Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Not Yet Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT06791057

Multi-site Trial of a Brief Behavioral Intervention for Dyspnea in Patients With Advanced Lung Cancer

Dyspnea, or breathlessness, is one of the most common and distressing symptoms experienced by patients with advanced lung cancer. The purpose of this multi-site trial is to test the effectiveness of a dyspnea intervention (called BREEZE+) that includes three brief nurse-delivered sessions and access to a digital health app that teaches and reinforces patients' use of skills for managing and coping with this highly debilitating symptom. This study will lay the groundwork for a follow-up pragmatic implementation trial integrating BREEZE+ into usual oncology care for patients with advanced lung cancer experiencing dyspnea.

Not Yet Recruiting

Trial opening soon.

Get Notified

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

University of Miami, Coral Gables, Florida, United States

Loading trial locations.

About this study

The goal of this study is to improve dyspnea, one of the most common and debilitating symptoms experienced by patients with advanced lung cancer. Despite improvements in survival from novel targeted therapy and immunotherapy for patients with advanced lung cancer, the proportion of patients experiencing dyspnea (i.e., difficulty breathing) has not decreased. In fact, recent data show that the prevalence of dyspnea is now over 70%, higher than estimates reported in older cohorts. Although cancer burden, such as extensive disease in the lung or pleural effusions, certainly causes and exacerbates symptoms of breathlessness, psychological factors also underlie the experience of dyspnea. Patient-reported dyspnea is associated with impaired quality of life, decreased functioning at home and work, withdrawal from social activities, heightened symptoms of anxiety and depression, and even a desire for hastened death. Moreover, dyspnea leads to unscheduled visits to oncology clinics and the emergency department, often resulting in hospitalization. Recognizing the notable impact of breathlessness on patient functioning and health care utilization, the Quality Oncology Practice Initiative for the American Society of Clinical Oncology identified the assessment and management of dyspnea as a key measure of quality cancer care. Unfortunately, data are limited to support efficacious treatments for dyspnea. While clinicians commonly prescribe opioids to treat breathlessness, recent systematic reviews concluded that pharmacologic management did not improve dyspnea and carried potential harm. In a recent Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Comparative Effectiveness Review of non-pharmacological interventions for dyspnea, the authors reported that behavioral and multicomponent interventions involving physical activity or rehabilitation hold the greatest promise for addressing dyspnea, despite having low strength of evidence to date. Therefore, comprehensive approaches to care incorporating behavioral interventions for dyspnea are greatly needed, given the degree of patient suffering and the lack of evidence-based protocols. To address this evidence gap, the investigators developed a brief, two-session behavioral intervention for dyspnea management in patients with advanced lung cancer called, "BREEZE." To ensure the potential for broad dissemination of BREEZE, the investigators purposefully limited the number of sessions, trained oncology nurses to serve as interventionists, and successfully transitioned to fully remote delivery during the pandemic. The investigators completed a single-center randomized controlled efficacy trial of BREEZE versus usual care in patients with advanced lung cancer and self-reported dyspnea. Patients assigned to BREEZE reported significant improvements in the primary outcome of self-reported dyspnea and functional wellbeing at week eight. However, intervention effects were not sustained by the six-month follow-up time point. The investigators now propose to build upon these encouraging findings by conducting a multi-site trial of BREEZE in a diverse patient population. Moreover, the investigators have enhanced the intervention by adding a nurse-led booster session and integrating the dyspnea management components from a digital health app that their team developed for patients with advanced lung cancer, to reinforce BREEZE's evidence-based skills and to sustain intervention effects while preserving the "low-touch" for dissemination. The investigators propose to conduct a multi-site type I hybrid effectiveness-implementation trial of BREEZE plus the booster and digital health app (i.e., BREEZE+) versus an enhanced usual care control (entailing educational resources on dyspnea management) in 420 patients with advanced lung cancer reporting dyspnea. Massachusetts General Hospital, Johns Hopkins University, and the University of Miami will serve as study sites. The nurse-led sessions and digital health app components will be available in Spanish and English to enable the recruitment of a diverse sample, and the investigators will centralize intervention delivery to facilitate implementation. Data from this study will ultimately serve as the basis for a follow-up large-scale, multi-site dissemination trial of BREEZE+.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age ≥18 years
  • Diagnosis of advanced lung cancer (i.e., non-small cell lung cancer or small cell lung cancer) or mesothelioma, not being treated with curative intent
  • Self-report at least moderate dyspnea per a rating ≥4 on the validated 0-10 breathlessness item of the Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale-Revised
  • Functioning independently per an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status ≤2
  • Ability to read and respond to questions in English or Spanish
  • Receiving primary cancer care at one of the participating institutions

Exclusion criteria

  • Significant uncontrolled psychiatric disorder or other co-morbid disease (e.g., dementia, cognitive impairment), which the treating oncology clinician reports would prohibit the patient's ability to participate in study procedures.

