Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT02860403

Motor Imagery for Reach-to-grasp Rehabilitation After Tetraplegia

Single center, pilot study, to evaluate the influence of Motor Imagery (MI) on functional rehabilitation and cerebral plasticity through the qualitative and quantitative mental practice approach. For this, the investigators will use magnetoencephalography (MEG) but also physiological and behavioral indicators developed by the Laboratoire de la Performance Motrice, Mentale et du Matériel (P3M) of Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1 and its partners.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year–55 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Hôpital Henry Gabrielle - Médecine physique et Réadaptation, Hospices Civils de Lyon, 20 Route de Vourles,

Saint-Genis-Laval, 69230, France

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • 18-55 years old,
  • quadriplegia elicited by spinal cord injury (SCI) at the C5, C5-C6, C6, or C6-C7 level,
  • complete infra-lesional motor deficit according to the ASIA impairment scale with finger and forearm flexor muscles paralysis,
  • post-traumatic period >6 months (since a motor recovery plateau is usually reached at 6-month post-SCI

Exclusion criteria

  • non-stabilized hypertension or pathological autonomic nervous system dysfunction (e.g., orthostatic hypotension),
  • cerebral damage and/or cognitive deficit,
  • elbow or shoulder joint amplitude restriction, upper limb para-osteoarthropathy,
  • participation to another study
  • presence of metallic objects within the body incompatible with MEG or functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) recordings.

Treatment and study plan

motor imagery

Procedure

Intervention consisted of supervised MI during which the participants were trained to imagine performing a single-joint wrist extension movement and a multiple-joint reach-to-grasp movement using tenodesis. The two movements were practiced in separate blocks and each 45 minute MI session consisted of six to eight blocks. Within a given block patients; i) performed the movement once, ii) imagined it using visual imagery (between five and ten repetitions), iii) performed the movement again, and iv) imagined it using kinesthetic imagery (between five and ten repetitions). All movements (performed and imagined) were timed by the experimenter to ensure that the durations of both imagined and physically practiced movements were similar. Imagery vividness was controlled with self-rated assessments using a visual analogic scale (from 0, the image or feeling was absent, to 10 when it was as clear or intense as physical practice).

Primary outcomes

  1. Motor imagery ability

    Time frame: 10 weeks

    Motor imagery ability assessed by magnetoencephalography measurements

Secondary outcomes

  1. Movement time (MT)

    Time frame: 10 weeks

    Kinematic parameters of movement: temporal parameters: movement time (MT)

  2. absolute time to peak velocity

    Time frame: 10 weeks

    Kinematic parameters of movement: temporal parameters: absolute time to peak velocity

  3. movement amplitude at peak velocity

    Time frame: 10 weeks

    Kinematic parameters of movement: temporal parameters: movement amplitude at peak velocity

  4. time to opening

    Time frame: 10 weeks

    Kinematic parameters of movement: temporal parameters: time to opening

  5. time to maximal opening

    Time frame: 10 weeks

    Kinematic parameters of movement: temporal parameters: time to maximal opening

  6. amplitude of maximal opening

    Time frame: 10 weeks

    Kinematic parameters of movement: temporal parameters: amplitude of maximal opening

  7. Trajectory of movement measured in the XY plane

    Time frame: 10 weeks

    Kinematic parameters of movement: spatial parameters: Trajectory of movement measured in the XY plane

  8. height of elbow and wrist at the moment of grasping an object, measured in mm in the YZ plane

    Time frame: 10 weeks

    Kinematic parameters of movement: spatial parameters: height of elbow and wrist at the moment of grasping an object, measured in mm in the YZ plane

  9. muscular force evaluated by muscle testing performed by a physiotherapist

    Time frame: 10 weeks

    muscular force evaluated by muscle testing performed by a physiotherapist (score from 0 to 5)

  10. joint amplitude evaluated in degrees (°) by the physiotherapist

    Time frame: 10 weeks

  11. Box and Block test

    Time frame: 10 weeks

    Box and Block test performed by an occupational therapist

  12. Minnesota test.

    Time frame: 10 weeks

    Minnesota test performed by an occupational therapist

  13. amplitude of electrodermal responses

    Time frame: 10 weeks

    mental chronometric assessment associated with acquisition of electrodermal responses

  14. duration of electrodermal responses

    Time frame: 10 weeks

    mental chronometric assessment associated with acquisition of electrodermal responses

  15. Kinesthetic and Visual Imagery Questionnaire

    Time frame: 10 weeks

    The Kinesthetic and Visual Imagery Questionnaire (KVIQ) will allow a qualitative evaluation of the mental representation capacity of patients

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Hospices Civils de Lyon

Other

Registry information

Important dates

Study start
2013
Primary completion
2013
Study completion
2013
First posted
Aug 9, 2016
Registry last updated
May 28, 2019

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.