Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT06487390

Multi-component Intervention to Train Providers to Promote PrEP for Girls and Women in the Deep South

The goal of this study is to adapt evidence-based curriculum on HIV epidemiology and PrEP prescription to train family medicine physician trainees to take a thorough sexual history and discuss HIV/STI prevention and PrEP options with adolescent patients in Alabama. The primary outcomes of the study are:

* Feasibility of the PrEP Pro training intervention * Acceptability of the PrEP Pro training intervention

Secondary outcomes include:

* Behavioral changes in sexual history taking performed by physician trainees * PrEP knowledge and prescribing practices * HIV and STI screening practices

Participants will receive training on sexual history taking and HIV prevention options, including PrEP prescription and management. They will complete a pre-training survey (enrollment) and post-training survey (6 months post enrollment) to understand differences in knowledge and practice before and after receiving the training intervention. The post training survey will also assess acceptability and feasibility of the intervention. A subset of participants will complete qualitative in-depth interviews to further discuss their experiences with the program and suggestions for future adaptations.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • licensed HCP (MD, DO) trainee
  • providing medical care to AGYW in AL
  • working in a clinic setting where at least 20% of the population is Black
  • able/willing to provide informed consent

Exclusion criteria

(a) unable or unwilling to provide informed consent

Treatment and study plan

PrEP Pro training intervention

Behavioral

Training intervention adapted from evidence-based HIV epidemiology, sexual history taking, and PrEP prescription curricula.

Primary outcomes

  1. Feasibility of Intervention Implementation

    Time frame: 6 months

    Feasibility of Intervention: 4 items, 5-point Likert scale, scale values range from 1-5 with higher score meaning more feasible to implement

  2. Acceptability

    Time frame: 6 months

    Acceptability of Intervention: 4 items, 5-point Likert scale, scale values range from 1-5 with higher score meaning the intervention is more acceptable to participants

Secondary outcomes

  1. HIV Epidemiology Knowledge Assessment

    Time frame: 6 months

    Measured by baseline and 6-month (pre- and post-training) surveys; scores range from 0-100% based on the percentage of participants who answered all five questions related to HIV epidemiology correctly; higher percentages indicate that more participants knew the correct answer to all 5 HIV epidemiology questions.

  2. Sexual History Taking Practices

    Time frame: 6 months

    Measured by baseline survey. Sexual history taking knowledge, attitudes, and beliefs. 23 questions split into four subscales on 3-point Likert scale; each subscale score is the mean of the scores from the questions in the scale.

    Subscales: Attitudes (4 items), Skills (14), Barriers (2), Training (3). Strongly agree/Somewhat agree = 3, Neither agree nor disagree = 2, Strongly disagree/Somewhat disagree = 1 Higher score on 1-3 range indicates more positive attitude towards sexual history assessment, higher skill, more barriers, and better training.

  3. PrEP Knowledge, Willingness to Prescribe, Prescribing Practices

    Time frame: 6 months

    measured by baseline and 6-month (pre- and post-training) surveys, qualitative interviews, EMR data.

    The score ranges for each subscale varied (PrEP knowledge=0-20, attitudes=0-28, and beliefs=0-8), with high values on each subscale representing good knowledge or positive attitudes toward PrEP, respectively.

  4. STI Screening Practices

    Time frame: 6 months

    Percent of participants (providers) who reported they assessed sexual history and/or tested clients for STIs in the past week at least some of the time, by group (AGYW/ABYM).

    "At least some of the time" = answering "some, many, most, or all" (vs "none") to questions formatted like: Among the [AGYW/ABYM] seen last week, for about how many did you [assess sex Hx/test for STIs]?

    measured by BL and 6-month surveys, IDIs, EMR data; BL=baseline; AGYW=adolescent girls and young women (ages 14-24); ABYM=adolescent boys and young men (ages 14-24); sex Hx=assessed for sexual history; past wk=past 7 days

  5. HIV Screening Practices

    Time frame: 6 months

    Percent of participants (providers) who reported they tested clients for HIV in the past week at least some of the time, by group (AGYW/ABYM).

    "At least some of the time" = answering "some, many, most, or all" (vs "none") to questions formatted like: Among the [AGYW/ABYM] seen last week, for about how many did you [test for HIV]?

    measured by BL and 6-month surveys, IDIs, EMR data; BL=baseline; AGYW=adolescent girls and young women (ages 14-24); ABYM=adolescent boys and young men (ages 14-24); sex Hx=assessed for sexual history; past wk=past 7 days

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

University of Alabama at Birmingham

Other

Collaborators

  • National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)

Registry information

Official study title

PrEP Pro: Adapting a Multi-component Intervention to Train and Support Providers to Promote PrEP for Adolescent Girls and Young Women in the Deep South

Acronym: PrEP Pro

Important dates

Study start
2023
Primary completion
2024
Study completion
2024
First posted
Jul 5, 2024
Registry last updated
Dec 9, 2025

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.