Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT05197816

MotIoN aDaptive Deep Brain Stimulation for MSA

Patients routinely undergo deep brain stimulation (DBS) for treatment of symptoms related to neurodegenerative conditions, most commonly Parkinson's disease. In the Investigator's experience, and published evidence shows, that stimulation has effects on the autonomic nervous system. In patients undergoing therapeutic DBS for a particular subtype of Parkinsonism (Multiple System Atrophy), the effects on autonomic parameters such as blood pressure and bladder symptoms has been shown to be improved by the investigators (unpublished data). In this current study, the investigators plan to use a novel technique of adaptive DBS in order to provide stimulation dependent on patient physiological or positional factors. This is with the aim of making stimulation more responsive and patient-specific.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

55 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

John Radcliffe Hospital

Oxford, Oxfordshire, OX3 9DU, United Kingdom

About this study

Aim and patient group:

Multiple System Atrophy is a form of Parkinsonism and is a neurodegenerative condition that is characterized by gait and autonomic failure. The aim of this study is to assess the effects of aDBS of the Pedunculopontine Nucleus (PPN) on autonomic and gait symptoms in a group of 5 patients with MSA. Patients will enter our routine selection process but patients in the study will be selected for predominantly autonomic symptoms as per the inclusion criteria below. The aim is to test whether or not PPN aDBS improves quality of life, and has an effect on a variety of measurable autonomic parameters in this subset of patients. Secondary aims are to assess the safety of DBS in MSA, and to look at the structural projections and effects on brain networks associated with stimulation.

Background:

Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) is a routine treatment for movement disorders such as Parkinson's disease (PD). In Oxford, around 80 DBS operations per year are performed, and approximately two thirds of these are in patients with PD. Multiple System Atrophy (MSA) is a 'Parkinsonian' condition similar to PD and is a progressive, incurable, neurodegenerative condition characterized by a combination of Parkinsonism, ataxia, and autonomic failure. Any one of these three features may predominate, making diagnosis difficult; however, virtually all patients have autonomic dysfunction. Indeed, autonomic dysfunction is the presenting feature in half of patients that have Parkinsonism or ataxia predominant MSA. The motor manifestations such as gait problems, ataxia, and postural abnormalities are very similar to those encountered by patients with Parkinson's disease, though unfortunately are usually less responsive to dopamine agonists and so can be more disabling. Patients tend to progress more quickly, often confined to a wheelchair within 3-5 years of diagnosis, and death is usually within a decade.

Whilst DBS has sometimes been performed for the treatment of MSA, including in Oxford , the primary outcome measure is usually the motor outcome, despite the fact that the autonomic symptoms are probably the predominant factor in causing a reduced quality of life. This is because DBS is traditionally used to control motor symptoms and the exploration of its effects on autonomic function are relatively new, and pioneered by the investigators.

The most common complaints caused by autonomic dysfunction in MSA are related to orthostatic hypotension and neurogenic bladder. The former causes dizziness, fatigue and, when a severe fall in BP occurs on standing, can lead to collapse. This may be, at least in part, a cause for the numerous falls that these patients suffer. Part of the aim of this study is to look at orthostatic BP changes with and without stimulation and see whether these are improved by DBS. This may correlate with a reduction in falls, although this study is unlikely to be powered to answer this specific question. Other 'autonomic' problems include bladder dysfunction, sleep disorders, exercise intolerance and problems with thermoregulation and sweating. These will be captured using questionnaires.

Regarding the target used for DBS, a well-established target to improve gait and postural abnormalities in PD is the pedunculopontine nucleus (PPN). It has been demonstrated that the PPN is also a brain area that, when stimulated, improves bladder function in these patients. It has also been shown that PPN stimulation reduces postural fall in BP in a group of PD patients treated primarily for gait and postural problems. Whilst these studies provide a rationale for looking at similar parameters in MSA patients, this study aims to answer the question as to whether it will work for these symptoms in MSA, in addition to the motor symptoms routinely treated.

The investigators have already shown in 5 patients with MSA that these symptoms are improved with PPN DBS. The difference in this trial is the usage of a new DBS device. This is a novel device where stimulation parameters can be changed in response to changes in the patient's position, activity, or physiological parameters.

Usage of adaptive stimulation:

The investigators intend to study the usage of motion-based control of stimulation. In the current trial, the main aim is to assess the effects of DBS on gait, sleep, and blood pressure control.

In previous studies, the investigators have noted that while standing, blood pressure is increased with stimulation, as is lying blood pressure. Supine hypertension may increase the stroke risk for these patients. Furthermore, the best improvement in gait is seen with a slightly different stimulation waveform.

In order to correct for this, the investigators propose to introduce motion-based adaptive stimulation which would involve the use of an accelerometer in changing between different stimulation parameters depending on the patient's position - so delivering a different waveform for lying and standing.

