Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT04714879

Modulation of Memory Consolidation in Humans

The goal of the present study is to optimize effects of slow oscillatory transcranial direct current stimulation (so-tDCS) on sleep physiology and memory consolidation in humans by combining computational and experimental human models in an iterative process. The investigator therefore works in cooperation with Prof. Dr. Klaus Obermayer (TU Berlin), who contributes computation models with the aim to mechanistically understand the impact of different perturbations on sleep-related electrophysiological features, and to subsequently optimize so-tDCS parameters for inducing SO and spindle activity.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Conditions

Age range

50 year–80 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

University medicine Greifswald

Greifswald, 17475, Germany

About this study

Sleep plays an active role in long-term consolidation of memories. Specifically, slow oscillations (SO, large amplitude waves <1 Hz) and sleep spindles (8-15 Hz), that can be measured by electroencephalography (EEG), appear to be critical for declarative memories. According to the "active system consolidation" account, newly encoded memories are reactivated during sleep, accompanied by sharp-wave ripple events (80-100 Hz) in the hippocampus, and redistributed to cortical long-term storage networks through a coordinated dialog between the hippocampus and neocortex. This dialog is supposedly mediated by a particular coupling between cortical SO and thalamo-cortical fast spindles (12-15 Hz), with spindles preferably occurring during SO up-phases, and hippocampal ripples grouped at the troughs of fast spindles. Slow spindles (8-12 Hz) are a separate kind of sleep spindle activity whose function in memory consolidation is less well understood.

Interventions targeting sleep parameters may not only make it possible to beneficially modulate a vital aspect of memory consolidation, i. e., sleep-dependent memory consolidation, but may also help to delineate which specific elements of the neural dynamics during sleep are crucial for successful consolidation.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Adults aged between 50-80 years
  • screened as healthy in a structured telephone interview

Exclusion criteria

  • Mini Mental Status Examination scores below 24
  • history of severe untreated medical, neurological, and psychiatric diseases
  • sleep disorders
  • alcohol or substance abuse
  • brain pathologies identified on MRI scan
  • intake of medication acting primarily on the central nervous system (e.g., antipsychotics, antidepressants, benzodiazepines, or any type of over-the-counter sleep-inducing drugs such as valerian),
  • nonfluent German language abilities.

Treatment and study plan

Device: anodal tDCS

Other

anodal current modulated by an oscillatory component including a fixed (0,75 Hz) versus individually adapted so-tDCS frequency with three different stimulation durations (5 min, 2 min, 30 sec)

Device: no stimulation

Other

sham stimulation

Primary outcomes

  1. Changes in EEG power (μV²) of the slow oscillation frequency band (0.5-1 Hz) following so-tDCS during sleep

    Time frame: up to 20 weeks

    Investigation whether 7 different protocols of anodal tDCS (including SHAM) lead to distinct changes in slow oscillation power

  2. Changes in EEG power (μV²) of the sleep spindles frequency band (12-15 Hz) following so-tDCS during sleep

    Time frame: up to 20 weeks

    Investigation whether 7 different protocols of anodal tDCS (including SHAM) lead to distinct changes in sleep spindle power

  3. Changes in cross-frequency coupling (resultant vector length) between slow oscillations and sleep spindles following so-tDCS during sleep

    Time frame: up to 20 weeks

    Investigation whether 7 different protocols of anodal tDCS (including SHAM) lead to distinct changes in coupling between slow oscillations and sleep spindles

Secondary outcomes

  1. Sleep architecture

    Time frame: up to 20 weeks

    Proportion of time spent in different sleep stages (in %) during the entire nap and following so-tDCS

  2. Changes in EEG power (μV²) of the delta frequency band (1-4 Hz) following so-tDCS during sleep

    Time frame: up to 20 weeks

    Investigation whether 7 different protocols of anodal tDCS (including SHAM) lead to distinct changes in delta power

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

University Medicine Greifswald

Other

Collaborators

  • Technische Universität Berlin

Registry information

Important dates

Study start
2018
Primary completion
2021
Study completion
2021
First posted
Jan 19, 2021
Registry last updated
Jun 11, 2024

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.