Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT01246349

Motivational Interviewing for Weight Loss

The investigators studied the effect of motivational interviewing (MI) on self-efficacy, health behaviors, and health outcomes in overweight children and adolescents (ages ranging from 10 to 18 years).

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Conditions

Childhood Obesity Body Weight Nutrition Disorders Nutritional and Metabolic Diseases Obesity Overnutrition Overweight Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms Pediatric Obesity Signs and Symptoms

Age range

10 year–18 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

The Hospital for Sick Children

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

About this study

One empirically supported intervention with a large evidence base for improving adult outcomes in behavioral health-related disorders is Motivational Interviewing (MI). MI is strongly rooted in the client-centered therapy of Rogers (1951). Its relational stance emphasizes the importance of understanding the client's internal frame of reference and displaying unconditional positive regard for the client. Motivational interviewing can thus be defined as a client-centered, directive method of therapy for enhancing intrinsic motivation to change by exploring and resolving ambivalence. MI manifests through specific strategies, such as reflective listening, summarization, shared decision making, and agenda setting.

Adolescent participants exposed to motivational interviewing in conjunction with usual care (diet and exercise program) are expected to endorse greater self-efficacy, report increased engagement in healthy behaviors, demonstrate a decrease in body weight and report improved psychological outcomes. While motivational interviewing has been shown to increase adults' motivation to make healthy behavior changes, few adolescent studies have demonstrated this effect.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Obese youth (with Body Mass Index (BMI) ≥ to 85th percentile for age and gender (as classified by the Center for Disease Control))
  • ages 10-18 years
  • attending a local obesity clinic ("Healthy Weights" clinic)

Time of entry into the weight-loss program was controlled for; however, both new and current participants had the option to participate in the study.

Exclusion criteria

  • taking medication whose side effects may influence weight gain or weight loss
  • did not speak English
  • demonstrated a developmental delay
  • reported being pregnant and/or reported having an eating disorder

Treatment and study plan

Motivational Interviewing (Treatment Group)

Behavioral

Motivational interviewing (MI) can be defined as a client-centered, directive method of therapy for enhancing intrinsic motivation to change by exploring and resolving ambivalence (Miller and Rollnick, 2002). MI manifests through specific strategies, such as reflective listening, summarization, shared decision making, and agenda setting.

Social Skills Training (Control Group)

Behavioral

Within the social skills training framework, advice is given to clients and sessions are focused on assigning goals for clients to work towards without specific regard for their readiness to change. The intervention is aimed at finding appropriate ways to navigate typical social situations (e.g., how to negotiate with parents).

Primary outcomes

  1. Weight Efficacy Life-style Questionnaire

    Time frame: Baseline, 6 month follow-up

    A self-efficacy instrument, the Weight Efficacy Life-style Questionnaire (WEL; Clark, Abrams, Niaura, Eaton, & Rossi, 1991) was used to measure participants' beliefs about and confidence in their own ability to make a behavior change, specifically their ability to lose weight.

    The questionnaire yields a total score, with higher scores indicating higher levels of health-related self-efficacy, as well as 5 situational sub-scores (negative emotions, availability, social pressure, physical discomfort, and positive activities). Individuals rate statements on a 10-point scale ranging from 0 (not confident) to 9 (very confident).

    The WEL is made up of 20 items (4 items per sub-scale) which are summed to obtain a total score, with the lowest total score possible being 0 and the highest 180. Only the total WEL score was used in the study's analyses.

    The difference in self-efficacy (WEL) change between treatment and control groups from baseline to a 6 month follow-up was examined.

  2. Child Dietary Self-Efficacy Scale

    Time frame: Baseline, 6 month follow-up

    A second self-efficacy scale, the Child Dietary Self-Efficacy Scale (CDSS; Parcel et al., 1995) was used to measure participants' confidence in their ability to choose lower fat, lower sodium foods.

    The questionnaire is made up of 20 likert items with 3 response options, including "not sure", "a little sure", and "very sure". Each item asks the participant to indicate how sure he/she is that they would make a healthy choice, for example, "How sure are you that you could eat cereal instead of a donut?" Individual items are scored -1, 0, or 1 and subsequently summed for a total score, with the lowest possible score a -20 and the highest a 20, whereby higher scores signify higher dietary self efficacy.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Physiological Outcomes: BMI

    Time frame: Baseline, 6 month follow-up

    The study used a Body Mass Index (BMI) percentile for age as the main indicator of weight-loss. Height and weight was measured by the pediatrician at the treatment site and BMI as well as BMI percentile for age was determined with the use of an age appropriate growth curve chart.

  2. Physiological Outcomes: Waist Circumference

    Time frame: Baseline, 6 month follow-up

    Measurements of waist circumference, an indirect measure of central adiposity (or fatness), were also obtained.

  3. Psychological Well-being

    Time frame: Change over time from Baseline to 6 months (measured monthly) with a 12 months reassessment

    Rosenberg Self-Esteem scale, Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PEDS QL), Child depression inventory, Adolescent coping (A-COPE)

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

The Hospital for Sick Children

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Motivational Interviewing as an Intervention to Increase Adolescent Self-Efficacy and Promote Weight Loss

Important dates

Study start
2010
Primary completion
2012
Study completion
2012
First posted
Nov 23, 2010
Registry last updated
Nov 17, 2017

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Related clinical trials

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.