University Hostpital Bern, Department of Neurosurgery Bern
Bern, 3010, Switzerland
Location status: Recruiting
Location contact
Katharina Lutz, MD
CONTACT
Kathleen Seidel, MD
CONTACT
NCT Number: NCT07415668
With this project, the study group wants to investigate whether a postoperative navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation (nTMS) motor map can improve stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) planning in patients who underwent resection for a brain metastasis near the primary motor cortex. Specifically, the map could allow for more precise location of motor eloquent tissue, thereby minimizing the radiation dose on these areas while preserving high radiation dose on target tissue (i.e. tumor cells).
Interested in participating?
Request Info18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Bern, 3010, Switzerland
Location status: Recruiting
Katharina Lutz, MD
CONTACT
Kathleen Seidel, MD
CONTACT
Background:
Radiation therapy is a cornerstone in the management of metastatic brain tumors. It is applied either as a first-line treatment or postoperatively to the resected tumor bed. Delivering a sufficiently high radiation dose to the lesion or tumor bed while preventing neurological deficits due to radionecrosis from overexposure of vulnerable healthy brain tissue remains particularly challenging in eloquent brain regions such as the motor cortex.
According to international guidelines (ICRU Reports 50, 62, and 83), target volumes for radiation therapy must be carefully defined, while organs at risk (OARs), including the optic apparatus, cochlea, hippocampus, brainstem, and pituitary gland, must be spared. The motor cortex (M1) and corticospinal tract (CST) should likewise be preserved; however, they are not formally defined as OARs in current guidelines, and their precise delineation is technically demanding.
The anatomical precentral gyrus ("anatomical M1") does not exactly correspond to the functional location of motor control ("functional M1"). Conventional imaging techniques such as functional MRI (fMRI) and diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) provide limited spatial accuracy, with localization errors of up to 1 cm. In contrast, navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation (nTMS) is a noninvasive method that identifies motor-eloquent regions based on individual MRI data, offering more accurate functional mapping for radiation treatment planning. This raises the question of whether integrating postoperative, pre-radiotherapy nTMS maps could enable more tailored and precise radiation therapy plans.
Previous studies have shown that nTMS demonstrates a median deviation of only 5.2 mm compared with direct cortical stimulation (the gold standard), whereas fMRI may deviate even more than 1 cm. Especially in patients with tumors involving the motor cortex, nTMS has been shown to provide superior spatial accuracy. Preliminary data further suggest that incorporating nTMS into radiotherapy planning may reduce radiation exposure to the motor cortex and CST while maintaining optimal target coverage.
However, published studies so far have relied exclusively on preoperative imaging. Postoperative anatomical changes, due to brain shift and variations in the resection cavity, can render these maps inaccurate for postoperative planning. It therefore remains to be determined whether updating nTMS maps using postoperative MRI obtained immediately before radiotherapy can enhance treatment precision and clinical outcomes.
Objective:
The objective of this study is to address the following questions in patients with resected brain metastases involving or adjacent to the motor cortex:
Methods:
The planning of SRS will be performed by a team of radiation oncologists at the Inselspital, Bern University Hospital with extensive experience in brain metastases treatment. Manual segmentations of the target volume and nTMS points will be performed. The included cases will be reviewed for the extent/dose of the treatment plan and two treatment plans will be created: a "standard" and an "nTMS-adapted" treatment plan.
For the "nTMS-adapted" plan, the nTMS motor map will be fused with the planning MRI. The motor map of each patient (regions of interest defined by the positive MEP responses) will be used to define "functional M1". The treatment dose will be prescribed to the planning target volume (Planning target volume (PTV): resection cavity plus any contrast enhancement with a 2 mm safety margin in patients with surgery). This plan will be optimized according to nTMS motor maps by reducing the dose applied to the motor eloquent tissue as low as reasonably possible by constraining the dose prescription in this area to 15 Gy in single fraction. PTV overlap with the motor maps will not be spared. The radiation oncologist selects the nTMS-adapted plan if it covers at least 95% of the target volume; otherwise, the standard plan is chosen to ensure adequate dose coverage.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Every patient will undergo a postoperative nTMS motor mapping, and both the "standard" and "nTMS-adapted" SRS plan will be created for every patient. The plan will be selected by the radiation oncologist, depending on whether at least 95% of the dose is administered to the target volume with the "nTMS-adapted" plan or not. Every patient then receives SRS.
Time frame: 5 to 2 days before SRS
Within-patient difference in maximum dose (defined as the dose received by the most exposed 0.03 cc of the tissue) to functional M1 between the standard and nTMS-adapted SRS plans, provided that both plans achieve PTV coverage ≥95% and comply with standard organ-at-risk constraints
Time frame: 5 to 2 days before SRS
Proportion of patients in whom the nTMS-adapted plan is deliverable, defined as meeting PTV coverage ≥95% and standard OAR constraints
Time frame: 5 to 2 days before SRS
Target coverage in %
Time frame: At 3, 6 and 12 month follow-up
Motor outcome (MRCS score) of each patient, at the day of nTMS (as baseline), 3, 6 and 12 months after the first radiation session
Time frame: At 3, 6 and 12 month follow-up
Motor outcome (House and Brackman) of each patient, at the day of nTMS (as baseline), 3, 6 and 12 months after the first radiation session
Time frame: At 3, 6 and 12 month follow-up
Motor outcome (results of pegboard test) of each patient, at the day of nTMS (as baseline), 3, 6 and 12 months after the first radiation session
Time frame: At 3, 6 and 12 month follow-up
Motor outcome (foot tapping test) of each patient, at the day of nTMS (as baseline), 3, 6 and 12 months after the first radiation session
Time frame: At 3, 6 and 12 month follow-up
recurrence (according to RANO) at 3, 6 and 12 months (yes/no) after first radiation
Time frame: At 3, 6, and 12 month follow-up
Quality of life via questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L)
Time frame: At 12 month follow-up
Presence of Radiation necrosis in the precentral gyrus after 1 year.
Insel Gruppe AG, University Hospital Bern
Other
Acronym: MENTOR
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT02355613
Brain Diseases, Brain Neoplasms
Rozzano, MI, Italy
View Trial DetailsNCT05474573
Brain Diseases, Brain Neoplasms
Moscow, Russia
View Trial DetailsNCT05673928
Brain Diseases, Brain Metastases
Houston, Texas, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06500455
Adenocarcinoma, Anatomic Stage IV Breast Cancer AJCC v8
Tucson, Arizona, United States
View Trial Details