Modified Purandare's Cervicopexy Versus Abdominal Sacral Hysteropexy

Pelvic organ prolapse (POP), the herniation of the pelvic organs to or beyond the vaginal walls, is a common condition. Many women with prolapse experience symptoms that impact daily activities, sexual function, and exercise. The presence of POP can have a detrimental impact on body image and sexuality. Nulliparous prolapse is reported to account for 1.5% to 2% of all cases of genital prolapse . The incidence rises to 5 -8 % for young women who have delivered one or two children. As this type of prolapse occurs at a younger age, the surgical technique should not only reduce the prolapse but also retain the reproductive function. Various conservative surgeries have been described in the past, each having their own merits and de-merits .

Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) is affecting women of all ages. Epidemiological studies suggest a lifetime risk of prolapse or incontinence surgery of between 7 and 19% . In an ageing population, the incidence of these surgeries would only be expected to increase, although the increasing Caesarean Section rates and smaller family size in recent years will have a negative impact on the prevalence of these conditions. There are many approaches to the surgical correction of POP, which frequently reflect the nature and anatomical site of the defective support, but essentially the surgeon has to decide whether to perform this surgery vaginally or via the abdomen as an open or laparoscopic procedure. If performed vaginally, further decisions regarding the use of synthetic or biological graft to reinforce the repair need to be made.

The core of the modified purandare's cervicopexy is fixation of the uterine isthmus by a 25-30 cm long strip of polypropylene mesh to the rectus muscle by criss crossing using No. 1 polypropylene sutures.

Modified purandare's cervicopexy is easy to perform and provides dynamic support to the uterus, improves fertility, doesn't interfere with vaginal birth and if caesarean delivery is required doesn't damage the mesh thus reducing the recurrence of prolapse and has many advantages compared to the original operation which can favourably affect the outcome, such as: criss crossing of mesh on rectus muscle which provides a space for low transverse incision for caesarean section without compromising the mesh anchoring and retaining the support. This surgery is technically easy to perform and complications like Periosteitis, ureteric and sigmoid injuries are avoided.

Abdominal sacral hysteropexy remains a viable alternative for women undergoing pelvic reconstructive surgery who wish to retain their uteri, providing comparable rates of overall improvement and symptom change. Avoiding hysterectomy decreases the risk of mesh erosion but may increase the risk of subsequent recurrent prolapse, specifically in the anterior compartment.

Inclusion criteria

• Age : 20 years - 40 years
• BMI: 20 to 35 kg\\m2
• Any parity with desire for future pregnancy

Exclusion criteria

• 1st degree uterine prolapse.
• Previous correction of apical prolapse.
• Co-existing uterine pathology e.g. uterine fibroid .