Peking University Third Hospital Medicial Science Research Ethics Committee
Beijing, China
NCT Number: NCT06651996
This study is a prospective, single-center trial involving 174 patients diagnosed with patellofemoral pain. The study adhered to ethical guidelines and obtained informed consent from all participants. Participants were randomly assigned to receive face-to-face remote rehabilitation guidance either 1 time, 3 times, or 6 times. The primary outcome was device-recorded training adherence, defined as cumulative total training time (hours) and mean weekly training time (hours/week) over the first 6 weeks of independent home-based telerehabilitation.Self-reported adherence was measured using the Exercise Adherence Rating Scale (EARS) at week 6 (i.e., 6 weeks after the participant completed their final face-to-face tutorial).ain intensity during daily activities and squatting at 60° was measured using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS; 0-10);7 quadriceps muscle strength (concentric and eccentric peak torque) was evaluated using isokinetic dynamometry; knee function was assessed with the Kujala Patellofemoral Score (0-100); fatigue was measured using the Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS; 9 items, 7 points each). Additionally, a closed-ended adherence survey captured participant perceptions of factors influencing adherence
Looking for future studies?
Notify MeAll sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Beijing, China
The inestigators conducted a forward-looking, single-center pilot study with a follow-up period of 8 weeks. The study recruited 174 patients diagnosed with patellofemoral pain (PFP) by a professional sports physician at the Department of Sports Medicine, Peking University Third Hospital, between June and August 2024. The study adhered to the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of Peking University Third Hospital. Although this is a pilot study, the inestigators strictly followed the CONSORT guidelines. All participants signed an informed consent form and completed home rehabilitation interventions.
Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria During the trial, an investigator not involved in the study used an electronically generated random sequence to assign patients to three groups. Two professional physical therapists (N.C and S.R) were responsible for assessing and supervising the accuracy of the project and were unaware of the grouping details.
Interventions After randomization, participants received a package containing two wearable motion sensors, a charger, resistance bands, and a manual. Additionally, the rehabilitation software provided lectures and Q&A sessions related to the condition, accessible via Android or iOS platforms. All data collected by the sensors were strictly encrypted to protect patient information and privacy. Each participant was assigned a therapist for home rehabilitation support, and a follow-up function via the software or telephone was used to remind patients who missed three remote rehabilitation sessions.
Before starting home rehabilitation, patients attended a briefing at the hospital. Participants were divided into three groups: Group 1 received 1 face-to-face remote rehabilitation tutorial (OST), Group 2 received 3 face-to-face remote rehabilitation tutorials (TST), and Group 3 received 6 face-to-face remote rehabilitation tutorials (SST). Each session lasted 40 minutes and was conducted three times a week (on Tuesday, Thursday, and Saturday). Following the briefing, patients performed home remote rehabilitation training on the same day, with each session lasting 40 minutes. The remote rehabilitation program included muscle strengthening, flexibility stretching, and movement quality training.
Primary Outcomes. The primary outcome was device-recorded training adherence, defined as cumulative total training time (hours) and mean weekly training time (hours/week) over the first 6 weeks of independent home-based telerehabilitation. Data recording commenced immediately after each participant completed his or her final face-to-face tutorial, thereby isolating adherence to the unsupervised home program. Because the three groups differed in the number of tutorials received, the calendar start date of the 6-week recording window varied: OST participants began the recording window after session 1; TST participants after session 3; and SST participants after session 6. The 6-week duration of the window was identical across groups.
Secondary Outcomes. Self-reported adherence was measured using the Exercise Adherence Rating Scale (EARS) at week 6 (i.e., 6 weeks after the participant completed their final face-to-face tutorial). The EARS comprises Section A (6 items assessing adherence to prescribed home exercise) and Section B (10 items exploring barriers to adherence). Items are rated on a 5-point Likert scale (0 = "strongly disagree" to 4 = "strongly agree"), with positively phrased items reverse scored such that higher scores indicate better adherence. The EARS has demonstrated good reliability (Cronbach α = .85) and construct validity. (Multimedia Appendix 3). Secondary engagement metrics, including frequency of question-and-answer visits and number of reminder alerts generated by the system, were recorded over the 6-week period and explored as surrogate indicators of self-management behavior but were not included in the primary adherence endpoint. Additional secondary outcomes were assessed at the 8-week endpoint: pain intensity during daily activities and squatting at 60° was measured using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS; 0-10);7 quadriceps muscle strength (concentric and eccentric peak torque) was evaluated using isokinetic dynamometry; knee function was assessed with the Kujala Patellofemoral Score (0-100); fatigue was measured using the Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS; 9 items, 7 points each). Additionally, a closed-ended adherence survey captured participant perceptions of factors influencing adherence
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
The first group participated in a face-to-face tele-rehabilitation session in the hospital on the use of sensors and rehabilitation software before the home-rehabilitation session. Thereafter, the tele-rehabilitation program included muscle strengthening, flexibility stretching, and movement quality training every Tuesday, Thursday, and Saturday.
