NCT Number: NCT02056353
Multicentre LOGIC-Insulin Algorithm-guided Versus Nurse-directed Blood Glucose Control During Critical Illness (LOGIC-2)
Most critically ill patients are confronted with hyperglycaemia, which is associated with an increased mortality and morbidity risk. Normalising these elevated blood glucose levels by intensive insulin therapy may improve patient outcome, but is associated with an increased risk of hypoglycaemia. The LOGIC-2 study hypothesises that the LOGIC-Insulin computerised software algorithm will allow better (less hyperglycaemia) and safer (less hypoglycaemia) blood glucose control in critically ill patients than nurse-directed blood glucose control.
Looking for future studies?
Notify MeKey information
Conditions
Age range
18 year and older
Sex eligibility
All sexes
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Not applicable
Primary location
Jessa Hospital, Hasselt, Belgium
Who can participate
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
- Patients admitted to the ICU with an expected stay of at least 48 hours and already receiving or potentially needing insulin infusion for blood glucose control. These patients should already have or need an arterial and central venous line
- Patients should be 18 years or older
Exclusion criteria
- Not critically ill
- Age under 18 years
- Patients already enrolled in another intervention randomized controlled trial
- Patients expected to die within 12 hours (=moribund patients)
- No arterial line or central venous line needed
- Pregnancy or lactating
- Patients suffering from ketoacidotic or hyperosmolar coma on admission
- Patients who have been previously been included in the LOGIC-2 study
- Allergy to insulin
Treatment and study plan
Paper protocol
DevicePrimary outcomes
-
Glycemic Penalty Index (GPI) during the Intervention
Time frame: up to 14 days post-randomization
Adequacy of reaching and maintaining the target range for blood glucose during the intervention (Effectiveness of glycaemic control)
Secondary outcomes
-
Proportion of Patients With Severe Hypoglycaemia (<40 mg/dL) during the Intervention
Time frame: up to 14 days post-randomization
Proportion of patients to have had one or more episodes of severe hypoglycaemia (<40 mg/dL) during the intervention
-
Incidence of Severe Hypoglycemia (<40 mg/dL) during the Intervention
Time frame: up to 14 days post-randomization
Number of severe hypoglycaemic values as a fraction of all blood glucose measurements during the intervention
-
Blood Glucose Level Per Treatment Group during the Intervention
Time frame: up to 14 days post-randomization
Mean and median arterial blood glucose level
-
Hyperglycaemic index (HGI)
Time frame: up to 14 days post-randomization
Adequacy of reaching and maintaining the target range for blood glucose, as assessed by the Hyperglycaemic index (HGI)
-
Time in target range
Time frame: up to 14 days post-randomization
-
Time to target range
Time frame: up to 14 days post-randomization
-
Daily maximal blood glucose difference
Time frame: up to 14 days post-randomization
marker of blood glucose fluctuations
-
Incidence of mild hypoglycaemia (blood glucose level < 70 mg/dL or 3.9 mmol/L) during the Intervention
Time frame: up to 14 days post-randomization
Number of mild hypoglycaemic values as a fraction of all blood glucose measurements during the intervention
-
Proportion of Patients With Mild Hypoglycaemia (blood glucose level < 70 mg/dL or 3.9 mmol/L) during the Intervention
Time frame: up to 14 days post-randomization
Proportion of patients to have had one or more episodes of mild hypoglycaemia during the intervention
-
Interval between blood glucose measurements
Time frame: up to 14 days post-randomization
marker of workload
-
Protocol compliance in the intervention group
Time frame: up to 14 days post-randomization
the number and proportion of patients in which the LOGIC-Insulin was not followed for a time period of at least 8 hours, which is the duration of one nurse shift.
-
Overrules in the intervention group
Time frame: up to 14 days post-randomization
the number and proportions of recommendations by the software that were overruled by the bed-side nurses
- Minor overrules: absolute insulin dose difference of >0.1 and < 1IU/h
- Major overrules: absolute insulin dose difference of >= 1IU/h
- Major overrules will also be qualitatively assessed
-
Incidence of new infections in the ICU
Time frame: up to 90 days post-randomization
The diagnosis of "new infection" will be based on the administration of antibiotics, beyond the prophylactic scope
-
Length of stay in the ICU
Time frame: up to 90 days post-randomization
-
Length of stay in the hospital
Time frame: up to 90 days post-randomization
-
Mortality in the ICU
Time frame: up to 90 days post-randomization
-
Mortality in the hospital
Time frame: up to 90 days post-randomization
-
Landmark 90-day mortality
Time frame: up to 90 days post-randomization
-
All direct medical costs from a healthcare payer's perspective
Time frame: up to 90 days post-randomization
-
Quality of Life
Time frame: up to 90 days post-randomization
EuroQol-5D
Sponsors and collaborators
Lead sponsor
KU Leuven
Other
Collaborators
- Agentschap voor Innovatie door Wetenschap en Technologie
Registry information
Official study title
LOGIC-Insulin Computerized Algorithm-guided Versus Nurse-directed Blood Glucose Control in Critically Ill Patients: the LOGIC-2 Multicentre Randomized Controlled Trial
Acronym: LOGIC-2
Important dates
- Study start
- 2014
- Primary completion
- 2015
- Study completion
- 2015
- First posted
- Feb 6, 2014
- Registry last updated
- Jan 8, 2016
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Related clinical trials
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
GLUCOSAFE 2 - A New Tool for Nutritional Management and Insulin-therapy in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU)
NCT03890432
Critical Illness, Deficiency Diseases
Geneva, Canton of Geneva, Switzerland
View Trial DetailsContinuous Glucose Monitoring for Hyperglycemia in Critically Ill Patients
NCT05442853
Critical Illness, Diabetes Mellitus
Gainesville, Florida, United States
View Trial DetailsComputerized Glucose Control in Critically Ill Patients
NCT01002482
Critical Illness, Disease Attributes
Amiens, France
View Trial DetailsNormoglycaemia in Intensive Care Evaluation and Survival Using Glucose Algorithm Regulation (NICE - SUGAR STUDY)
NCT00220987
Critical Illness, Disease Attributes
Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia
View Trial Details