Johns Hopkins University
Baltimore, Maryland, 21205, United States
NCT Number: NCT02279849
The overarching goal of B'More Healthy Retail Rewards (BHRR) is to develop, implement, and evaluate a pilot multi-level communications and pricing intervention to improve access to and consumption of healthy foods in low-income areas of Baltimore City, Maryland. BHRR has three primary aims: (1) to conduct formative research with representatives of multiple levels of the Baltimore food environment (i.e., local wholesalers, retail food store owners, and consumers) in order to select key foods for promotion, and determine appropriate communications and healthy food price reduction strategies, (2) to pilot the multi-level program with 2 local wholesale stores, and 24 small corner stores and their customers, and assess program implementation through detailed process evaluation, and (3) to assess impact of multilevel health communications and pricing strategies, combined and separately, on consumer dietary patterns and food source use, food purchasing behaviors, psychosocial variables, food security, and individual weight and height.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me21 year–100 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Baltimore, Maryland, 21205, United States
Innovative and culturally appropriate multilevel health communications interventions are desperately needed to address the chronic disease epidemic in high-risk populations, such as low-income urban African Americans. However, the vast majority of communications strategies have focused on educating individual consumers about healthy food choices, while in poor urban settings the lower availability of affordable healthy food choices greatly limits the impact of these messages. The study team worked with 1 wholesaler and 24 small retail food stores to develop and test novel strategies in Baltimore, Maryland, including: 1) multilevel health communications alone directed at wholesalers, retailers and low-income African American consumers intended to enhance willingness to stock and/or purchase healthy foods; 2) pricing strategies (performance based allowances) directed at wholesalers and retailers to increase their stocking of healthy foods at reduced prices; and 3) combined health communications and pricing strategies. Intervention strategies were tailored to meet the needs of the target populations based on formative research and stakeholder input. This research study is based on significant field experience in this setting, including the development of evaluation tools to assess change in stocking and pricing of key foods (at the store level), and psychosocial factors, dietary intake, and food purchasing behaviors (at the consumer level). There are 3 main study aims:
The proposed research seeks to develop effective, multilevel communication strategies to improve diet and reduce risk for diet-related chronic diseases. The study team anticipates this design will demonstrate the value of a multi-pronged and multilevel health communications approach to obesity and chronic disease prevention, and will lead to a large-scale trial and informed policies designed to improve food availability and affordability in low-income urban settings.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Communication materials were used to promote healthier items to consumers in corner stores.
The pricing incentives were used to help promote sales of healthier food items.
Communications with Pricing incentives were used to promote the sale/consumption of healthier foods.
Time frame: Up to 8 months
We analyzed the average change in consumer purchase of promoted foods and related consumer psychosocial variables across treatment groups from baseline and post-intervention by examine intervention effects by analyzing the change variable obtained by subtracting the pretest score from post-test score (exploratory analysis); and 2) conduct confirmatory testing of intervention effects using ANOVA and mixed models.
Time frame: Up to 8 months
We analyzed the average change in consumer dietary intake and consumption of promoted foods across treatment groups from baseline and post-intervention by examine intervention effects by analyzing the change variable obtained by subtracting the pretest score from post-test score (exploratory analysis); and 2) conduct confirmatory testing of intervention effects using ANOVA and mixed models.
Time frame: Up to 8 months
We analyzed the average change in store owner psychosocial variables to stock/sell promoted foods across treatment groups from baseline and post-intervention examine intervention effects by analyzing the change variable obtained by subtracting the pretest score from post-test score (exploratory analysis); and 2) conduct confirmatory testing of intervention effects using ANOVA and mixed models.
Time frame: Up to 8 months
We analyzed the average change in store sales of promoted foods across treatment groups from baseline and post-intervention examine intervention effects by analyzing the change variable obtained by subtracting the pretest score from post-test score (exploratory analysis); and 2) conduct confirmatory testing of intervention effects using ANOVA and mixed models.
Time frame: Up to 11 months
Average change in consumer consumer BMI across treatment groups from baseline and post-intervention.
Time frame: Up to 11 months
We analyzed the average change in consumer household food security, food assistance, health beliefs, socio-demographics across treatment groups from baseline and post-intervention examine intervention effects by analyzing the change variable obtained by subtracting the pretest score from post-test score (exploratory analysis); and 2) conduct confirmatory testing of intervention effects using ANOVA and mixed models.
Time frame: Up to 8 months
We analyzed the average change in wholesaler sales of promoted foods across treatment groups from baseline and post-intervention examine intervention effects by analyzing the change variable obtained by subtracting the pretest score from post-test score (exploratory analysis); and 2) conduct confirmatory testing of intervention effects using ANOVA and mixed models.
Time frame: Up to 8 months
Assessing the reach, dose, and fidelity of all intervention components from our post data collection instruments.
Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health
Other
Multi-level Communications and Access Strategies to Improve the Food Environment:B'More Healthy: Retailer Rewards (BHRR)
Acronym: BHRR
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT01040975
Behavior, Body Weight
Durham, North Carolina, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT00510341
Asthma, Behavior
Seattle, Washington, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06335810
Behavior, Body Weight
New York, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05742165
Behavior, Body Weight
New York, United States
View Trial Details