MR Elastography in Intracranial Lesions: Feasibility & Accuracy

Despite their relatively low incidence among all cancers, brain tumors are associated with substantial morbidity and mortality, attributed to the brain's intricate structure and critical physiological roles. Pathologically categorized into metastases to the CNS; meningiomas; gliomas, glioneuronal tumors, and neuronal tumors; tumors of the sellar region; cranial and paraspinal nerve tumors; hematolymphoid tumors; mesenchymal, non-meningothelial tumors; embryonal tumors; germ cell tumors; and choroid plexus tumors, these neoplasms undergo a complex, multi-stage evolution-encompassing initial cellular alterations, tumorigenesis, progression, and potential metastasis. Their oncogenesis is intricately linked to dysregulated cell differentiation during embryonic development, where lower differentiation grades typically correlate with higher malignancy. Clinically, brain tumors manifest as elevated intracranial pressure, neurological and cognitive deficits, and epileptic seizures.

The curability of brain tumors depends on tumor type, grading, and therapeutic strategies. While benign tumors often achieve complete remission through surgical resection, malignant tumors require sophisticated multimodal therapies. Although biopsy serves as the gold standard for tumor grading, its invasive nature, high cost, potential complications, poor patient tolerance, and susceptibility to sampling bias and interpretive subjectivity limit its applicability for frequent monitoring. In this context, non-invasive imaging modalities-such as magnetic resonance elastography (MRE)-capable of longitudinal assessment of lesioned brain tissue, provide invaluable clinical insights, guiding emerging therapeutic interventions aimed at decelerating or halting progression to terminal brain tumors.

Conventional magnetic resonance (MR) imaging effectively visualizes tumors via morphological changes; however, these traditional techniques demonstrate limited sensitivity to differentiating tumor grades. Emerging evidence highlights MRE's potential in tumor grading and diagnosis. Despite the increasing clinical adoption of brain MRE, its widespread implementation remains restricted. Therefore, rigorous quality control of MRE acquisitions is essential to ensure result reproducibility and reliability, while identifying root causes of suboptimal outcomes.

This retrospective study analyzed MRE findings from 626 patients with brain tumors between May 2017 and September 2025. By evaluating MRE's diagnostic efficacy, success rate in tumor grading, and clinical reliability, the research addresses critical gaps in non-invasive brain tumor assessment, contributing to the advancement of evidence-based neuro-oncological imaging practices.

Inclusion criteria

• Tumor diameter > 2 cm
• MR elastography performed within one week before surgery

Patients were excluded if they had:

• incomplete MRI or MRE data
• A history of brain trauma, brain tumors, or surgery
• Received chemotherapy, radiotherapy, or hormone therapy for any reason before surgery
• Tumors that could not be assigned grades according to the fifth edition of the WHO Classification of CNS (WHO CNS5)
• MRE examinations with suboptimal wave image quality (e.g., motion artifacts or inadequate wave amplitude)