University of Minnesota
Minneapolis, Minnesota, 55455, United States
NCT Number: NCT01575366
Aim 1. Determine whether higher-velocity finger tracking training improves hand function more than slower velocity training. Working hypotheses: The higher-velocity training will have significantly greater functional improvement compared to the lower-velocity training, as measured by standardized upper extremity functional tests (Jebsen Taylor test, Box & Block Test, and Finger extension force test)
Aim 2. Ascertain whether higher-velocity finger tracking training differentially induces cortical reorganization as compared to lower-velocity finger tracking training.
Working hypotheses: The higher-velocity training will have significantly greater cortical reorganization compared to the lower-velocity training, as measured by:
1. TMS - increased amplitude of motor evoked potentials (MEP) from paretic extensor digitorum muscle in response to paired-pulse TMS to ipsilesional primary motor area (M1). 2. fMRI - increased volume of activation, signal intensity, and laterality of ipsilesional M1.
Aim 3. Explore whether the functional improvements correlate with the cortical reorganization. Working hypotheses: The functional improvements will correlate with the cortical reorganization.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 1
Minneapolis, Minnesota, 55455, United States
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
include:
Exclusion criteria
include:
The paretic finger movement training at different velocities included two 5-week periods of five days per week, 2-hours per day phases. The frequency for the higher-velocity training is 0.8 Hz, whereas the lower frequency training is 4 times slower, at 0.2 Hz. The two periods are each followed by a 3-week baseline period. The subject is seated in front of a laptop computer with the paretic forearm resting on the arm of the chair in a quiet room at home. The position of the forearm is pronated. An electrogoniometer, composed of a potentiometer attached to a custom hand splint, is placed on the paretic index finger with the potentiometer centered at the metacarpophalangeal joint. To keep the training session time equal between the two training phases, the duration of each slow training trial is 5 sec, compared to 20 sec for each fast training trial. Ultimately, the total number of required finger extension/flexion training movements is equal between the two phases.
Time frame: taken at weekly intervals for the whole study length, 20 weeks.
Jebsen Taylor test, Box & Block Test, and Finger extension force test
Time frame: taken at weekly intervals for the whole study length, 20 weeks.
TMS
Time frame: at the beginning and at the end of the study, which are 1st and 20th week.
University of Minnesota
Other
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT02425345
Arterial Occlusive Diseases, Arteriosclerosis
View Trial DetailsNCT05589402
Bone Diseases, Brain Diseases
Harlingen, Texas, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06750692
Brain Diseases, Cardiovascular Diseases
Afyonkarahisar, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT04992195
Alzheimer Disease, Arterial Thromboembolism
Hong Kong
View Trial Details