Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT01588275

MRA Therapy Versus CPAP Therapy in Moderate OSAS

The purpose of this study is to compare the cost-effectiveness and effectiveness of mandibular repositioning appliance (MRA) versus Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) therapy in patients with moderate Obstructive Sleep Apnea Syndrome (OSAS).

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Medisch Centrum Leeuwarden, Leeuwarden, Provincie Friesland, Netherlands

Loading trial locations.

About this study

Study design: In a randomized parallel controlled study 86 patients will be randomly assigned to either MRA therapy or CPAP therapy. Group A receives MRA. Group B receives CPAP. The total duration of the study is 12 months. Measurements will be done at baseline, after 3, 6 and 12 months.

Intervention: Group A will be treated with a bibloc MRA (Somnodent). The mandible will be set at 70% of the patient's maximum advancement and will be adjusted to the convenience of the patient. Titration will be continued until symptoms abate or until further advancement causes discomfort.

Group B will be treated with CPAP. Proper CPAP-pressure will be set for each patient separately. Patients are fitted with a comfortable CPAP mask before titration of the CPAP-pressure. For CPAP-titration, patients are instructed to adopt their own typical sleeping habits.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Individuals who have been subjected to polysomnography and are diagnosed as having moderate (AHI 15-30) OSAS;
  • Aged ≥ 18 years;

Exclusion criteria

Medical and psychological criteria:

  • Patients previously treated for OSAS (e.g. CPAP, MRA);
  • Morphologic abnormalities of the upper airway (e.g., a compromised nasal passage, enlarged tonsils or adenoids, or upper airway soft-tissue or craniofacial abnormality);
  • Reported or documented unstable endocrine dysfunction (hypothyroidism, acromegaly, or pituitary adenoma); Reported or documented severe cardiovascular- or pulmonary co-morbidity
  • Clinically concurrent cardiovascular disease (coronary artery disease, heart failure,cardiac arrhythmias)
  • CVA within 6 months prior to randomisation
  • Daytime respiratory insufficiency
  • Severe Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) (GOLD 3 or 4; FEV1 / FVC < 70% and FEV1 < 50%);
  • Other diseases that may impact the evaluation of the results of the study according to the investigator's judgement.
  • Reported or documented psychological condition precluding informed consent (e.g., mental retardation, depression or schizophrenia);

Whether the patient has unstable endocrine dysfunction, severe cardiovascular- or pulmonary co-morbidity or a psychological condition precluding informed consent, will be assessed by evaluating the patient's medical record.

Dental exclusion criteria:

  • Extensive periodontal disease or tooth decay;
  • Active temporomandibular joint disease (including severe bruxism);
  • Restrictions in mouth opening (< 25mm) or advancement of the mandible <5mm);
  • Partial or complete edentulism (less than eight teeth in upper or lower jaw).

Treatment and study plan

mandibular repositioning appliance (MRA) (SomnoDent)

Device

bibloc MRA type SomnoDent starting at 70% protrusion of the mandibula

Other names: bibloc SomnoDent

Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP)

Procedure

Proper CPAP-pressure will be set for each patient separately.

Primary outcomes

  1. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) in terms of AHI reduction and quality adjusted life years

    Time frame: 12 months

    Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) in terms of AHI reduction measured during polysomnography and quality adjusted life years (QALYs)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in quality of life

    Time frame: 3, 6 and 12 months

    EQ5D, SF-36, FOSQ questionnaires at baseline and after 3, 6 and 12 months

  2. Change in Cardiovascular risk

    Time frame: 6 and 12 months

    smoking status, change from baseline ambulant blood pressure measurements after 12 months, blood samples, urine sample, accumulation of advanced glycation endproducts (AGEs) in skin tissue

  3. Change in polysomnographic outcomes

    Time frame: 3 and 12 months

    total sleep time, sleep efficiency, minimal oxyhemoglobin saturation, arousals, sleep stages

  4. Change in activities of daily living

    Time frame: 3 and 12 months

    Total distance on 6 minutes walking test Number of steps measured with pedometer

  5. Compliance

    Time frame: 3, 6 and 12 months

    objective compliance by reading out devices subjective compliance by questionnaire

  6. Side effects

    Time frame: 3, 6 and 12 months

    self-reported side effects from device dental and maxillofacial side-effects from both MRA and CPAP

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

University Medical Center Groningen

Other

Collaborators

  • SomnoMed Goedegebuure
  • VitalAire Nederland BV

Registry information

Official study title

Cost-effectiveness of obstRuctivE Sleep Apnea Therapy (REST Study): Comparison of MRA Therapy Versus CPAP Therapy in Moderate OSAS

Acronym: REST

Important dates

Study start
2012
Primary completion
2017
Study completion
2017
First posted
Apr 30, 2012
Registry last updated
May 15, 2018

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.