University of Illinois Chicago
Chicago, Illinois, 60612, United States
NCT Number: NCT05906602
The goal of this clinical trial is to test ischemic conditioning (blood flow restriction) as a neuromodulatory technique to improve gait function in stroke. Neuromodulation is emerging as a promising adjunct strategy to facilitate changes in brain activity and improve motor behavior following a neurological injury such as stroke.
The main questions this trial aims to answer are:
* Can ischemic conditioning produce neuromodulatory changes in the lower limb primary motor cortex? * Can ischemic conditioning be used as a neuromodulatory technique to improve strength and motor control in individuals with stroke when compared to sham ischemic conditioning?
Participants will take part in two sessions of ischemic conditioning where a cuff (similar to ones that measure blood pressure) will be placed around the thigh and inflated to one of two blood flow restriction pressures (real ischemic conditioning (real IC) and sham ischemic conditioning (sham IC)). Each participant will experience measures of brain activity and motor behavior testing before and after both sessions (real IC and sham IC).
Researchers will investigate ischemic conditioning as neuromodulation modality in stroke to see if ischemic conditioning can produce beneficial changes in brain activity and improvements on subsequent motor behavior tasks.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me21 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Chicago, Illinois, 60612, United States
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
TMS General Exclusion Criteria:
IC General Exclusion Criteria:
10-minute cycles of blood flow restriction (5 minutes) followed by blood flow release (5 minutes), repeated 5 times for a total of 50 minutes.
Sham ischemic conditioning will mirror ischemic conditioning procedures, differing solely in cuff pressure during blood flow restriction to replicate to replicate perceived tightness without arterial blood flow restriction.
Time frame: Changes in corticomotor excitability will be calculated within and between sessions at baseline (Pre), immediate-post (Post), and 30-minutes-post (Post-30) one session of sham IC and real IC.
Excitability of the primary lower limb motor cortex will be assessed using single pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and motor evoked potentials (MEPs) will be recorded from the tibialis anterior muscle of the paretic leg. Higher values indicate more corticomotor excitability.
Time frame: Changes in transcallosal inhibition will be calculated within and between sessions at baseline (Pre), immediate-post (Post), and 30-minutes-post (Post-30) one session of sham IC and real IC.
Inhibition from the stimulated hemisphere to the non-stimulated hemisphere will be quantified as a measure of the ipsilateral silent period (iSP) using single pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and motor evoked potentials (MEPs) will be recorded from the tibialis anterior muscle of the leg ipsilateral to TMS stimulation. Higher values indicate more inhibition from the stimulated hemisphere to the non-stimulated hemisphere.
Time frame: Changes in ankle motor control will be calculated within and between sessions at baseline (Pre), immediate-post (Post), and 30-minutes-post (Post-30) one session of sham IC and real IC.
Reaction time will be measured using a choice reaction time task involving rapid ankle dorsiflexion and plantarflexion movements in a custom built ankle-tracking device. Lower values reflect faster reaction times. Only dorsiflexion trials were analyzed to isolate TA activation, while both directions were included to minimize anticipatory activity.
Time frame: Changes in strength will be calculated within and between sessions at baseline (Pre), immediate-post (Post), and 30-minutes-post (Post-30) one session of sham IC and real IC.
Participants will perform 3 trials each of maximum ankle dorsiflexion and plantarflexion strength. Higher values reflect more strength.
Time frame: During each real and sham ischemic conditioning session. Ratings from each session will be averaged for each participant, and the final value will represent the mean pain rating across all participants for each experimental condition.
Subjective measures of pain will be reported during ischemic conditioning and sham ischemic conditioning using a Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain). Ratings from each session will be averaged for each participant, and the final value will represent the mean pain rating across all participants for each experimental condition.
University of Illinois at Chicago
Other
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT02425345
Arterial Occlusive Diseases, Arteriosclerosis
View Trial DetailsNCT05589402
Bone Diseases, Brain Diseases
Harlingen, Texas, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06750692
Brain Diseases, Cardiovascular Diseases
Afyonkarahisar, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT04992195
Alzheimer Disease, Arterial Thromboembolism
Hong Kong
View Trial Details