mandibular repositioning appliance (MRA) (SomnoDent)
Devicebibloc MRA type SomnoDent starting at 70% protrusion of the mandibula
Other names: bibloc SomnoDent
NCT Number: NCT01588275
The purpose of this study is to compare the cost-effectiveness and effectiveness of mandibular repositioning appliance (MRA) versus Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) therapy in patients with moderate Obstructive Sleep Apnea Syndrome (OSAS).
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Medisch Centrum Leeuwarden, Leeuwarden, Provincie Friesland, Netherlands
Study design: In a randomized parallel controlled study 86 patients will be randomly assigned to either MRA therapy or CPAP therapy. Group A receives MRA. Group B receives CPAP. The total duration of the study is 12 months. Measurements will be done at baseline, after 3, 6 and 12 months.
Intervention: Group A will be treated with a bibloc MRA (Somnodent). The mandible will be set at 70% of the patient's maximum advancement and will be adjusted to the convenience of the patient. Titration will be continued until symptoms abate or until further advancement causes discomfort.
Group B will be treated with CPAP. Proper CPAP-pressure will be set for each patient separately. Patients are fitted with a comfortable CPAP mask before titration of the CPAP-pressure. For CPAP-titration, patients are instructed to adopt their own typical sleeping habits.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Medical and psychological criteria:
Whether the patient has unstable endocrine dysfunction, severe cardiovascular- or pulmonary co-morbidity or a psychological condition precluding informed consent, will be assessed by evaluating the patient's medical record.
Dental exclusion criteria:
bibloc MRA type SomnoDent starting at 70% protrusion of the mandibula
Other names: bibloc SomnoDent
Proper CPAP-pressure will be set for each patient separately.
Time frame: 12 months
Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) in terms of AHI reduction measured during polysomnography and quality adjusted life years (QALYs)
Time frame: 3, 6 and 12 months
EQ5D, SF-36, FOSQ questionnaires at baseline and after 3, 6 and 12 months
Time frame: 6 and 12 months
smoking status, change from baseline ambulant blood pressure measurements after 12 months, blood samples, urine sample, accumulation of advanced glycation endproducts (AGEs) in skin tissue
Time frame: 3 and 12 months
total sleep time, sleep efficiency, minimal oxyhemoglobin saturation, arousals, sleep stages
Time frame: 3 and 12 months
Total distance on 6 minutes walking test Number of steps measured with pedometer
Time frame: 3, 6 and 12 months
objective compliance by reading out devices subjective compliance by questionnaire
Time frame: 3, 6 and 12 months
self-reported side effects from device dental and maxillofacial side-effects from both MRA and CPAP
University Medical Center Groningen
Other
Cost-effectiveness of obstRuctivE Sleep Apnea Therapy (REST Study): Comparison of MRA Therapy Versus CPAP Therapy in Moderate OSAS
Acronym: REST
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT00642486
Apnea, Behavior
Cleveland, Ohio, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT02809430
Apnea, Behavior
Seattle, Washington, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT03280914
Apnea, Behavior
Guangzhou, China
View Trial DetailsNCT00232544
Apnea, Behavior
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
View Trial Details