MT10109L
DrugMT10109L will be injected into the GL.
Other names: NivobotulinumtoxinA
NCT Number: NCT03795922
To evaluate the safety and efficacy of MT10109L in the treatment of glabellar lines (GL) in participants with moderate to severe GL.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 3
Centre de la Fontaine, Loverval, Hainaut, Belgium
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
MT10109L will be injected into the GL.
Other names: NivobotulinumtoxinA
Placebo will be injected into the GL.
Time frame: Day 30
The primary efficacy measure is a composite endpoint and a participant is considered responder only if both the investigator and participant independently report a ≥ 2-grade improvement at Day 30 of Double-Blind Period from baseline. Both participant and investigator used FWS to assess GL severity. FWS is 4-grade scale (0 to 3): 0=none and 3=severe.
The primary endpoint is achieved and recorded as a count only when BOTH INVESTIGATOR AND PARTICIPANT assess the improvement in FWS from baseline to be ≥ 2-grade improvement. Therefore, the primary endpoint is the proportion/percentage of participants who meet the dual assessment threshold of ≥2-grade improvement from baseline.
Time frame: Day 30
The Percentage of Responders for Investigator Assessments of Glabellar Lines (GL) Severity at Maximum Frown Using the Facial Wrinkle Scale (FWS), where a Responder was defined as Achieving a ≥2-grade Improvement from Baseline at Maximum Frown at Day 30 of double-blind period. The investigator evaluates the participant's GL severity using a 4-point scale (0 to 3) where 0=none and 3=severe
Time frame: Day 1 (first treatment) to Day 180
The investigator evaluates the participant's GL severity using a 4-grade scale (0 to 3) where 0=none and 3 = severe. The outcome is measured as median time to loss of treatment effect (i.e., return to moderate or severe GL severity at maximum frown using the FWS).
Time frame: Day 60
The Satisfaction Question 5 grades facial line treatment satisfaction on a 5-point scale (-2 to 2) where -2=Very dissatisfied and 2=Very satisfied.
Time frame: Day 30
The outcome was measured among participants who Were rated at least mild at rest at baseline, where a Responder was defined as achieving a ≥1-grade improvement from Baseline at Day 30 of double-blind period. The investigator evaluates the participant's GL severity using a 4-point scale (0 to 3) where 0=none and 3=severe.
Time frame: The time frame for AEs is from the first dose on Day 1 and up to 30 days after their last visit or study exit (Day 360 or early exit).
This section focuses primarily on Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), i.e., AEs that started or worsened after the first dose of study intervention (Day 1) until up to 30 days after their last visit or study exit. The safety analyses were conducted in the Safety population. Unless otherwise noted, safety results refer to TEAEs.
Time frame: Baseline to Study exit (Day 360 or early exit)
Change from baseline at study exit.
Time frame: Baseline to Study exit (Day 360 or early exit)
Change from baseline at study exit.
Time frame: Baseline to Study exit (Day 360 or early exit)
Change from baseline at study exit.
Time frame: Baseline to Study exit (Day 360 or early exit)
Change from baseline at study exit.
Time frame: Baseline to Study Exit (Day 360 or early exit)
Change from baseline at study exit.
Time frame: Baseline to Study Exit (Day 360 or early exit)
Change from baseline at study exit.
Time frame: Baseline to Study Exit (Day 360 or early exit)
Change from baseline at study exit.
Time frame: Baseline to Study Exit (Day 360 or early exit)
Change from baseline at study exit.
Time frame: Baseline to Study Exit (Day 360 or early exit)
Change from baseline at study exit.
Time frame: Baseline to Study Exit (Day 360 or early exit)
Change from baseline at study exit.
Time frame: Baseline to Study Exit (Day 360 or early exit)
Change from baseline at study exit.
Time frame: Up to Study Exit (Day 360 or early exit)
Only samples that tested positive in the binding antibody confirmatory assay were evaluated for neutralizing antibodies. The participants with positive neutralizing antibodies are only shown.
Medy-Tox
Industry
A Multicenter, Double-blind, Randomized, Placebo-controlled, Parallel-group Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of MT10109L (NivobotulinumtoxinA) for the Treatment of Glabellar Lines
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06308198
Glabellar Lines
Beijing, Beijing Municipality, China
View Trial DetailsNCT05496335
Glabellar Lines
Newport Beach, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07622004
Glabellar Lines
Seoul, South Korea
View Trial DetailsNCT07398755
Glabellar Lines, Midface Volume Deficiency
Vienna, State of Vienna, Austria
View Trial Details