Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT06379737

Multi-systemic Rehabilitative Interventions in Long COVID-19 Patients in Two Different Settings: a Randomized Controlled Trial

Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of a multisystem rehabilitation program for Long Covid patients in two different settings.

Design: Randomized controlled trial. Settings: Health resort and home-based. Participants: 72 Long Covid patients. Interventions: Patients were randomly assigned into two groups: Group A (n=36) received health resort intervention, and Group B (n=36) received home-based care. Both groups underwent a 5-week rehabilitation program, involving motor, respiratory, and cognitive exercises, two sessions per week.

Outcomes: Assessments were conducted before (T0) and after treatment (T1), at 3 (T2) and 6 months (T3), including respiratory and physical function, handgrip strength, fatigue, pain, quality of life, psychological function, and satisfaction.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

About this study

At the outpatient clinics of the Neurorehabilitation Unit of the University Hospital of Padua, 103 patients were initially assessed. Out of these patients, 72 subjects of both genders with medium-to-long-term outcomes following previous infection with the SARS-CoV-2 virus were recruited for this study. Eight patients were excluded from the study due to initial assessments revealing conditions falling under exclusion criteria (1 patient lacked a prior diagnosis with a COVID-19 infection swab, 2 had concurrent tumor pathologies, 3 exhibited systemic inflammation, and 2 had skin infections), and 23 patients chose to undergo a rehabilitation program at a rehabilitative gym instead. Participants were randomly assigned to one of two rehabilitation treatment groups: the group treated at a health resort facility (Group A, n=36) and the group performing the exercise program at home (Group B, n=36). However, 6 patients did not complete follow-up assessments at different time points, resulting in the final evaluation of data collected from 66 patients, with 33 allocated to Group A and 33 to Group B (Fig. 1).

The patient enrollment was conducted between January 2023 and April 2023. Patients in group A underwent a 5-week rehabilitation cycle with two weekly sessions, totaling 10 sessions, in a health resort setting. The patients underwent treatments at two health resort facilities located in the Euganean Basin, Veneto, Italy, equipped with pools of the same depth, size, and water type. Patients in group B underwent a 5-week rehabilitation cycle at home with two weekly sessions, totaling 10 sessions.

At the beginning (T0) and at the end (T1) of the treatment, and during two subsequent follow-up times at 3 months (T2) and 6 months (T3), after the end of the treatment, patients in both groups were evaluated.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

The inclusion criteria for the study included the following requirements: age between 18 and 75 years; a previous COVID-19 infection occurring between 6 and 18 months before our initial assessment; negative results in tests for the nucleic acid of the SARS-CoV-2 virus conducted on respiratory samples, such as oropharyngeal swabs; body temperature ≤ 37°C; presence of reduced cardio-respiratory capacity and/or motor deficits caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus infection; manifestation of possible cognitive symptoms that could not be attributed to other conditions; no participation in cycles of thermal mineral-rich therapy in the six months preceding the study.

Exclusion criteria

from the study included: inability to understand and sign the informed consent form; absence of a previous positive detection of nucleic acid of the SARS-CoV-2 virus in tests on respiratory samples; current positivity for the nucleic acid of the SARS-CoV-2 virus in respiratory samples; epilepsy, severe psychiatric disorders, neoplasms, or pregnancy. Moreover, commonly recognized contraindications for health resort treatments, such as skin infections or open wounds, systemic inflammation, heart, liver, respiratory, or kidney failure, and urinary or fecal incontinence, were considered additional exclusion criteria.

Treatment and study plan

Multi-systemic Rehabilitation

Behavioral

Patients in group A underwent a 5-week rehabilitation cycle with two weekly sessions, totaling 10 sessions, in a health resort setting. The patients underwent treatments at two health resort facilities located in the Euganean Basin, Veneto, Italy, equipped with pools of the same depth, size, and water type. Each session was structured into four components:

  • thermal mineral-rich aerosol therapy (10 minutes);
  • dryland motor, respiratory, and proprioceptive rehabilitation in the gym (30 minutes);
  • mineral-rich aquatic aerobic, strengthening, and balance exercises (30 minutes);
  • cognitive enhancement interventions (30 minutes). Inhalation treatments and aquatic exercises utilized thermal mineral-rich water, specifically salsobromoiodic water, naturally springing at approximately 80°C and used in pools at a temperature of around 36°C. The chemical-physical properties of the thermal mineral-rich water employed are reported in Table I.

Patients in group B underwent a 5-week rehabilit

Primary outcomes

  1. Numerical Rating Scale (NRS)

    Time frame: immediately before and after intervention and 3 and 6 months follow-ups

    a commonly used pain assessment tool that involves asking patients to rate their pain verbally or visually on a scale from 0 to 10, with 0 indicating no pain and 10 representing the worst possible pain

  2. Hand grip strength

    Time frame: immediately before and after intervention and 3 and 6 months follow-ups

    the strength of the dominant hand was assessed using a digital handheld dynamometer

  3. Barthel Dyspnea Scale

    Time frame: immediately before and after intervention and 3 and 6 months follow-ups

    The Barthel Dyspnea Scale is a validated tool used to measure the severity of dyspnea. It evaluates various activities and tasks that may provoke dyspnea, allowing to assess and monitor the impact of dyspnea on a patient's daily life

  4. Fatigue Assessment Scale

    Time frame: immediately before and after intervention and 3 and 6 months follow-ups

    a self-report questionnaire designed to assess the severity and impact of fatigue. It consists of 10 items, describing different aspects of fatigue.

  5. Beck's Depression Inventory (BDI

    Time frame: immediately before and after intervention and 3 and 6 months follow-ups

    the BDI is a 21-item, self-report rating inventory that measures characteristic attitudes and symptoms of depression

  6. Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI)

    Time frame: immediately before and after intervention and 3 and 6 months follow-ups

    the BAI is a self-report questionnaire designed to assess the severity of anxiety symptoms and consists of 21 items that measure various aspects of anxiety

  7. 12-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-12)

    Time frame: immediately before and after intervention and 3 and 6 months follow-ups

    The SF-12 is employed for assessing health-related quality of life (HRQoL). It is a shortened version of the SF-36, consisting of 12 items that measure eight health domains, including physical functioning, limitations due to physical health problems, bodily pain, general health perception, vitality, social functioning, limitations due to emotional problems, and mental health

Secondary outcomes

  1. Patients satisfaction

    Time frame: immediately after intervention

    Specifically designed questionnaire (Likert scale)

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Padua University General Hospital

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Valutazione Degli Esiti a Medio-lungo Termine Della Sindrome Long Covid in Pazienti Trattati Con un Protocollo di Riabilitazione in Ambiente Termale o in Teleriabilitazione

Acronym: MULTI-COVID

Important dates

Study start
2023
Primary completion
2023
Study completion
2023
First posted
Apr 23, 2024
Registry last updated
Apr 23, 2024

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.