The second group participated in three face-to-face tele-rehabilitation sessions in the hospital on the use of sensors and rehabilitation software before the home-rehabilitation session. Thereafter, the tele-rehabilitation program included muscle strengthening, flexibility stretching, and movement quality training every Tuesday, Thursday, and Saturday.
The third group participated in six face-to-face tele-rehabilitation sessions in the hospital on the use of sensors and rehabilitation software before the home-rehabilitation session. Thereafter, the tele-rehabilitation program included muscle strengthening, flexibility stretching, and movement quality training every Tuesday, Thursday, and Saturday.
Time frame: Six weeks after completion of face-to-face rehabilitation instruction
The primary outcome was device-recorded training adherence, defined as cumulative total training time (hours) and mean weekly training time (hours/week) over the first 6 weeks of independent home-based telerehabilitation. Data recording commenced immediately after each participant completed his or her final face-to-face tutorial, thereby isolating adherence to the unsupervised home program. Because the three groups differed in the number of tutorials received, the calendar start date of the 6-week recording window varied: OST participants began the recording window after session 1; TST participants after session 3; and SST participants after session 6. The 6-week duration of the window was identical across groups.
Time frame: Complete the entire 8-week rehabilitation process
Secondary outcome measures were collected at the hospital 8 weeks after the start of the study, including the severity of knee pain during daily living and squatting at 60 degrees (from 0 "no pain" to 10 "most severe") assessed on the visual analogue scale (VAS);
Time frame: Six weeks after completion of face-to-face rehabilitation instruction
Self-reported adherence was measured using the Exercise Adherence Rating Scale (EARS) at week 6 (i.e., 6 weeks after the participant completed their final face-to-face tutorial). The EARS comprises Section A (6 items assessing adherence to prescribed home exercise) and Section B (10 items exploring barriers to adherence). Items are rated on a 5-point Likert scale (0 = "strongly disagree" to 4 = "strongly agree"), with positively phrased items reverse scored such that higher scores indicate better adherence. The EARS has demonstrated good reliability (Cronbach α = .85) and construct validity.
Time frame: Complete the entire 8-week rehabilitation process
Isokinetic quadriceps femoris concentric and eccentric peak torque reflect muscle strength around the knee joint.The open-chain muscle strength of the quadriceps muscle was tested with an isokinetic muscle strength testing system (Contrex MJ) in two modes: 60°/s centripetal contraction and 60°/s centrifugal contraction. The range of the test was from 90° to 20° of knee flexion. During the test, the subjects were asked to relax as much as possible before the test, with the trunk flexed at an angle of 120°, so that the test could be performed under the reduced influence of gravity. Each contraction mode was repeated 5 times, and the interval between adjacent contraction modes was 3 minutes to rest the thigh muscles.
Time frame: Complete the entire 8-week rehabilitation process
Kujala patellofemoral score is used to evaluate the function of the knee joint (0-100, with higher scores indicating better knee function)
Time frame: Complete the entire 8-week rehabilitation process
Fatigue severity scale (FSS) is used to measure the fatigue degree of patients with various diseases and its impact on people's activities and lifestyle (9 questions in total, 7 points for each question, the higher the score, the greater the fatigue degree)
Time frame: Complete the entire 8-week rehabilitation process
Furthermore, the adherence survey collected structured responses through closed-ended questions on factors influencing telerehabilitation adherence. Response frequencies were calculated for each item
Peking University Third Hospital
Other
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07462429
Behavior, Joint Diseases
Durham, North Carolina, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07542236
Joint Diseases, Musculoskeletal Diseases
Xi'an, Shaanxi, China
View Trial DetailsNCT05576064
Anterior Knee Pain Syndrome, Congenital Abnormalities
Oswestry, United Kingdom
View Trial DetailsNCT06846125
Joint Diseases, Musculoskeletal Diseases
Lahore, Punjab Province, Pakistan
View Trial Details