Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT02255643

Motor Threshold and Motor Cortex Stimulation

Motor cortex stimulation (MCS) is a form of brain stimulation for patients with neuropathic pain not responsive to medication. An electrode is placed on the surface of the brain and connected to a programmable battery in the chest.

The strength of stimulation can be individually adjusted by changing the voltage of stimulation. A too high voltage will produce side effects (e.g. seizures) while a too low voltage will not provide pain control. The aim of this study is to analyze the optimal stimulation parameters in patients already implanted with a motor cortex stimulation who have received good pain relief. The actual voltage may vary widely between patients but the investigators feel that there may be an "ideal" voltage if it is measured as a percentage of motor threshold (PMT). If motor threshold is the stimulation voltage that can evoke a muscle contraction then a PMT = 80% would be a voltage that was eighty percent of that value. Although the actual voltage may be widely different between patients, the percentage needed may be very similar. The investigators therefore plan to measure the effect of different percentages of PMT in patients already being treated with motor cortex stimulation.

Systematic analysis of the findings of this study might help the individual participant and future patients to better programming and less side effects.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Vancouver General Hospital

Vancouver, British Columbia, V5Z 4E3, Canada

About this study

Motor cortex stimulation (MCS) is a form of brain stimulation for patients with medically refractory neuropathic pain. The strength of stimulation can be individually adjusted by changing the voltage of stimulation. Too high voltage will produce side effects (e.g. seizures) while too low voltage will not provide pain control. The aim of this study is to analyze the optimal stimulation parameters in patients already implanted with a motor cortex stimulation who have received good pain relief. The actual voltage may vary widely between patients (because of the individual variations in tissue resistance) but the investigators feel that there may be an "ideal" voltage if it is measured as a percentage of motor threshold (PMT).

If motor threshold is the voltage that can evoke a muscle contraction then a PMT = 80% would be a voltage that was eighty percent of that value. Although the actual voltage may be different between patients, the effective PMT may be similar since it represents a more physiologic measure of stimulation.

Systematic analysis of the findings of this study might help the individual participant and future patients by reducing voltage to the lowest effective setting and reducing the chance of seizures.

Motor cortex stimulation is used in the treatment of neuropathic pain since 1991 but still no guidelines for programming exist and programming is therefore mainly bases on trial and error. This is mostly due to many variables influencing the choice of stimulation parameters and significant individual differences in susceptibility to stimulation. Routinely the motor threshold is determined during programming to identify the superior limit of voltage at which twitching is induced. No stimulation above the motor threshold should be performed as this is known to cause seizures. The voltage of simulation that will be effective for an individual is unknown at the beginning of the treatment.

The investigators try to find the lowest effective voltage because that will reduce the risk of stimulation-induced seizures and prolong the life of the pacemaker.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Adult patient more than 18 years of age
  • Chronic neuropathic pain effectively treated with motor cortex stimulation
  • Stable medication during the trial
  • Willing and able to comply with the study protocol and to return per the follow-up visit schedule and able to provide informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

  • Evidence of an active disruptive psychiatric disorder or other known condition significant enough to impact the perception of pain, compliance to intervention and/or ability to evaluate treatment outcome as determined by the investigator
  • Technical malfunction of the MCS device
  • History of seizures
  • Unable to provide informed consent

Treatment and study plan

Change of PMT setting

Device

The patients current motor threshold is determined and the patient is set to a new PMT (= new treatment arm)

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in Pain measured on the Visual Analogue Scale with different PMT Settings

    Time frame: at the End of each trial period, typically 14 days after changes in PMT Settings

Secondary outcomes

  1. Quality of Life assessment with the SF-36 questionnaire

    Time frame: at the end of each trial period, typically at 14 days

Other outcomes

  1. Pain assessment with the McGill pain questionnaire to record impact of pain

    Time frame: at the end of each trial period, typically 14 days

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

University of British Columbia

Other

Registry information

Official study title

The Relationship Between Motor Threshold and Effective Stimulation Threshold During Motor Cortex Stimulation

Important dates

Study start
2014
Primary completion
2014
Study completion
2014
First posted
Oct 2, 2014
Registry last updated
Dec 18, 2014

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.