Treatment and study plan

Dyspnea Intervention

Behavioral

Brief behavioral intervention for dyspnea management that includes three nurse-led sessions focused on psychoeducation, behavioral techniques for managing acute breathlessness, and relaxation training for reducing physiological stress as well as a digital health app to reinforce practice of breathing skills.

Enhanced Usual Care

Behavioral

Patients will receive educational materials on the management of symptoms of lung cancer and its treatment as well as any usual care for dyspnea deemed appropriate by the clinical team.

Primary outcomes

  1. Patient-reported Dyspnea

    Time frame: 8 weeks

    To compare patient-reported dyspnea between study groups at 8 weeks using the Modified Medical Research Council Dyspnea Scale, which is a one-item self-report scale to evaluate the degree of a patient's dyspnea (score range: 0-4), with a higher score indicating worse dyspnea.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Patient-reported Dyspnea-related Anxiety and Discomfort

    Time frame: 8 weeks

    To compare patient-reported dyspnea-related anxiety and discomfort between study groups at 8 weeks using the Cancer Dyspnea Scale, which is a 12-item self-report scale that assesses the multidimensional nature of dyspnea in patients with cancer (total scale score range: 0-48), with higher scores reflecting worse dyspnea-related effort, anxiety, and physical discomfort.

  2. Patient-reported Physical Function

    Time frame: 8 weeks

    To compare patient-reported physical function between study groups at 8 weeks using the PROMIS Physical Function 8b Short Form, which is an 8-item measure that evaluates self-perceived capability of one's upper dexterity, lower extremities, and activities of daily living (total scale raw score range: 8-40), with higher scores indicating a greater level of physical function.

  3. Patient-reported Quality of Life

    Time frame: 8 weeks

    To compare patient-reported quality of life between study groups at 8 weeks using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Lung Questionnaire, which is a 36-item self-report measure of physical, social, emotional, and functional wellbeing and lung-cancer specific symptoms (total scale score range: 0-136), with higher scores indicating better overall quality of life.

  4. Patient-reported Coping with Dyspnea

    Time frame: 8 Weeks

    To compare patient-reported coping with dyspnea between study groups at 8 weeks using the Chronic Respiratory Disease Questionnaire-Mastery Subscale, which is a 4-item measure assessing a patient's feeling of control and mastery over their dyspnea (score range: 1-7), with higher scores indicating greater perceived control in managing dyspnea.

Other outcomes

  1. Patient-reported Dyspnea

    Time frame: Up to 24 weeks

    To compare average trajectories between study groups in patient-reported dyspnea across all four study time points from baseline to weeks 8, 16, and 24 using the Modified Medical Research Council Dyspnea Scale, which is a one-item self-report scale to evaluate the degree of a patient's dyspnea (score range: 0-4), with a higher score indicating worse dyspnea.

  2. Patient-reported Dyspnea-related Anxiety and Discomfort

    Time frame: Up to 24 weeks

    To compare average trajectories between study groups in patient-reported dyspnea-related anxiety and discomfort across all four study time points from baseline to weeks 8, 16, and 24 using the Cancer Dyspnea Scale, which is a 12-item self-report scale that assesses the multidimensional nature of dyspnea in patients with cancer (total scale score range: 0-48), with higher scores reflecting worse dyspnea-related effort, anxiety, and physical discomfort.

  3. Patient-reported Physical Function

    Time frame: Up to 24 weeks

    To compare average trajectories between study groups in patient-reported physical function across all four study time points from baseline to weeks 8, 16, and 24 using the PROMIS Physical Function 8b Short Form, which is an 8-item measure that evaluates self-perceived capability of one's upper dexterity, lower extremities, and activities of daily living (total scale raw score range: 8-40), with higher scores indicating a greater level of physical function.

  4. Patient-reported Quality of Life

    Time frame: Up to 24 weeks

    To compare average trajectories between study groups in patient-reported quality of life across all four study time points from baseline to weeks 8, 16, and 24 using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Lung Questionnaire, which is a 36-item self-report measure of physical, social, emotional, and functional wellbeing and lung-cancer specific symptoms (total scale score range: 0-136), with higher scores indicating better overall quality of life.

  5. Patient-reported Coping with Dyspnea

    Time frame: Up to 24 weeks

    To compare average trajectories between study groups in patient-reported coping with dyspnea across all four study time points from baseline to weeks 8, 16, and 24 using the Chronic Respiratory Disease Questionnaire-Mastery Subscale, which is a 4-item measure assessing a patient's feeling of control and mastery over their dyspnea (score range: 1-7), with higher scores indicating greater perceived control in managing dyspnea.

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Jennifer S. Temel, MD

CONTACT

[email protected]

617-724-4000

Joseph A. Greer, PhD

CONTACT

[email protected]

617-724-4000

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Massachusetts General Hospital

Other

Collaborators

  • Johns Hopkins University
  • National Cancer Institute (NCI)
  • University of Miami

Registry information

Acronym: BREEZE+

Important dates

Study start
2026
Primary completion
2029
Study completion
2030
First posted
Jan 24, 2025
Registry last updated
Jul 10, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.