Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT03819751

MRI-targeted Biopsy of the Prostate: Software Versus Visual Registration in the Accuracy of Prostate Cancer Detection

With the general acceptance of MRI and technical advances in biopsy technique of the prostate, new questions arise concerning the selection of patients, the approach, the appropriate technique, the lesions to target and the number of biopsies. The purpose of this study is to address these issues in men suspicious of having prostate cancer and without prior biopsies.

Recruiting

Interested in participating?

Request Info

Key information

Age range

50 year–75 year

Sex eligibility

Male

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

About this study

Trial Design: This is a prospective, single center, comparative, diagnostic study of two biopsy techniques. All men aged 50 to 75 years with clinical suspicion of PCa (elevated prostate specific antigen (PSA) levels in blood and/or abnormal digital rectal examination) and an MRI with suspicious lesion(s) (presence of PI-RADS 3-5 lesion) will be included. Participants receive both types of biopsy, but will be randomized concerning the order of the biopsy. All men will also receive traditional systematic biopsies. Treatment and further follow-up is according to EAU guidelines. Data of treatment and follow-up will be retrieved till 2 years after initial MRI-visit.

Sample Size: Based on McNemar test for the comparison between the accuracy of the two biopsy techniques, the required sample size is estimated on 96 patients.

Assessment of efficacy: Efficacy of software and visual registration biopsy will be determined by histopathology: cancer core length (actual length and percentage) and comparison with systematic biopsy as reference standard.

Direct access to source data and documents: The investigator(s) and the institution(s) will permit trial-related monitoring, audits, EC review, and regulatory inspections (where appropriate) by providing direct access to source data and other documents (i.e. patients' case sheets, blood test reports, X-ray reports, histology reports, etc.).

Data handling and management: All data collected during the study remain confidential and according to the GDPR regulation. Data of the participants will be retrieved from their electronic patient files. Each participant will be given a unique identification number. When data are coded, there continues to be a link between the data and the individual who provided it. The research team is obligated to protect the data from disclosure outside the research according to the terms of the research protocol and the informed consent document. The subject's name or other identifiers should be stored separately (site file) from their research data and replaced with a unique code to create a new identity for the subject. Note that coded data are not anonymous. All data is collected and stored electronically by the principal investigator and co-investigators.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • willing to participate in the study by giving written informed consent.
  • male subjects aged between 50 to 75 years.
  • with a clinical suspicion of PCa: elevated prostate specific antigen (PSA) levels in blood and/or abnormal digital rectal examination (DRE).
  • good health condition based on medical history, physical examination and vital sign measurements.
  • with target lesion on dedicated MRI of the prostate (PI-RADS 3 to 5).

Exclusion criteria

  • has a prior history of prostate cancer.
  • had prior prostate biopsy.
  • has a contra-indication for MRI (claustrophobia, non-compatible metallic implants).
  • has evidence of lymph nodes involvement on prostate MRI or abdominal CT
  • has evidence of bone metastasis on bone scan.
  • has a prior history of hip prosthesis, pelvic radiation therapy or androgen deprivation therapy
  • unable to perform transrectal ultrasound due to prior rectal surgery or active rectal diseases (rectitis, …)
  • has any condition, physical, mental, familial or sociological, that could impede compliance with the study protocol and further follow-up. This is not an absolute contra-indication, but should be discussed with patient prior to registration in the trial.

Treatment and study plan

MRI-targeted prostate biopsy

Procedure

All participants receive traditional cognitive/visual registration biopsy and the above mentioned MRI/TRUS fusion biopsy (also known as software registration biopsy)

Other names: MRI/TRUS fusion biopsy with Philips Percunav

Primary outcomes

  1. Accuracy of the two MR-guided registration techniques (visual and software-based) in the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer

    Time frame: From MRI-visit till results of radical prostatectomy is known or till up to 2 years after MRI-visit

    Assessment of the detection rate of clinically significant prostate cancer of software registration biopsy and visual registration biopsy, using traditional TRUS-guided systematic biopsy, whole mount radical prostatectomy specimen and follow-up as reference.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Analysis of the performance of software versus visual registration biopsy in subgroups

    Time frame: From MRI-visit till results of radical prostatectomy is known or till up to 2 years after MRI-visit

    Assessment of the performance of software registration biopsy and visual registration biopsy in the detection of clinically significant cancer in :

    • lesions in small volume prostates (<50 gram) versus large volume prostates (>50 gram).
    • transitional zone versus peripheral zone lesions
    • basal versus apical lesions
    • small (max. diameter < or = 10 mm) versus large lesions (max. diameter > 10 mm)
    • intermediate suspicious lesions (PI-RADS 3) versus highly suspicious lesions (PI-RADS 4-5).
  2. Added value of systematic biopsies

    Time frame: From MRI-visit till results of radical prostatectomy is known or till up to 2 years after MRI-visit

    Assessment of the added value of systematic biopsies on top of MRI-targeted biopsy of PI-RADS 3, 4 and 5 lesions. Compare MRI-targeted + systematic biopsies versus MRI-targeted biopsies alone in T-staging and therapy options.

  3. Discriminative features of PI-RADS 3 lesions on MRI

    Time frame: From MRI-visit till results of radical prostatectomy is known or till up to 2 years after MRI-visit

    Lesion diameters, shape, intensity on T2 and aspect, ADC-values on ADC-map will be measured to identify possible discriminative features of 'malignant' s "benigne" PI-RADS 3 lesions.

  4. Features of prostate cancer differentiation grade on MRI

    Time frame: From MRI-visit till results of radical prostatectomy is known or till up to 2 years after MRI-visit

    Measure ADC-value to differentiate prostate cancer differentiation grade.

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Cindy Mai, MD

CONTACT

[email protected]

016345032 ext. 016345032

Frederik De Keyzer

CONTACT

[email protected]

016347755 ext. 016345032

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU Leuven

Other

Registry information

Official study title

MRI-targeted Biopsy of the Prostate: a Prospective Comparison of Software-based Fusion Versus Visual (Cognitive) Registration in the Accuracy of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer Detection

Acronym: PROSOVI

Important dates

Study start
2019
Primary completion
2025
Study completion
2025
First posted
Jan 28, 2019
Registry last updated
Jul 3, 2024

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.