Hôpital Henry Gabrielle
Saint-Genis-Laval, 69230, France
NCT Number: NCT03661073
Individuals with stroke may experience sensory-motor deficit and/or neglect, with possible reduction in motor imagery ability (MI). To our knowledge, no study completely investigated MI ability in one individual whereas MI practice can be performed using visual or kinesthetic modalities (respectively visualizing with mind's eyes or imagining movement using sensation) and internal or external perspectives (performing action as spectator or as actor). This study aims to investigate MI ability in patients with stroke as compared to aged-matched healthy individuals. The investigators will assess explicit MI ability using 3 questionnaires (Movement Imagery Questionnaire-RS - MIQ-RS, Kinesthetic and Visual Imagery Questionnaire-20 - KVIQ-20, Vividness of Movement Imagery Questionnaire-2 - VMIQ-2) and 2 tests (imagined Time Up and Go - iTUG, imagined Box and Block test - iBBT). Outcome parameters will be i) the composite score of vividness measured for all tests using Likert scales, ii) the temporal equivalence between MI and Physical practice (PP - where MI/PP ratio equal to 1 indicate good MI ability and respect of temporal equivalence between MI and PP) and iii) the amplitude of electrodermal activity. The investigators will also study implicit MI ability using a hand laterality judgment task. Outcomes parameters will be response time (i.e. the duration to identify the hand laterality) and the percentage of correct responses.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–75 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Saint-Genis-Laval, 69230, France
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
For both groups:
For experimental group:
Exclusion criteria
For patients:
For healthy subjects:
The intervention will last 3 hours ± 45 minutes, the assessment will be spread over 3 sessions of 1 hour ± 15 minutes on one week. The time between two sessions will depend on patient fatigability and availability. The VMIQ-2 and the KVIQ-20 will be realized during the first session. In the second session, patients will perform the hand laterality judgment task and the MIQ-RS. During the last session the Timed up and go and the box and block test will be realized.
The intervention will last 2 hours ± 15 minutes. All the tests will be spread over 1 session. Assessment order will be VMIQ-2, KVIQ-20, the hand laterality judgment task, the after a break MIQ-RS, iTUG and iBBT.
Time frame: Day 1
Participants will self-report vividness that describe the success in imagining movements using a 5-points Likert scale (1=no image or no sensation to 5=image as clear as PP or sensation as intense as PP) for the KVIQ-20. The investigators will average the vividness for each items of the questionnaire.
Time frame: Day 1
The investigators will time the duration of physical practice (PP) and motor imagery (MI) movements, and then compute a ratio MI/PP for each item and average these ratios to get a measure of temporal equivalence for the KVIQ-20.
Time frame: Day 1
The investigators will measure amplitude of electrodermal response during actual and imagined movement. The investigators will average the amplitude of response and compute the ratio imagined/actual expressed in percent for the KVIQ-20.
Time frame: Day 1
Participants will self-report vividness that describe the success in imagining movements using a 5-points Likert scale (1=no image or no sensation to 5=image as clear as PP or sensation as intense as PP) for the VMIQ -2. The investigators will average the vividness for each items of the questionnaire.
Time frame: Day 1
The investigators will measure amplitude of electrodermal response during actual and imagined movement. The investigators will average the amplitude of response and compute the ratio imagined/actual expressed in percent for the VMIQ -2.
Time frame: Day 3
Participants will self-report vividness that describe the success in imagining movements using a 7-points Likert scale a 7-points Likert scale for MIQ (1=very difficult to imagine to 7=very easy to imagine) for the VMIQ -2. The investigators will average the vividness for each items of the questionnaire.
Time frame: Day 3
The investigators will time the duration of physical practice (PP) and motor imagery (MI) movements. Then the investigators will compute a ratio MI/PP for each item and average these ratios to get a measure of temporal equivalence for the MIQ-RS.
Time frame: Day 3
The investigators will measure amplitude of electrodermal response during actual and imagined movement. The investigators will average the amplitude of response and compute the ratio imagined/actual expressed in percent for the MIQ-RS.
Time frame: Day 3
Participant will have to identify the hand laterality of the 196 hand pictures successively displayed on a computer screen with different rotation and orientation (namely palm, back, thumb, pinky). The investigators will record the response and compute the averaged percentage of correct response.
Time frame: Day 3
Participant will have to identify the hand laterality of the 196 hand pictures successively displayed on a computer screen with different rotation and orientation (namely palm, back, thumb, pinky). The investigators will time the duration to indicate the response and compute the averaged the response time for identification.
Time frame: Day 5
Participants will self-report vividness that describe the success in imagining movements using a 5-points Likert scale (1=no image or no sensation to 5=image as clear as PP or sensation as intense as PP) for the iTUG. The investigators will average the vividness for each items of the questionnaire.
Time frame: Day 5
The investigators will time the duration of physical practice and motor imagery movements three consecutive times. Then the investigators will compute a ratio MI/PP for time and average these ratios to get a measure of temporal equivalence for the iTUG.
Time frame: Day 5
The investigators will measure amplitude of electrodermal response during actual and imagined movement. The investigators will average the amplitude of response and compute the ratio imagined/actual expressed in percent for the iTUG.
Time frame: Day 5
Participants will self-report vividness that describe the success in imagining movements using a 5-points Likert scale (1=no image or no sensation to 5=image as clear as PP or sensation as intense as PP) for the iBBT. The investigators will average the vividness for each items of the questionnaire.
Time frame: Day 5
The investigators will time the duration of physical practice and motor imagery movements three consecutive times. Then the investigators will compute a ratio MI/PP for time and average these ratios to get a measure of temporal equivalence for the iBBT.
Time frame: Day 5
The investigators will measure amplitude of electrodermal response during actual and imagined movement. The investigators will average the amplitude of response and compute the ratio imagined/actual expressed in percent for the iBBT.
Hospices Civils de Lyon
Other
Comprehensive Assessment of Motor Imagery Ability After Stroke
Acronym: AVCIM
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT02425345
Arterial Occlusive Diseases, Arteriosclerosis
View Trial DetailsNCT05589402
Bone Diseases, Brain Diseases
Harlingen, Texas, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06750692
Brain Diseases, Cardiovascular Diseases
Afyonkarahisar, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT04992195
Alzheimer Disease, Arterial Thromboembolism
Hong Kong
View Trial Details