Karolinska Institute
Stockholm, 17176, Sweden
NCT Number: NCT00923559
Mother-infant relationship disturbances broadly comprise three areas; maternal distress, infant functional problems, and relationship difficulties. Given the high frequency of such disturbances and the relative paucity of randomized treatment studies, substantial systematic investigation is needed. This project is a randomized controlled study comparing mother-infant psychoanalytic treatment with treatment as usual in cases where mothers and/or health visitors demanded expert help.
Looking for future studies?
Notify MeUp to 18 month
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Stockholm, 17176, Sweden
DESIGN
Eighty dyads with infants below 1½ years of age were interviewed and then randomly assigned to MIP or TAU. An end-point interview followed after ½ year, evaluating the intervention effects.
The MIP treatments were performed by IPA psychoanalysts at the Infant Reception Service of the Swedish Psychoanalytic Society. TAU implied contact with a nurse at a Child Health Centre, as part of regular Swedish health care of infants and mothers. Additional treatments within the TAU framework suggested at the initiative by the health visitor or the mother were registered at the end-point interview.
INSTRUMENTS
Mother-report questionnaires; the Ages and Stages Questionnaire:Social-Emotional (ASQ:SE; Squires et al., 2002), the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS; Cox et al., 1987), the General Severity Index of the Symptom Check List-90 (Derogatis, 1994)and the Swedish Parental Questionnaire (SPSQ; Östberg et al., 1997).
Time frame: All four instruments were measured at intake interviews and six months later.
Independently rated video-taped mother-infant interactions: the Emotional Availability Scale (EAS; Biringen, 1998).
Relationship assessment: the Parent-Infant Relationship Global Assessment Scale (PIR-GAS; ZERO-TO-THREE, 2005).
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
No mothers met these criteria.
Treatment as usual (TAU) involved scheduled nurse calls at the local Child Health Centre (CHC), with paediatric checkups at 2 and 6 months of age. The nurse is encouraged to promote attachment and to detect postnatal depressions. Mothers might be offered parental groups, infant massage or guidance promoting interaction, as well as appointments with a paediatrician or a child psychiatric psychologist. Within the TAU framework, additional treatment might be initiated by the nurse or the mother. This was registered at the end-point interview.
MIP (Norman, 2001; 2004) is a psychoanalytic method adapted to the requirements of the infant as analysand in the presence of his mother. In the study, the analysts strived to recruit the baby for an emotional interchange, though this did not imply any belief that the infant would understand verbal communication. Rather, the analyst addressed the baby to help him liberate emotions consolidated in symptoms such as screaming, avoiding maternal eye contact, and breast refusal. The analyst took care in enrolling the participant mother. This was to enhance her understanding of the baby's predicament and the nature of their relation, as well as giving her space to vent her own frustration, depression and anxiety.
Time frame: Two interviews, six months apart
An observer-rated scale ranging from 0 to 99, from "documented maltreatment" to "well-adapted". Higher scores indicate a better outcome. Inter-rater reliability was measured with an external experienced infant psychotherapist.
Time frame: Two interviews, six months apart
The EPDS (Swedish translation, Lundh & Gylland, 1990), is a self-report questionnaire containing 10 items each with a 3-point scale. Range: 0 - 30. Higher scores indicate a worse outcome. It is widely used at Swedish CHCs and has been validated on samples in Sweden.
Time frame: Two interviews, six months apart
Items are mostly rated on a 4-step scale, with 0,5,10 or 15 points per item, where 0 is most optimal. There are three versions for the age ranges of this study: 3-8, 9-14, and 15-20 months. To enable comparison across age groups we report mean scores across all items. Higher scores indicate a worse outcome. Each version was independently translated into Swedish, retranslated and approved by the constructor.
Time frame: Two interviews six months apart
A Swedish-language version of the Parenting Stress Index (PSI; Abidin, 1990) with 35 items, each ranging 1-5 points. Higher scores indicate a worse outcome.
Time frame: Two interviews, six months apart
The EAS assessed video-taped mother-baby interactions of 10' duration on three maternal dimensions (Sensitivity, Structuring, Non-intrusiveness) and two infant dimensions (Responsiveness and Involvement. The raw scores of the subscales have different ranges (0-5, 0-7, and 0-9). To enable comparison across subscales, we divided scores in each subscale with its maximal score. This yielded a range for each subscale of 0-1.Thus, the total score range for all subscales was 0-1, with higher scores indicating a better outcome. Here we report results on Sensitivity.
Time frame: two assessments at six month-interval
The Symptom Check List-90 (SCL-90; Derogatis, 1994), with a Swedish language version (Fridell, Cesarec, Johansson, & Malling Thorsen, 2002), is a self-report questionnaire containing 90 items rated from 0 to 4. Higher scores indicate a worse outcome. The General Severity Index (GSI, or the mean across all items) was used to measure maternal general psychological distress.
Karolinska Institutet
Other
A Randomized Controlled Trial of Mother-Infant Psychoanalytic Treatment (MIP) and Treatment As Usual (TAU) at Child Health Centres (CHC)
Acronym: MIPPS
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.