Ankara Yıldırım Beyazıt University, Faculty of Health Sciences,Department of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation
Ankara, Esenboğa, 06970, Turkey (Türkiye)
NCT Number: NCT06187571
To determine whether Mulligan mobilization with movement (MWM) and Conservative treatment CT give different results on pain, ROM, and functional activities in participants with shoulder problems.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Ankara, Esenboğa, 06970, Turkey (Türkiye)
Shoulder problems are one of the common orthopedic problems. Patients with shoulder problems experience an increase in pain and a decrease in joint movement and functionality. With conventional treatment, patients' symptoms improve. However, the MWM is one of the manual therapy techniques frequently used to reduce pain in musculoskeletal system problems. It is extremely important to evaluate patients' functionality after rehabilitation. Although there are studies comparing the effect of MWM in the literature, studies evaluating patient-specific functionality are also limited.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
The MWM technique was applied to the MWM group in addition to the CT. The MWM technique was applied in flexion, abduction, internal rotation, and external rotation directions. The MWM technique was performed with 3 sets of 10 repetitions.
Cold packs, electrotherapy modalities, scapular mobilization, stretching, and strengthening exercises were applied to the CT group.
Time frame: through study completion, an average of 6 month
The Numeric Pain Rating Scale was used to evaluate shoulder pain. The patient was asked to mark the point corresponding to the pain between 0 and 10. The higher the score, the higher the pain.
Time frame: through study completion, an average of 6 month
Shoulder flexion, abduction, internal and external rotation were measured using a Universal goniometer.As the angle increases, the joint range of motion increases.
Time frame: through study completion, an average of 6 month
In the patient-specific activity scale, depending on the current pathology, the physiotherapist asks the patient three or five activities that he or she finds difficult to do. The patient is asked to score the activity between 0-10 points. The total score is determined by averaging the activity scores, with higher scores indicating better function.
Ankara Yildirim Beyazıt University
Other
Comparison of Conventional Therapy and Mulligan Mobilization With Movement Method in the Treatment of Shoulder Problems: A Randomized Clinical Trial
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05529680
Arthralgia, Exercise Therapy
Cairo, New Cairo, Egypt
View Trial DetailsNCT04083287
Shoulder Syndrome
Istanbul, Bagcilar, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT04872335
Chronic Pain, Neck Pain
Lahore, Punjab Province, Pakistan
View Trial DetailsNCT04081948
Shoulder Syndrome
Istanbul, Bagcilar, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial Details