Wuqu' Kawoq/ Maya Health Alliance
Chimaltenango, Guatemala
NCT Number: NCT05106894
Promoting optimal development for children at risk in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) is an important global health priority. Supporting caregivers to provide nurturing care is an evidence-based strategy, however feasibility of scaling-up this supporting is limited by competing demands on health workers' time. For infant development, mHealth technologies have the potential to solve this problem by providing tailored content directly to caregivers, involving and empowering them to promote infant development, promoting and facilitating interactions with health workers when areas of concern are identified and, therefore, expanding the reach of healthcare systems. This overall study is designed to explore this idea, by designing a caregiver-directed smartphone application to directly engage first-time caregivers in rural Guatemala in providing nurturing care and, after design, to conduct a prospective implementation trial of its use followed by an adequately-powered efficacy study.
Looking for future studies?
Notify MeUp to 6 month
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Chimaltenango, Guatemala
Rationale: According to recent estimates, 43% of children under age 5 residing in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs)-250 million children in total-are at risk of not reaching their developmental potential due to living in environments with malnutrition, poverty, and lack of early stimulation. Mobile health (mHealth) technology represents an efficient strategy for scaling interventions to promote infant development.
Intervention: Pilot randomized controlled trial of mHealth application compared to paper caregiving materials. Length of intervention = 6 months.
Objectives and purpose: We will test a smartphone application that will directly engage caregivers in providing nurturing care to at-risk infants. We will assess effectiveness of the mHealth application compared to paper caregiving materials by establishing effect sizes of group differences in Bayley scores after 6 months.
Study population: newborn infants.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
see arm description
see arm description
Time frame: 6 months
Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development (4th edition). Composite scores are norm-referenced based on age. Higher scores are better. Minimum composite score value is 60 and maximum composite score value is 140.
Time frame: 6 months
Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development (4th edition). Composite scores are norm-referenced based on age. Higher scores are better. Minimum composite score value is 60 and maximum composite score value is 140.
Time frame: 6 months
Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development (4th edition). Composite scores are norm-referenced based on age. Higher scores are better. Minimum composite score value is 60 and maximum composite score value is 140.
Children's Hospital Los Angeles
Other
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT04454645
Chemically-Induced Disorders, Infant Development
Newark, Delaware, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06053515
Depression, Postpartum, Depressive Disorder
College Park, Maryland, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05793112
Food Protein Induced Allergic Proctocolitis, Gut Microbiome
Newton, Massachusetts, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06230848
Infant Development, Stress
Maywood, Illinois, United States
View Trial Details