Justification/importance:

A trial of DBS to assess the effect on autonomic symptomatology of MSA has never been performed. We aim to combine a five patient clinical pilot study of DBS for MSA with an investigation of the neural circuitry underpinning autonomic control.

This translational strategy is likely to lead to a larger efficacy study of DBS for MSA as well as revolutionizing neural-based treatments in other autonomic disorders such as orthostatic hypotension and pure autonomic failure.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Diagnosis of MSA with disabling autonomic symptoms
  • >6/12 in the autonomic subsection (Q9-12) of the UMSAR scale
  • Patient willing and able to give informed consent to involvement in the study.
  • Male or female aged 55 years or over
  • Able to walk (to perform gait analysis)
  • Have an anticipated prognosis > 2 years

Exclusion criteria

  • Female of child-bearing age
  • The patient is unwilling to participate or unable to give informed consent.
  • The patient has been deemed unfit for stimulator insertion by their healthcare team i.e. surgical contraindications to DBS:
  • Bleeding or coagulation disorder
  • Not fit for general anaesthetic
  • Unable to deal with implanted DBS system (turn on and off and recharging where applicable, although it is acceptable if a carer can do this)
  • Untreated anxiety or depression
  • Unable to undergo preoperative MRI (e.g. metal implants)
  • Subject is currently participating in a clinical investigation that includes an active treatment arm.

Treatment and study plan

Deep brain stimulation

Device

Electrical pulses from implanted generator that adapts to patient activity and/or physiology

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in quality of life before and after DBS measured by EuroQol-5 domains

    Time frame: Pre-operative and at 3 months after stimulation

    EQ-5D before and after DBS. Each domain score 1-5, higher is worse.

  2. Change in freezing of gait before and after DBS, measured by freezing of gait questionnaire

    Time frame: Pre-operative and at 3 months after stimulation

    Measured by Freezing of gait questionnaire (FOG) before and after DBS, Score 0-24, higher is worse.

  3. Change in the number of sleep arousals per night

    Time frame: Pre-operative and at 3 months after stimulation

    Measured by change in number of arousals on polysomnography before and after DBS

  4. Change in Cardiovascular symptoms following DBS (continuous blood pressure)

    Time frame: Pre-operative and at 3 months after stimulation

    24 hour ambulatory blood pressure recorded pre & 3 months post DBS

  5. Change in Cardiovascular symptoms pre-post DBS (change in postural blood pressure)

    Time frame: Pre-operative and at 3 months after stimulation

    Measured by tilt table blood pressure, recorded pre & 3 months post DBS

  6. Change of power in alpha bands on polysomnography before and after DBS

    Time frame: Pre-operative and at 3 months after stimulation

    Measured by change in alpha bands on polysomnography before and after DBS

  7. Change of power in beta bands on polysomnography before and after DBS

    Time frame: Pre-operative and at 3 months after stimulation

    Measured by change in beta bands on polysomnography before and after DBS

  8. Change of power in gamma bands on polysomnography before and after DBS

    Time frame: Pre-operative and at 3 months after stimulation

    Measured by change in gamma bands on polysomnography before and after DBS

Secondary outcomes

  1. Number of patients with treatment-related adverse events

    Time frame: Throughout study up to 6 months

    Documentation of adverse events from intervention

  2. Measurement of Falls frequency

    Time frame: Throughout study up to 3 months

    Falls diary

  3. Frequency and volume of bladder voiding before and after stimulation

    Time frame: Pre-operative and at 3 months after stimulation

    British association of urological surgeons bladder diary

  4. Autonomic function before and after stimulation measured by autonomic symptom profile

    Time frame: Pre-operative and at 3 months after stimulation

    Autonomic symptom profile questionnaire. Higher score is worse. Multiple sections, and composite score possible.

  5. Carer Burden before and after stimulation measured by Zarit Burden interview

    Time frame: Pre-operative and at 3 months after stimulation

    Zarit Burden interview Carer Burden Questionnaire. Score 0-88, higher is worse.

  6. MSA disease severity score before and after stimulation

    Time frame: Pre-operative and at 3 months after stimulation

    Unified MSA Rating Scale before and after stimulation. Scores 0-48 pt1, 0-56 pt2; higher is worse.

  7. Gait Analysis before and after stimulation using gaitrite mat to measure gait and step velocity and symmetry

    Time frame: Pre-operative and at 3 months after stimulation

    Gait parameters testing using Gaitrite mat

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

University of Oxford

Other

Collaborators

  • Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust

Registry information

Acronym: MINDS

Important dates

Study start
2021
Primary completion
2025
Study completion
2025
First posted
Jan 20, 2022
Registry last updated
Nov 17, 2025

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.