Electronic Health Record Review
OtherAncillary studies
NCT Number: NCT06112613
This clinical trial compares the use of the connected customized treatment platform (CONCURxP), consisting of using a medication monitoring device called WiseBag along with text message reminders for missed or extra medication events, to enhanced usual care (EUC), where patients only use the WiseBag, to monitor medication adherence in patients with metastatic breast cancer who are taking a CKD4/6 inhibitor. To ensure CDK4/6 inhibitors achieve their full clinical benefit, patients need to take them as prescribed, following a complex treatment schedule. Forgetfulness was the most common reason reported for medication non adherence. Using the WiseBag along with CONCURxP or enhanced usual care may improve medication adherence in patients with metastatic breast cancer who are taking a CKD4/6 inhibitor.
Interested in participating?
Request Info18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Cancer Center-Metro Medical Center Bayamon, Bayamón, Puerto Rico
PRIMARY OBJECTIVE:
I. To compare CDK4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) adherence at 12 months after completion of the baseline survey captured using electronic monitoring between the EUC (Arm A) and CONCURxP (Arm B) arms.
SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:
I. To compare CDK4/6i adherence at 12 months after completion of the baseline survey captured through self-report between the EUC (Arm A) and CONCURxP (Arm B) arms.
II. To compare CDK4/6i persistence at 12 months after completion of the baseline survey captured using electronic monitoring between the EUC (Arm A) and CONCURxP (Arm B) arms.
III. To compare symptom burden at 12 months between the EUC (Arm A) and CONCURxP (Arm B) arms.
IV. To compare quality of life at 12 months between the EUC (Arm A) and CONCURxP (Arm B) arms.
V. To compare patient-provider communication at 12 months between the EUC (Arm A) and CONCURxP (Arm B) arms.
VI. To compare self-efficacy for managing symptoms at 12 months between the EUC (Arm A) and CONCURxP (Arm B) arms.
VII. To compare financial worry at 12 months between the EUC (Arm A) and CONCURxP (Arm B) arms.
EXPLORATORY OBJECTIVES:
I. To assess longitudinal changes of patient-reported outcomes (self reported adherence, symptom burden, quality of life, and financial worry) from the EUC (Arm A) and CONCURxP (Arm B) arms.
II. To compare healthcare utilization at 12 months between the EUC (Arm A) and CONCURxP (Arm B) arms.
III. To compare progression-free survival at 12 months between the EUC (Arm A) and CONCURxP (Arm B) arms.
IV. To compare overall survival at 12 months between the EUC (Arm A) and CONCURxP (Arm B) arms.
V. To describe CONCURxP (Arm B) patients and their provider experience with various implementation outcomes.
OUTLINE: Patients are randomized into 1 of 2 arms. Non-patient participants are assigned to arm C.
ARM A: Patients use the WiseBag medication dispenser and receive access to educational materials every 4 weeks over 12 months.
ARM B: Patients use the WiseBag medication dispenser and receive personalized text message reminders, medication tracking and healthcare provider follow ups as part of the CONCURxP platform over 12 months. Patients may complete an interview over 20-30 minutes within 6 months of study completion.
ARM C: Participants complete an interview over 20-30 minutes 15-39 months post-first patient enrollment.
After completion of study intervention, patients may be followed up to 6 months.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Ancillary studies
Receive access to educational materials
Utilize the WiseBag medication dispenser
Complete an interview
Receive healthcare provider follow ups as part of the CONCURxP program
Other names: Patient Navigator Program
Ancillary studies
Receive personalized text message reminders related to their medication tracking as part of the CONCURxP program
Other names: Automated Text Message-Based Navigation, Text Message-Based Navigation
Time frame: At 12 months after initiation of medication
For each arm, mean and standard deviation (SD) adherence rates for all patients will be calculated. A two-sample t-test will be used to compare CDK4/6 inhibitor (CDK4/6i) adherence between the two arms at 12 months.
Time frame: At 3, 6, and 12 months
Using the12-item Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Medication Adherence Scale compare mean score and changes in mean scores (from baseline) at each time point between the arms using two-sample t-tests.
Time frame: At 12 months after initiation of medication
Defined as duration from CDK4/6i initiation to discontinuation of medication against medical advice, measured as the number of days from initiation until the first day of a gap that is 30 days or longer. For each arm, mean days of persistence, and the proportion of patients who discontinue the medication earlier than 12-month will be calculated and compared between the two arms using the two-sample t-test and chi-squared test, respectively.
Time frame: At baseline, 3, 6 and 12 months
Using the 16-item National-Comprehensive Cancer Network Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Breast Cancer Symptom index compare mean score and changes in mean scores (from baseline) at each time point between the arms using two-sample t-tests.
Time frame: At baseline and 12 months
Using the PROMIS-10- version (v)1.2-Global Health compare mean score and changes in mean scores (from baseline) at each time point between the arms using two-sample t-tests.
Time frame: At baseline, 3, 6, and 12 months
Using the Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems compare mean score and changes in mean scores (from baseline) at each time point between the arms using two-sample t-tests.
Time frame: At baseline, 3, 6, and12 months
Using PROMIS Item Bank v1.0 - Self-Efficacy for Managing Symptoms compare mean score and changes in mean scores (from baseline) at each time point between the arms using two-sample t-tests.
Time frame: At baseline, 3, 6, and12 months
Using the Comprehensive Score for Financial Toxicity compare mean score and changes in mean scores (from baseline) at each time point between the arms using two-sample t-tests.
Time frame: At baseline, 3, 6 and 12 months
Generalized estimating equation will be used to assess the longitudinal change over time.
Time frame: At baseline, 3, 6, and12 months
The difference of healthcare utilization between two arms will first be evaluated using the two sample t test for the continuous variables (e.g., length of stay or number of emergency department visits), and then be modeled through the regressions to allow for the control of other covariates if needed.
Time frame: At 3 and 12 months
Kaplan-Meier curves and log-rank testing will be used to visualize and compare progression free survival between the connected customized treatment platform (CONCURxP) patient group and enhanced usual care group, and Cox proportional hazards model will be fit to evaluate the impact of potential moderators on the associations of progression-free survival with arms.
Time frame: At 3 and 12 months
Kaplan-Meier curves and log-rank testing will be used to visualize and compare overall survival between the CONCURxP patient group and enhanced usual care group, and Cox proportional hazards model will be fit to evaluate the impact of potential moderators on the associations of overall survival with arms.
Time frame: Up to 12 months
We will measure portal usability using patient-reported survey and will report mean and SD. For qualitative interviews, we will use conventional content analysis methods.
Time frame: Up to 12 months
Cox proportional hazards model will be fit to evaluate the impact of potential moderators (e.g., sociodemographic, insurance, cancer variables, endocrine therapy adherence, health literacy, health belief, medical history and NCORP practice characteristics.
ECOG-ACRIN Cancer Research Group
Network
Improving Medication Adherence in Metastatic Breast Cancer Using a Connected Customized Treatment Platform (CONCURxP)
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06055881
Anatomic Stage IV Breast Cancer AJCC v8, Breast Carcinoma
Scottsdale, Arizona, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT04862585
Anatomic Stage 0 Breast Cancer AJCC v8, Anatomic Stage I Breast Cancer AJCC v8
Columbus, Ohio, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT04297384
Anatomic Stage IV Breast Cancer AJCC v8, Breast Carcinoma
Buffalo, New York, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06026657
Anatomic Stage IV Breast Cancer AJCC v8, HER2-Negative Breast Carcinoma
Columbus, Ohio, United States
View Trial Details