Bone Metastases Pain treatment
ProcedureComparative treatments to test if MRgFUS is an effective non-invasive and safe treatment for the palliation of metastatic bone tumors with a low incidence of co-morbidity as compared to EBRT (gold-standard)
NCT Number: NCT03404362
The objective of this trial is to collect and compare safety and effectiveness data of Magnetic Resonance guided Focused Ultrasound (MRgFUS) using the ExAblate 2100 device and radiotherapy in the treatment of metastatic bone tumors.
This study is designed as a prospective, double arm, non-randomized study with External Beam radiation therapy (EBRT) serving as control arm.
The study hypothesis is that MRgFUS is an effective non-invasive and safe treatment for the palliation of metastatic bone tumors with a low incidence of co-morbidity as compared to EBRT.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Alessandro Napoli, Rome, Italy
This is a prospective, phase II, open-label, non-randomized, double arm study to collect data on safety and effectiveness of ExAblate MRgFUS and EBRT treatments of metastatic bone tumors. Following treatment assignment and treatment itself, subjects will be followed for up for 12 months to evaluate pain relief as well as quality of life. Additional data regarding dosage and frequency of analgesic consumption for the management of the bone tumor induced pain will also be collected. MRI of the treated lesion will be obtained 3 and 6 months post therapy to evaluate effect on the lesion in both radiation and MRgFUS arms. This is clinically acceptable and widely utilized diagnostic method in follow up of this patient population.
Data will be collected for a total of 184 patients, 92 patients treated by EBRT and another 92 patients treated by FUS.
Treating physician, as of his/her normal practice, might offer additional treatment of other type in cases where pain score of the treated lesion will not improve by at least 2 points, and will remain 4 or greater. Additional treatment may be performed up to one month following treatment. Prior to offering alternative treatment, an MRI will be performed to evaluate effect on the lesion. Patient receiving another treatment, different from the initial one (i.e. patient initially treated with FUS is now treated by EBRT) will be considered as treatment failures for the primary analysis and their post-x-over follow-up results will be analyzed separately.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Comparative treatments to test if MRgFUS is an effective non-invasive and safe treatment for the palliation of metastatic bone tumors with a low incidence of co-morbidity as compared to EBRT (gold-standard)
Time frame: one month
The key points that this study will capture are as follows:
Capture patient-based pain assessment using a NRS pain scale of 0-10 with anchored points in conjunction with a body diagram, capturing worst and average pain score.
Response rates were defined as follows:
Time frame: 12 months
Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) will be used to capture patient estimates of their global rating of change in pain at the treatment site to anchor change scores on a given instrument. Clinically significant responses were defined as a reduction ≥ 2 from baseline
Time frame: 12 months
QLQ-C15-PAL will be used to capture patient estimates of their global rating of change in pain at the treatment site to anchor change scores on a given instrument. Clinically significant responses were defined as a reduction ≥5 points from baseline
Time frame: 12 months
QLQ-C15-PAL will be used to capture patient estimates of their global rating of change in pain at the treatment site to anchor change scores on a given instrument. Clinically significant responses were defined as a reduction ≥8 points from baseline
Time frame: 12 months
Safety of both treatments will be determined by an evaluation of the incidence and severity of device and procedure related complications from the first / treatment day visit through the 12-Months post-treatment time point. Adverse events were categorized according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.03
University of Roma La Sapienza
Other
A Two-center Phase II, Non-randomized Study of MRgFUS Versus EBRT in Patients With Metastatic Non-spinal Bone Disease: Palliative Strategy for Cancer-Induced Bone Pain
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT04157166
Bone Metastases
Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France
View Trial DetailsNCT02810262
Bone Metastases, Lung Cancer
Lyon, France
View Trial DetailsNCT00699751
Bone Metastases, Hormone Refractory Prostate Cancer
Los Angeles, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06376682
Bone Diseases, Bone Metastases
Lyon, France
View Trial Details