Drug

Switch from tenofovir to abacavir

Other names: Abacavir

Primary outcomes

  1. Bone mineral density

    Time frame: From baseline to week 48

  2. t-score change

    Time frame: From baseline to week 48

Secondary outcomes

  1. viral load

    Time frame: Evolution from baseline to week 48

  2. CD4 T lymphocytes count

    Time frame: Evolution from baseline to week 48

  3. Resistance test

    Time frame: If virological failure occurs

  4. Lipid parameters (total, HDL-, LDL-cholesterol and triglyceride levels)

    Time frame: Evolution from baseline to week 48

  5. Adverse Events

    Time frame: From baseline to week 48

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Germans Trias i Pujol Hospital

Other

Registry information

Important dates

Study start
2010
Primary completion
2012
Study completion
2012
First posted
Jun 30, 2010
Registry last updated
Oct 17, 2012

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.