Nethelands Cancer Institute
Amsterdam, North Holland, 1066 CX, Netherlands
NCT Number: NCT02715141
Rationale: Since January 2014 the Dutch screening programme for bowel cancer has been implemented. Screening will increase the demand for surveillance. Although patients in whom adenomas have been removed are at increased risk of progressing to cancer, solid evidence on the reduction of death from CRC through the current colonoscopy-based surveillance is lacking. Furthermore, colonoscopy-based surveillance leads to high logistic demands, high individual burden and high costs. Therefore, there is need for new surveillance strategies. Stool-based molecular testing (Cologuard®, consisting of a stool DNA test and an immunochemical assay for human hemoglobin) or Faecal Immunochemical Testing (FIT) may serve as an alternative for colonoscopy surveillance.
The aim of this study is to compare the accuracy of an established molecular stool test (Cologuard®) and FIT to colonoscopy for detection of advanced adenomas or CRC (advanced neoplasia) in a surveillance population. These outcomes will be used to model various strategies of stool-based molecular surveillance to inform health policy decisions.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me50 year–75 year
All sexes
Observational
Amsterdam, North Holland, 1066 CX, Netherlands
BACKGROUND: Since January 2014 the Dutch screening programme for colorectal carcinoma (CRC) has been implemented. Screening will increase the demand for surveillance. However, solid evidence on the reduction of death from CRC through the current colonoscopy-based surveillance is lacking. Furthermore, colonoscopy-based surveillance leads to high logistic demands, high patient burden and high costs. Therefore, there is need for new surveillance strategies. Stool-based molecular testing (Cologuard®) or Faecal Immunochemical Testing (FIT) may serve as an alternative for colonoscopy surveillance.
OBJECTIVES:
MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this prospective observational cross-sectional cohort study, individuals aged 50-75 years that are scheduled for surveillance colonoscopy will be invited to participate. They are asked to collect a whole-stool sample prior to the surveillance colonoscopy. The sample will be used to test for the presence of molecular stool markers. The results of the molecular stool test and FIT will be compared to the colonoscopy findings.
EXPECTED RESULTS: Frequent surveillance using stool-based molecular testing is more cost-effective than the current colonoscopy-based surveillance.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Collection of stool sample prior to the scheduled surveillance colonoscopy.
Time frame: Patient inclusion for the calculation of the accuracies is expected to take 2-3 years.
The accuracy (sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV) of the molecular stool test (Cologuard®) and FIT compared to colonoscopy in the detection of advanced neoplasia in a surveillance population.
Time frame: This will be calculated when all accuracy data (outcome 1) are available. This is expected to be 6 months after end of study.
Cost-effectiveness of multiple surveillance strategies, using test performance data as input in the ASCCA (Adenoma and Serrated pathway to Colorectal CAncer) model.
Time frame: This will be calculated when all accuracy data (outcome 1) are available. This is expected to be 6 months after end of study.
The ASCCA model will be used to predict outcomes, including cancer incidence and mortality, for different surveillance strategies.
Time frame: up to one month after surveillance colonoscopy
Risk factors for detecting advanced colonic neoplasia have been identified, of which the most established include gender, age, BMI, family history, physical activity, nutritional habits and smoking. Participants will be asked to complete a validated online questionnaire evaluating these risk factors.
Time frame: Analysis will be performed during the study and approximately 1 year after end of study
A challenge associated with the use of molecular markers is to find a panel of markers that represents the heterogeneity of the tumour. Therefore it is of interest to analyse whether the markers included in the Cologuard are present in the tissue of resected polyps.
Time frame: Analysis will be performed during the study and approximately 1 year after end of study
The identification of biomarkers involved in the progression from colorectal adenoma to carcinoma (progression biomarkers) could aid better risk-stratification of adenomas and thereby decrease over-diagnosis and over-treatment . As a secondary objective we will therefore analyse previously identified progression biomarkers in the tissue samples of polyps obtained during colonoscopy.
The Netherlands Cancer Institute
Other
Acronym: MOCCAS
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06068257
Breast Cancer, Breast Diseases
Orlando, Florida, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07725692
Anastomotic Leak, Colon Cancer
Alexandria, Please Select, Egypt
View Trial DetailsNCT07180303
Colonic Diseases, Colorectal Cancer
Liyang, Jiangsu, China
View Trial DetailsNCT03958747
Colonic Diseases, Colorectal Cancer
Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States
View Trial Details