Zurich University Hospital
Zurich, 8091, Switzerland
NCT Number: NCT03972072
Radiotherapy is the main treatment for locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN). Many advances regarding tumor control and patient survival have been made over the past decades. However, treatment-induced toxicity remains a crucial problem, leading to reduced quality of life and permanent impairment for many survivors. Xerostomia is up to this day the leading cause of late toxicity for these patients. Toxicity has been reduced by implementation of modern image guided radiotherapy (IGRT) and intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT), but the low soft-tissue contrast of routine x-ray image guidance does not allow exact planning adaptation and daily imaging is associated with high radiation exposure. Furthermore, despite the routinely use of IMRT, rates of clinically relevant xerostomia (i.e. grade 2 or worse) are still common and reported in approximately 38%. Recently developed hybrid machines (MRidian®-CE approval since 2016), consisting of a linear accelerator and an integrated low-field MRI, could allow a) better visualization of tumor and organs at risk, such as parotid glands during patient positioning and daily treatment, b) daily imaging without additional radiation exposure, c) narrowest established safety margins for the treatment volumes, and finally d) repetitive adaptation of target volumes according to changes in patient weight and tumor anatomy during the radiotherapy course. These procedures would facilitate a high-precision treatment and help reduce dose exposure of critical structures.
This study is active but is not currently recruiting participants.
18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Zurich, 8091, Switzerland
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
daily MR-imaging/MR guided radiotherapy once weekly offline plan adaptation to a total of 6
baseline, 6 month-, 12 month- and 24 month-follow up salivary flow measurements and LENT-SOMA subjective/objective evaluation of xerostomia
Time frame: 12 month-follow up
will be evaluated by the LENT-SOMA (Late Effects Normal Tissue Task Force (LENT)-Subjective, Objective, Management, Analytic (SOMA)) side-effect scale: SOM (1)-(4) (higher score represents higher grade xerostomia), A: objective flow measurement (1) 76-95%, (2) 51-75%, (3) 26-50%, (4) 0-25%
Time frame: 6- and 24-months follow up
will be evaluated by the LENT-SOMA (Late Effects Normal Tissue Task Force (LENT)-Subjective, Objective, Management, Analytic (SOMA)) side-effect scale: SOM (1)-(4) (higher score represents higher grade xerostomia), A: objective flow measurement (1) 76-95%, (2) 51-75%, (3) 26-50%, (4) 0-25%
Time frame: 2-years
as defined from treatment start to histologically confirmed tumor progression, persistence or last follow up
Time frame: 2-years
as defined from treatment start to death from any cause or last follow up
Time frame: 6 months after treatment
Questionnaire consists of 30 questions with a maximal score of 100. Absolute scores after linear transformation will be reported as descriptive statistics The QLQ-C30 is composed of both multi-item scales and single-item measures. These include five functional scales, three symptom scales, a global health status / QoL scale, and six single items. Each of the multi-item scales includes a different set of items - no item occurs in more than one scale. All of the scales and single-item measures range in score from 0 to 100. A high scale score represents a higher response level.
A high score for a functional scale represents a high / healthy level of functioning, a high score for the global health status / QoL represents a high QoL, but a high score for a symptom scale / item represents a high level of symptomatology / problems.
See also: https://www.eortc.org/app/uploads/sites/2/2018/02/SCmanual.pdf
Time frame: 6 months after treatment
total scoring of an additional 35 questions with a similar approach to that of the core questionnaire will be reported as descriptive statistics
Time frame: 12 months after treatment
Questionnaire consists of 30 questions with a maximal score of 100. Absolute scores after linear transformation will be reported as descriptive statistics The QLQ-C30 is composed of both multi-item scales and single-item measures. These include five functional scales, three symptom scales, a global health status / QoL scale, and six single items. Each of the multi-item scales includes a different set of items - no item occurs in more than one scale. All of the scales and single-item measures range in score from 0 to 100. A high scale score represents a higher response level.
A high score for a functional scale represents a high / healthy level of functioning, a high score for the global health status / QoL represents a high QoL, but a high score for a symptom scale / item represents a high level of symptomatology / problems.
See also: https://www.eortc.org/app/uploads/sites/2/2018/02/SCmanual.pdf
Time frame: 12 months after treatment
total scoring of an additional 35 questions with a similar approach to that of the core questionnaire will be reported as descriptive statistics
Time frame: 24 months after treatment
Questionnaire consists of 30 questions with a maximal score of 100. Absolute scores after linear transformation will be reported as descriptive statistics The QLQ-C30 is composed of both multi-item scales and single-item measures. These include five functional scales, three symptom scales, a global health status / QoL scale, and six single items. Each of the multi-item scales includes a different set of items - no item occurs in more than one scale. All of the scales and single-item measures range in score from 0 to 100. A high scale score represents a higher response level.
A high score for a functional scale represents a high / healthy level of functioning, a high score for the global health status / QoL represents a high QoL, but a high score for a symptom scale / item represents a high level of symptomatology / problems.
See also: https://www.eortc.org/app/uploads/sites/2/2018/02/SCmanual.pdf
Time frame: 24 months after treatment
total scoring of an additional 35 questions with a similar approach to that of the core questionnaire will be reported as descriptive statistics
Time frame: weekly during radiotherapy and at 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21 and 24 months
evaluated by the CTCAE v5-questionnaires
Time frame: Up to 9 weeks after enrollment: Images acquired at baseline (i.e. up to 10 days before first radiotherapy fraction, used for radiotherapy planning) and daily radiotherapy treatment (treatment days 1-35, 7 weeks)
as assessed by serial T1/T2 images acquired with the hybrid 0.35 T MR-linac and correlated with xerostomia at 12 months
Time frame: Up to 9 weeks after enrollment: Images acquired at baseline (i.e. up to 10 days before first radiotherapy fraction, used for radiotherapy planning) and daily radiotherapy treatment (treatment days 1-35, 7 weeks)
as assessed by serial T1/T2 images acquired with the hybrid 0.35 T MR-linac and correlated with tumor control at 24 months
Time frame: Up to 3 months after enrollment (value assessment at baseline, after one week of treatment, last week of treatment and first follow up)
Prognostic value of inflammation surrogates (neutrophile count, CRP/ albumin ratio) in the peripheral blood
Time frame: Up to 3 months after enrollment (value assessment at baseline, after one week of treatment and first follow up)
Prognostic value of different circulating (at different time-points) immune cells as defined by longitudinal FACS-analysis of immune phenotype in the peripheral blood
Panagiotis Balermpas
Other
MARTHA-trial: MRI - Guided Adaptive RadioTHerapy for Reducing XerostomiA in Head and Neck Cancer Including Longitudinal Evaluation of the Patient's Immune Profile Under Radiotherapy
Acronym: MARTHA
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT03418792
Head and Neck Cancer, Head and Neck Neoplasms
Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT04043104
Head and Neck Cancer, Head and Neck Neoplasms
Stanford, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT03247712
Carcinoma, Carcinoma, Squamous Cell
Portland, Oregon, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05820711
Head and Neck Cancer, Head and Neck Neoplasms
Madison, Wisconsin, United States
View Trial Details