Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT01966822

Multicentre Study To Assess Changes In Bone Mineral Density Of The Switch From Protease Inhibitors To Dolutegravir In HIV-1-Infected Subjects With Low Bone Mineral Density

Protease inhibitors (PI) have been associated with an acceleration of bone mineral density loss in HIV-infected individuals because of an enhanced osteoclast activity, although some controversial data have been also published. A first study suggest an increase of bone mineral density after switching from PI to raltegravir, the first generation integrase inhibitor, but there are no more data about this subject.

Based on data that PI decrease bone mineral density by accelerating osteoclast cells and that the discontinuation of this drugs could improve bone mineralization, we propose a randomized prospective multicenter study to assess the impact of switching from PI to dolutegravir on bone mineral density in patients with low bone mineral density receiving a PI-containing regimen. At the same time, the study will help to assess the antiviral efficacy and safety of a PI-sparing regimen including dolutegravir as a simplification strategy in virologically suppressed patients.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

About this study

The second generation integrase inhibitor dolutegravir has demonstrated good virological and immunological outcomes in antiretroviral-naive subjects, compared with efavirenz, (SPRING 1 study). As well, it is active against HIV strains resistant to first-generation inhibitors raltegravir and elvitegravir in heavily treatment-experienced patients (VIKING study).

Additionally, it was safe and well tolerated after two years of use. It is administered once daily with no need for boosting, no food requirements and has a long half-life. The easy posology and its pharmacokinetics, together with the antiviral potency, make this drug a good alternative as a simplification approach. However, no clinical data are available supporting the switch of protease inhibitors or no nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors to dolutegravir in virologically suppressed HIV-treated subjects.

Protease inhibitors (PI) have been associated with an acceleration of bone mineral density loss in HIV-infected individuals because of an enhanced osteoclast activity, although some controversial data have been also published. A first study suggest an increase of bone mineral density after switching from PI to raltegravir, the first generation integrase inhibitor, but there are no more data about this subject.

Based on data that PI decrease bone mineral density by accelerating osteoclast cells and that the discontinuation of this drugs could improve bone mineralization, we propose a randomized prospective multicenter study to assess the impact of switching from PI to dolutegravir on bone mineral density in patients with low bone mineral density receiving a PI-containing regimen. At the same time, the study will help to assess the antiviral efficacy and safety of a PI-sparing regimen including dolutegravir as a simplification strategy in virologically suppressed patients.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • HIV-infected patients over 18 years.
  • In current antiretroviral therapy with abacavir and lamivudine (Kivexa) plus ritonavir-boosted PI, at least 6 months.
  • Viral suppression (HIV RNA <50 copies / ml) for at least 12 months.
  • T-score ≤ -1 evaluated by DEXA (done in the last 6 months).
  • Signed informed consent.
  • In potential childbearing women, commitment to use barrier contraceptive method throughout the study.

Exclusion criteria

  • Suspected or documented resistance to integrase inhibitors or reverse transcriptase inhibitors, nucleoside analogues.
  • Osteoporosis / osteopenia secondary (testosterone deficiency, thyroid disease ...), except vitamin D deficiency
  • Treatment with bisphosphonates in the last 6 months.
  • Have used integrase inhibitors
  • Pregnant or breastfeeding.
  • Patients with alanine aminotransferase (ALT)> 5 times the upper limit of normal (ULN) or ALT ≥ 3 times ULN and bilirubin ≥ 1.5 times ULN (direct bilirubin> 35%)
  • Patients with severe hepatic dysfunction (Class B or C) according to the Child-Pugh classification
  • Patients infected with hepatitis B virus (HBV) who can not use entecavir or telbivudine.
  • Patients infected with hepatitis C virus (HCV) in which is expected to begin treatment during the study.

Treatment and study plan

Dolutegravir, 50mg every 24 hours

Drug

Dolutegravir, 50mg every 24 hours

Protease Inhibitor/ritonavir

Drug

Protease Inhibitor/ritonavir

Primary outcomes

  1. Compare changes in Bone Mineral Density (BMO) measured by Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry

    Time frame: From Baseline to week 48

  2. Compare changes in femur T-score measured by DEXA

    Time frame: From Baseline to week 48

  3. Compare changes in lumbar spine (L1-L4) T-score measured by DEXA

    Time frame: From Baseline to week 48

Secondary outcomes

  1. HIV-1 viral load

    Time frame: Baseline

  2. HIV-1 viral load

    Time frame: week 4

  3. HIV-1 viral load

    Time frame: week 12

  4. HIV-1 viral load

    Time frame: week 24

  5. HIV-1 viral load

    Time frame: week 48

  6. CD4+/CD8+ T lymphocytes count.

    Time frame: Baseline

  7. CD4+/CD8+ T lymphocytes count.

    Time frame: week 4

  8. CD4+/CD8+ T lymphocytes count.

    Time frame: week 12

  9. CD4+/CD8+ T lymphocytes count.

    Time frame: week 24

  10. CD4+/CD8+ T lymphocytes count.

    Time frame: week 48

  11. Genotypic test if virological failure occurs.

    Time frame: From baseline to week 48

  12. Compare changes in total cholesterol

    Time frame: at week 48 relative to baseline values

  13. Compare changes in HDL cholesterol

    Time frame: at week 48 relative to baseline values

  14. Compare changes in LDL cholesterol

    Time frame: at week 48 relative to baseline values

  15. Compare changes in triglyceride levels.

    Time frame: at week 48 relative to baseline values

  16. Compare changes in filtrate glomerular rate by MDRD equation

    Time frame: at week 48 relative to baseline values

  17. Compare changes in creatinine

    Time frame: at week 48 relative to baseline values

  18. Compare changes in albumine/creatinine ratio

    Time frame: at week 48 relative to baseline values

  19. Compare changes in proteinuria/creatinine ratio

    Time frame: at week 48 relative to baseline values

  20. Adverse events related to antiretroviral treatment (Toxicity).

    Time frame: From Baseline to week 48

  21. Patient withdrawal

    Time frame: From Baseline to week 48

  22. Compare changes in osteocalcin

    Time frame: at week 48 relative to baseline values

  23. Compare changes in alkaline phosphatase

    Time frame: at week 48 relative to baseline values

  24. Compare changes in telopeptide

    Time frame: at week 48 relative to baseline values

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Fundación FLS de Lucha Contra el Sida, las Enfermedades Infecciosas y la Promoción de la Salud y la Ciencia

Other

Registry information

Important dates

Study start
2014
Primary completion
2015
Study completion
2015
First posted
Oct 22, 2013
Registry last updated
Nov 30, 2015

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.