Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT06419296

Mortality of MBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae Bacteremias with the Combined Use of Ceftazidime-avibactam and Aztreonam Vs. Other Active Antibiotics. a Multicenter Target Trial Emulation.

Ceftazidime-avibactam and aztreonam combination (CAZAVI + ATM) presents a potential alternative for the treatment of metallo-beta-lactamase (MBL)-type carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae (CPE) bacteremia, particularly where Cefiderocol is not readily available.

This study proposes a Target Trial Emulation (TTE) to assess the efficacy and safety of CAZAVI + ATM compared to other active antibiotics (OAAs) in patients with MBL-type CPE bacteremia, and also to evaluate all-cause 30-day mortality, resistance profiles of isolated microorganisms, clinical failure rates, leukocyte count normalization, adverse events, occurrence of Clostridium difficile infection, and emergence of new multidrug-resistant microorganisms.

Data will be collected through the REDCap database, with rigorous verification for completeness and accuracy.

The outcomes of this project will contribute vital insights into the efficacy and safety of CAZAVI + ATM, informing clinical practice guidelines for the management of MBL-type bacteremia across diverse settings.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Observational

Primary location

Hospital Municipal de Agudos Dr. Leónidas Lucero, Bahía Blanca, Buenos Aires, Argentina

Loading trial locations.

About this study

Patients will be categorized into two treatment groups for analysis:

CAZAVI + ATM treatment group and Other Active Antibiotics treatment group. As this study is retrospective, treatment group assignment will not be a randomized procedure. Allocation data will be collected from medical records as a dichotomous variable.

In the present study, allocation to CAZAVI + ATM or OAAs will depend on various factors such as drug availability, hospital costs, and medical criteria. Therefore, to ensure comparability among participant characteristics, baseline factors will be adjusted to mitigate indication bias.

To simulate randomization at baseline (identification of MBL-type CPE in blood samples), ensuring comparability between treatment groups, several covariates will be balanced: age, sex, comorbidities (Charlson score), Pitt score, immunosuppression with neutropenia, immunosuppression without neutropenia, days of hospitalization prior to culture, Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score, days of effective antibiotic treatment between blood culture and positivization [25]. Also, as this is a multicenter study, it will be adjusted for the characteristics of the center (public-private), including a total of 10 variables to be adjusted for.

The start of the follow-up period (Time Zero or T0) will be defined by the identification of MBL-type CPE in at least one clinical blood sample (blood culture or PCR). From this point on, all patients will be followed up. A 24-hour grace period will be considered from the identification of MBL-type CPE until the patient initiates either of the two treatment groups.

To mitigate immortality bias, the initiation of both treatment strategies will synchronize with the eligibility criteria at Time Zero of follow-up. Thus, every patient must remain alive from blood culture collection until MBL detection to be eligible for inclusion in the study, and antibiotic treatment must be initiated within 24 hours of detection. All enrolled patients will be followed until 30 days after inclusion in the study, death, or hospital discharge, whichever occurs first.

A sample calculation was performed to test the null hypothesis of equality in the proportion of deaths among patients who received CAZAVI + ATM vs. OAAs. Falcone et al. reported a 19% mortality rate 30 days after inclusion in the CAZAVI + ATM arm and a 44% mortality rate in patients with OAAs. However, for the present study we consider an 80% power is necessary to detect a clinically relevant difference of 15%, therefore we expect a mortality of 34% in the OAAs arm and 19% in the CAZAVI + ATM arm. With an alpha of 5%, two-tailed test, expected ratio CAZAVI + ATM/OAAs of 1:1, a sample size of 270 patients (135 for each branch) is calculated.

Finally, to address indication bias, an adjustment will be made with Propensity Score (PS) matching. Considering 10 confounders entered into the model, at least 10 to 20 events will be required for each variable. Therefore, as the outcome of the PS will be the CAZAVI + ATM exposure variable, at least 150 patients in the CAZAVI + ATM branch will be required. Thus,we consider the calculation of 300 patients, 150 per branch.

