Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Not Yet Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT07493733

MPTA on Full Standing and Rosenberg Views in Patients Undergoing High Tibial Osteotomy

-Comparison of MPTA on both Full-leg Standing and Rosenberg Radiographs .

Not Yet Recruiting

Trial opening soon.

Get Notified

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Observational

About this study

The medial open wedge high tibial osteotomy (MOW-HTO) is awidely and successfully performed treatment for medial compartment osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee joint .

The primary goal of MOW-HTO is to alleviate mechanical stress onthe medial compartment of the knee joint by shifting the weight-bearing line (WBL) toward the lateral compartment .

Correct alignment is essential for achieving long-term success and favorable outcomes, making accurate preoperative planning crucial.

Accepted gold standard for preoperative coronal plane assessment of lower limb alignment are full-leg standing radiographs (FLSR) .

Measurement variables in the coronal plane include the mechanical lateral proximal femoral angle (mLPFA), mechanical lateral distal femoral angle (mLDFA), mechanical medial proximal tibial angle and mechanical lateral distal tibial angle.

However, alignment measurements are influenced by factors such as knee flexion, rotation, and loading conditions .

Identifying these factors prior to surgery is crucial to minimizing the risk of surgical error.

Posteroanterior weight-bearing radiographs taken with the knee in 45 degrees of flexion, commonly referred to as the Rosenberg view (RB), are routinely used preoperatively . This imaging technique not only facilitates the assessment of the severity of knee OA but also aids in evaluating the degree of soft tissue laxity contributing to varus alignment-a factor increasingly recognized for its clinical significance .

For knowledge, one study has investigated how knee alignment parameters used for planning of HTO differ when measured using the RB .

The invistegator hypothesize that the medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA) does not differ when measured on RB radiographs compared with FLSR. Being a widely accessible and commonly used imaging technique, if confirmed, this finding would suggest that the RB could serve as a com-plementary modality for preoperative planning for MOW-HTO.

Who can participate

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • All patients were screened for medial compartment OA of either the left or right knee joint.
  • Availability of preoperative full-length standing radiograph and Rosenberg view.
  • Completeness of patient records .
  • Patient consent

Exclusion criteria

  • Insufficient patient records .
  • Previous ligamentous surgery or osteotomies .
  • Known neuromuscular or metabolic disorder .
  • Absence of a radiographic reference ball.

Treatment and study plan

x-ray

Device

comparing of MPTA on full standing and rosenberg views

Primary outcomes

  1. Difference in medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA) measurments in both the Rosenberg view and full-leg standing radiographic position

    Time frame: Baseline

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Ahmed Gadelkarem Farrag, Resident Doctor

CONTACT

[email protected]

+20 01009372187

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Assiut University

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Comparing Medial Proximal Tibial Angle Measurements on Full-leg Standing Radiographs and The Rosenberg View in Patients Undergoing High Tibial Osteotomy

Important dates

Study start
2026
Primary completion
2028
Study completion
2028
First posted
Mar 25, 2026
Registry last updated
Mar 25, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.