Vacuum Compression Therapy for Chronic Lower Limb Ulcers
NCT07737184
Cardiovascular Diseases, Diabetes Complications
Ostrava, Czechia
View Trial DetailsNCT Number: NCT01676272
Despite the widespread use of advanced biologics for the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers, data comparing one type of modality to another are scarce. This investigation is a prospective randomized study comparing a bioengineered skin substitute to a human skin allograft.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–90 year
All sexes
Observational
Washington Hospital Wound Center, Washington, Pennsylvania, United States
The primary goal in treating a DFU is to obtain wound closure. Healing can be a lengthy and painful process for ulcers of diabetic etiology. Healing is often further complicated in subjects with diabetes by vascular compromise and peripheral ischemia, renal insufficiency and diminution of inflammatory responses
The two products to be compared in this study are both commonly used for the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers. DermaGraft is considered a medical device by the FDA, and was cleared for the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers in 1997. It is a staple for the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers, and is widely used throughout the United States. It is composed of an absorbable substrate that has been seeded with living human fibroblasts. Once formed, the graft is cryopreserved until it reaches the clinic, where it is defrosted and applied to the wound surface.
TheraSkin is composed of a split thickness skin graft harvested within 24 hours post-mortem, from an organ donor who has cleared the standard safety screenings. It is classified by the FDA as a donated tissue. Once harvested, the graft is sanitized according to FDA specifications, and cryopreserved, until it is delivered to the clinic for application to the foot ulcer. It is also a widely used treatment for diabetic foot ulcers.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
: Subjects are required to meet all of the following criteria for enrollment into the study and subsequent randomization.
Subject or responsible caregiver is willing and able to maintain the required off-loading (as applicable for the location of the ulcer) and applicable dressing changes.
-
Exclusion criteria
Subjects meeting any of the following criteria will be excluded from enrollment and subsequent randomization.
-
Time frame: 2 years
Despite the widespread use of advanced biologics for the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers, data comparing one type of modality to another are scarce. This investigation is a prospective randomized study comparing a bioengineered skin substitute to a human skin allograft.
Solsys Medical LLC
Industry
Proposal for a Multi- Center Site Randomized, Prospective Controlled Head-to-head Clinical Trial Comparing a Bioengineered Skin Substitute to a Human Skin Allograf
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07737184
Cardiovascular Diseases, Diabetes Complications
Ostrava, Czechia
View Trial DetailsNCT06319287
Cardiovascular Diseases, Diabetes Complications
Blue Ash, Ohio, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05579743
Cardiovascular Diseases, Diabetes Complications
Baltimore, Maryland, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05094037
Cardiovascular Diseases, Diabetes Complications
Chicago, Illinois, United States
View Trial Details