Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT04461366

Monopolar Radiofrequency Versus Pulsed Dye Laser for Treatment of Acne Scars

Background: The acne scar is a common disorder characterized by skin eruption or abnormalities on face, chest, and/or back in the adolescence which affect the cosmetic appearance.

Purpose: The main aim of this study was to investigate whether monopolar radiofrequency (MRF) or pulsed dye laser (PDL) is more effective in the cases suffering from acne scars in the form of reducing acne scars and improving the cosmetic appearance.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Conditions

Age range

19 year–23 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Radwa T Elshorbagy

Giza, 12111, Egypt

About this study

Thirty patients suffering from moderate or severe acne scars were randomly assigned into two equal groups. Group A (MRF group): received 2 sessions per week with MRF for 8 weeks. Group B (PDL group): received 1 session per week with PDL for 8 weeks. The severity of acne scars was assessed before and after treatment by using the clinical evaluation scale for acne scarring (ECCA) scale and the self-assessment of clinical acne-related scars (SCARS) scale. Quality of life and the emotional impact of acne scars were evaluated by the facial acne scar quality of life (FASQoL) scale.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients with mild to severe acne scar
  • Patients with acne scar in the face

Exclusion criteria

  • Smokers and alcohol drinker
  • Patients who had a history of diabetes, circulatory or sensory disorders
  • Patients who had a history of frequent sunburns
  • Patients with nodulocystic acne

Treatment and study plan

Monopolar radiofrequency

Device

The RF electrode was moved randomly for 30 seconds over each scar. The total duration of the treatment session is only 5 minutes for each cheek. It takes 15 minutes if the forehead and 2 cheeks are affected.

Pulsed dye laser

Device

PDL was applied for the affected areas with no pre-treatment regimens or topical anaesthetics. There was no requirement for skin cooling.

Primary outcomes

  1. acne scars severity by investigator

    Time frame: after 8 weeks of intervention

    Clinical evaluation scale for acne scarring. Using this scale, the type of scar was defined by the qualitative descriptions of scars, which is then accompanied by a numerical score (0-4) and then multiplied by (15-50) which is a weighting factor of clinical severity, the total possible score is from 0 to 540. Higher score means worse outcome while lower score means better out come.

  2. acne scars severity by the participant

    Time frame: after 8 weeks of intervention

    Self-assessment of clinical acne-related scars questionnaire. It consists of 5-items with 1 hypothesized domain which asks patients to assess acne scars severity as seen in the mirror. The total possible score is from 0- 20. Higher score means worse outcome while lower score means better out come.

Secondary outcomes

  1. emotional, social functioning and work/school effect of scars

    Time frame: after 8 weeks of intervention

    Facial acne scar quality of life scale. It is a tool formed of 10-items with 3 domains to assess the emotional, social functioning and work/school effect of scars on a 5-point rating scale The total possible score is from 0- 40. Higher score means worse outcome while lower score means better out come.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Cairo University

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Monopolar Radiofrequency Versus Pulsed Dye Laser for Treatment of Acne Scars: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Acronym: MRFPDL

Important dates

Study start
2019
Primary completion
2019
Study completion
2020
First posted
Jul 8, 2020
Registry last updated
Jul 9, 2020

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.