Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT03882047

Mometasone Furoate Aqueous (MK-0887/SCH 032088) Nasal Spray vs Placebo and FLONASE® in Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis Patients (I94-001)

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of mometasone furoate (SCH 32088) aqueous nasal spray 200 mcg once daily compared to placebo once daily in the treatment of participants with seasonal allergic rhinitis. Flonase (fluticasone propionate) nasal spray 200 mcg once daily has been chosen as the active control for this study.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • 2-year history of seasonal allergic rhinitis
  • Positive skin test response to a local seasonal allergen (current, or performed in investigator's office within the past year)
  • Good health and free of any unstable, clinically significant disease, other than allergic rhinitis, that would interfere with the study schedule or evaluation of seasonal allergic rhinitis

Exclusion criteria

  • Women who are pregnant or breastfeeding
  • Women of childbearing potential who are not using an acceptable form of birth control
  • Significant history of metabolic, cardiovascular, neurologic, hematologic, hepatic, gastrointestinal, cerebrovascular, respiratory, or renal disease, or any other disorder which, in the judgment of the investigator, could interfere with the study, or require treatment which might interfere with the study
  • Use of any chronic medication which could affect the course of seasonal allergic rhinitis
  • Asthma requiring chronic use of inhaled or systemic corticosteroids (inhaled bronchodilators are permitted for asthma treatment)
  • Current or history of frequent, clinically significant sinusitis or chronic purulent postnasal drip
  • Upper respiratory tract or sinus infection that requires antibiotic therapy within the previous 2 weeks, or a viral upper respiratory infection (URI) within the 7 days prior to Screening
  • Dependence upon nasal, oral or ocular decongestants, or nasal topical antihistamines, in the opinion of the investigator
  • Has rhinitis medicamentosa
  • Investigational drug use within the previous 30 days
  • Nasal structural abnormalities, including large nasal polyps and marked septal deviation, that significantly interfere with nasal air flow
  • Immunotherapy (desensitization therapy), unless on a stable maintenance schedule for at least one month prior to the Screening visit
  • History of multiple drug allergies, allergy to antihistamines or corticoids
  • History of psychosis, antagonistic personality, poor motivation, hypochondriasis, or any other emotional or intellectual problems that are likely to limit the validity of consent to participate in the study

Treatment and study plan

Mometasone furoate

Drug

Mometasone furoate nasal spray, 200 mg once daily

Other names: NASONEX®, MK-0887, SCH 032088

Fluticasone propionate

Drug

Fluticasone propionate nasal spray, 200 mg once daily

Other names: FLONASE®

Mometasone furoate placebo

Drug

Mometasone furoate placebo matching nasal spray, once daily

Fluticasone propionate placebo

Drug

Fluticasone propionate placebo matching nasal spray, once daily

Primary outcomes

  1. Change From Baseline in Total Nasal Symptom Score Averaged Over Day 1 Through Day 15 (Based on Participant Diaries)

    Time frame: Baseline and Day 1 through Day 15 (averaged over 15 days)

    Change from baseline averaged over study Day 1 through study Day 15 was calculated for Total Nasal Symptom Score, based on participant diaries. Participants scored 4 symptoms (rhinorrhea, stuffiness, itching, sneezing) in their diaries using the following scale: 0=none, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe. The Total Nasal Symptom Score was the sum of the 4 individual scores (range=0-12; higher score indicating more frequent/severe nasal symptoms.) Change from baseline was the 15-day average score minus the baseline score. Scores were recorded twice daily, in the morning (AM) and night (PM). Average AM/PM scores were first calculated separately, then averaged together to obtain the 15-day average score. Baseline score was an average of the 3 AM scores and 3 PM scores preceding treatment. Negative changes indicated a decrease in symptom severity.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change From Baseline in the Total Nasal Symptom Score at Day 4 (Physician Evaluation)

    Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and Day 4

    Change from baseline at Day 4 was calculated for the Total Nasal Symptom Score, as assessed by the physician. The Total Nasal Symptom Score was a composite of the following symptoms: rhinorrhea, nasal stuffiness, nasal itching, and sneezing scores. The physician scored each symptom during the study visit on the following scale: 0=none, 1=mild, 2=moderate; and 3=severe. The composite score ranged from 0-12. Change from baseline = visit score - baseline score (Day 1 visit). A negative change from baseline score indicated a decrease in symptom severity.

