Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT02177656

Motivational Interviewing Tailored Intervention for Patients With Heart Failure (MITI-HF)

This study will test the effectiveness of motivational interviewing and skill building compared to usual care to improve self-care in heart failure (HF) patients. The target population is HF patients recruited from the Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania after an in-patient admission. Patients in the intervention arms will receive one home-visit from a nurse who does a self-care intervention followed up by 3 follow-up phone calls.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104, United States

About this study

MITI-HF is a prospective, single blinded, pilot randomized single-site trial. The target sample size was 65 participants; however, to account for an estimated 35% attrition rate, the target number for recruitment was 100 participants. We calculated the target sample size based on a 2:1 randomization (intervention: control) with 90% power (5% alpha) to detect a difference of 80% versus 50% (intervention and control group) of scoring over 70, which is the cut-off for adequate self-care at three months between the two groups. The power analysis was performed using G*Power and confirmed with PASS. Randomization to the intervention or usual care group occurred after the informed consent form was signed and New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Class was scored. To achieve balance in both arms of the study, the Minim randomization program was used to minimize prognostic factor differences between groups. Minim stratified participants based on NYHA class and gender to one of two arms in a 2:1 ratio (intervention: control). The research assistants were blinded to group assignment until all study data was collected. All eligible patients were screened for health literacy using a three-question health literacy questionnaire, cognitive impairment using a six-item screener derived from the Mini Mental Status Exam (MMSE), baseline self-care using the SCHFI (v.6.2), and NYHA functional class using the Central Assessment of NYHA Functional Class. A single board-certified cardiologist scored all of the NYHA functional class scores. Medical, socio-demographic, Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ), and Heart Failure Somatic Perception Scale (HFSPS) data were collected at baseline via phone call by blinded research assistants (RA) approximately two weeks after hospital discharge. Socio-demographics were assessed using a questionnaire that inquires about gender, age, marital/partnership status, ethnicity/race, and employment. Follow-up data were collected at 90 days by the blinded RAs. If the first call was unsuccessful, the RA would try every 3 to 5 days for up to 60 days. If there was no contact with the participant after 60 days from the expected follow-up date, the participant was considered lost to follow-up. During the follow-up phone call, participants completed the SCHFI, KCCQ, HFSPS and self-reported clinical events within the study period. Self-reported clinical events were verified with a review of the electronic medical record to confirm any hospitalizations, emergency room visits, or outpatient heart failure related visits that occurred within the study period.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

To be included, participants had to be:

  • hospitalized with a primary or secondary diagnosis of heart failure
  • able to read and speak English
  • 18 years of age or older
  • living in a setting where they can independently engage in self-care
  • living within 30 miles from the University hospital
  • have at least adequate health literacy
  • symptomatic HF (NYHA II-IV)
  • willing to participate

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria

included:

  • being on a Milrinone drip
  • being on a list for an implanted ventricular assist device or heart transplant
  • pregnancy
  • psychosis
  • cognitive impairment with the inability to participate in the intervention or complete the study instruments
  • inability to provide informed consent

Study enrollment took place from January 2012 to December 2013.

Treatment and study plan

Motivational Interviewing tailored intervention

Behavioral

MI is grounded in client-centered counseling, cognitive-behavioral therapy, and social cognitive therapy. MI integrates the concepts of relationship building from humanistic therapy with active strategies oriented towards stages of change.The main characteristics of motivational interviewing are: expressing empathy, developing discrepancy, rolling with resistance, and supporting self-efficacy. The interviewer maintains a nonjudgmental approach and allows the patient to determine the need for behavioral change, rather than offering unsolicited advice on the need for change. The interviewer only explores ways to implement change once the patient expresses the desire and confidence to change. The goal of MI is to help individuals work through inherent ambivalence present in problematic or unhealthy behaviors and to help them verbally express reasons for or against change using a nonjudgmental, empathetic and encouraging tone.

Primary outcomes

  1. self-care maintenance

    Time frame: baseline, 90 days

    Self-Care will be self-reported and measured using the Self-Care of Heart Failure Index (SCHFI). Items measuring self-care maintenance address treatment adherence and self-monitoring, while management focuses on decision-making in response to symptoms. Higher scores reflect better self-care maintenance. Each scale is scored separately; the total possible score for each scale is 100.

  2. self-care management

    Time frame: baseline, 90 days

    Self-Care management will be self-reported and measured using the Self-Care of Heart Failure Index (SCHFI). Self care management is a patients ability to recognize symptoms when they occur; independent and interdependent self-care treatments implemented by the patient (e.g., take an extra diuretic for shortness of breath) and ability to evaluate the effectiveness of the treatments implemented. Higher scores reflect better self-care. Each scale is scored separately; the total possible score for each scale is 100.

  3. self-care confidence

    Time frame: baseline, 90 days

    Self-Care confidence will be self-reported and measured using the Self-Care of Heart Failure Index (SCHFI). The SCHFI captures confidence in the ability to perform self-care.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Quality of life

    Time frame: baseline and 90 days

    Quality of Life will be measured with the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ), a 23-item questionnaire that quantifies disease-specific physical limitation, symptom frequency, severity, and change over time, overall quality of life, social interference, and self-efficacy and knowledge.

  2. Somatic symptom awareness

    Time frame: baseline and 90 days

    Somatic Awareness will be measured using the 18-item HF Somatic Perception Scale (HFSAS).

  3. Hospitalizations

    Time frame: baseline and 90 days

    Hospitalizations were self-reported at 90 days and verified with the medical record.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Ruth Masterson-Creber

Other

Collaborators

  • Edna G Kynett Memorial Foundation
  • University of Pennsylvania

Registry information

Acronym: MITI-HF

Important dates

Study start
2012
Primary completion
2014
Study completion
2014
First posted
Jun 27, 2014
Registry last updated
Jun 27, 2014

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.