A meticulous data collection plan will be carried out to ensure accuracy and confidentiality of the information collected. The following procedures will be implemented:

Data source: Data will be obtained from paper or electronic medical records from each participating center. Patient tracking will be done through the bacteriology records of each hospital center.

Data recording: Variables for each patient will be uploaded to a centralized REDCap database. The principal investigator and associated investigators of each participating center will be responsible for data upload. To maintain privacy and confidentiality, each patient will receive a randomly generated registration number to anonymize their identity in the database.

Data access: Access to center-specific data will be restricted to the principal investigators. Researchers will access REDCap using personal credentials, limiting data access to authorized personnel only.

Confidentiality and anonymization: Adherence to legal provisions, such as the Argentinian National Personal Data Protection (number 25.326) and the Habeas Data, will be strictly complied with in order to protect the confidentiality and privacy of the patients involved in the study. All collected data will be anonymized, devoid of patient identifiers.

Data storage: Once the data upload is completed, the entire database will be stored under password and will only be available to the principal investigators of the study. All necessary precautions will be taken to ensure that the data are maintained in a secure and reliable environment.

The research team is dedicated to upholding data privacy, complying with legal regulations, and conducting the study ethically and responsibly.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients aged 18 years or older
  • Confirmed bacteremia by MBL-type Carbapenemase-Producing Enterobacteriaceae (CPE)
  • Initiation of effective antibiotic therapy within 24 hours of identification of MBL-type CPE and within 96 hours of blood sample.

Exclusion criteria

  • Bacteremia due to the following complicated infections:
  • Endocarditis or other endovascular infection without extractable focus.
  • Necrotizing fasciitis
  • Osteomyelitis or septic arthritis
  • Confirmed prostatitis
  • Non-drainable abscess or other unresolved infection requiring surgical intervention (e.g., cholecystitis)
  • Central nervous system infections
  • Empyema
  • Successive episodes of bacteremia by the same pathogen (with the same resistance profile) within the previous 60 days.
  • Polymicrobial bacteremias, not classified as contaminants.
  • Patients with documented allergy to beta-lactams.

Treatment and study plan

Primary outcomes

  1. All-cause mortality

    Time frame: within 30 days from the initiation of treatment (follow-up period)

    death from any cause

Secondary outcomes

  1. Describe the resistance profile of the isolated microorganisms

    Time frame: 30-day follow-up period

    including the associated enzymatic mechanisms

  2. Compare clinical failure

    Time frame: 30-day follow-up period

    presence of 1) Relapse: recurrent bacteremia due to the same bacteria; 2) Restart of antibiotic therapy targeting the same germs; 3) Local suppurative complication that was not present at the beginning of the infection; 4) Distant complications of the initial infection (defined by the growth of the same bacteria causing the initial bacteremia in distant sites)

  3. Compare the number of days to normalization of the leukocyte count in the laboratory

    Time frame: 30-day follow-up period

    (leukocyte count less than 12x109/L). (leukocyte co(leukocyte count less than 12x109/L).unt less than 12x109/L)

  4. Compare the proportion of adverse events

    Time frame: 30-day follow-up period

    including: neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, renal failure, hepatotoxicity, skin reactions and ion-losing tubulopathy

  5. compare the occurrence of Clostridium difficile infection

    Time frame: 30-day follow-up period

    Appearance of positive C. difficile toxin or positive C. difficile PCR

  6. compare the occurrence of new multidrug-resistant microorganisms

    Time frame: 30-day follow-up period

    such as KPC, NDM, VIM, IMP, OXA or EVR-producing CLD, detected in both clinical and surveillance samples

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires

Other

Registry information

Important dates

Study start
2024
Primary completion
2024
Study completion
2024
First posted
May 17, 2024
Registry last updated
Nov 21, 2024

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.