  2. Change From Baseline in the Total Nasal Symptom Score at Day 15 (Physician Evaluation)

    Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and Day 15

    Change from baseline at Day 15 was calculated for the Total Nasal Symptom Score, as assessed by the physician. The Total Nasal Symptom Score was a composite of the following symptoms: rhinorrhea, nasal stuffiness, nasal itching, and sneezing scores. The physician scored each symptom during the study visit on the following scale: 0=none, 1=mild, 2=moderate; and 3=severe. The composite score ranged from 0-12. Change from baseline = visit score - baseline score (Day 1 visit). A negative change from baseline score indicated a decrease in symptom severity.

  3. Change From Baseline in Overall Condition of Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis at Day 4 (Physician Evaluation)

    Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and Day 4

    Change from baseline at Day 4 was calculated for the Overall Condition of Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis, as assessed by the physician. The physician scored their overall condition on study Day 4 on the following scale: 0=none, 1=mild, 2=moderate; and 3=severe. A higher value indicated greater severity of symptoms. Change from baseline = visit score - baseline score (Day 1 visit). A negative change from baseline score indicated a decrease in symptom severity.

  4. Change From Baseline in Overall Condition of Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis at Day 15 (Physician Evaluation)

    Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and Day 15

    Change from baseline at Day 15 was calculated for the overall condition of seasonal allergic rhinitis, as assessed by the physician. The physician scored their overall condition on study Day 15 on the following scale: 0=none, 1=mild, 2=moderate; and 3=severe. A higher value indicated greater severity of symptoms. Change from baseline = visit score - baseline score (Day 1 visit). A negative change from baseline score indicated a decrease in symptom severity.

  5. Change From Baseline in Overall Condition of Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis at Day 4 (Participant Evaluation)

    Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and Day 4

    The overall condition of seasonal allergic rhinitis was evaluated by the participant on Day 4, based on the following scale: 0=none, 1=mild, 2=moderate; and 3=severe. A higher value indicated greater severity of symptoms. Change from baseline = visit score - baseline score (Day 1 visit). A negative change from baseline score indicated a decrease in symptom severity.

  6. Change From Baseline in Overall Condition of Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis at Day 15 (Participant Evaluation)

    Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and Day 15

    The overall condition of seasonal allergic rhinitis was evaluated by the participant on Day 15, based on the following scale: 0=none, 1=mild, 2=moderate; and 3=severe. A higher value indicated greater severity of symptoms. Change from baseline = visit score - baseline score (Day 1 visit). A negative change from baseline score indicated a decrease in symptom severity.

  7. Response to Therapy at Day 4 (Physician Evaluation)

    Time frame: Day 4

    Response to therapy was assessed by evaluating the participant's relief of nasal symptoms at Day 4. The physician evaluated the participant's response using the following 5-point scale: 1=complete relief, 2=marked relief, 3=moderate relief, 4=slight relief, and 5=no relief. The scores were averaged across each treatment group, with a lower score indicating a greater response to therapy and an improvement in nasal symptoms.

  8. Response to Therapy at Day 15 (Physician Evaluation)

    Time frame: Day 15

    Response to therapy was assessed by evaluating the participant's relief of nasal symptoms at Day 15. The physician evaluated the participant's response using the following 5-point scale: 1=complete relief, 2=marked relief, 3=moderate relief, 4=slight relief, and 5=no relief. The scores were averaged across each treatment group, with a lower score indicating a greater response to therapy and an improvement in nasal symptoms.

  9. Response to Therapy at Day 4 (Participant Evaluation)

    Time frame: Day 4

    Response to therapy was evaluated by participants and based upon their status scored at Day 4. Participants evaluated their response to therapy using the following 5-point scale: 1 = Complete Relief, 2 = Marked Relief, 3 = Moderate Relief, 4= Slight Relief, and 5 = Treatment Failure. The scores were averaged across each treatment group, with a lower score indicating a greater response to therapy and an improvement in nasal symptoms.

  10. Response to Therapy at Day 15 (Participant Evaluation)

    Time frame: Day 15

    Response to therapy was evaluated by participants and based upon their status scored at Day 15. Participants evaluated their response to therapy using the following 5-point scale: 1 = Complete Relief, 2 = Marked Relief, 3 = Moderate Relief, 4= Slight Relief, and 5 = Treatment Failure. The scores were averaged across each treatment group, with a lower score indicating a greater response to therapy and an improvement in nasal symptoms.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Organon and Co

Industry

Registry information

Official study title

Efficacy and Safety of Mometasone Furoate Aqueous Nasal Spray vs Placebo and Flonase® (Fluticasone Propionate) in Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis Patients (I94-001)

Important dates

Study start
1994
Primary completion
1994
Study completion
1994
First posted
Mar 20, 2019
Registry last updated
Feb 9, 2022

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.