Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT04420143

MLX/XLX ACR Expandable Lumbar Interbody Implants

The objective of this study is to evaluate the safety and performance of thoracic and/or lumbar spine surgery using the MLX and XLX ACR interbody implants as measured by reported complications, radiographic outcomes, and clinical patient outcomes. This study is being undertaken to identify possible residual risks and to clarify mid- to long-term clinical performance that may affect the benefit/risk ratios of the MLX and XLX ACR interbody implants.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Observational

Primary location

Orthopaedic Specialty Institute, Orange, California, United States

Loading trial locations.

About this study

Patients considered for this study will have previously undergone surgery for their spinal condition according to the standard of care of the practitioner. All patients at a given site with surgeries that meet eligibility requirements will be included in the study and available progress notes, medical records, patient-reported outcomes (PROs), radiographs, and complications will be obtained from the medical records.

The safety and performance of the MLX and XLX ACR interbody implants will be assessed using the following:

  • Complications attributable to the use of the associated interbody implant as noted in surgical summaries, progress notes, and hospital records
  • Neurologic status, symptoms, and subject self-reported clinical outcomes (e.g., pain and disability), as available
  • Radiographic outcome (fusion) and description of device status from plain film radiographs and computed tomography (CT) scan(s), as available

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients who were ≥18 years of age at the time of surgery
  • Underwent spine surgery using either MLX or XLX ACR interbody implant (NuVasive, Inc., San Diego, CA) at:
  • One or two adjacent thoracic and/or lumbar levels for degenerative disc disease or degenerative spondylolisthesis, or
  • Any number of thoracic and/or lumbar levels for degenerative scoliosis (defined as >10º coronal curve)
  • Interbody fusion with autograft and/or allograft (i.e., cancellous and/or corticocancellous allograft bone)
  • NuVasive supplemental internal fixation cleared by the applicable regulatory body for use in the thoracolumbar spine

Exclusion criteria

  • Use of any bone graft with the associated interbody implant that is not FDA-cleared for use within interbody implants.

Examples of these include:

  • Bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) (e.g., Infuse (Medtronic))
  • Synthetic bone graft extenders (e.g., AttraX (NuVasive), Formagraft (NuVasive), Mastergraft (Medtronic), Vitoss (Stryker), Actifuse (Baxter), nanOss (RTI Surgical), Fibergraft (Prosidyan/Depuy Synthes), ChronOs (Depuy Synthes))
  • Demineralized bone matrices (DBM) regulated as medical devices by the FDA (e.g., Grafton Putty/Gel (Medtronic), DBX (MTF/Depuy Synthes), Accell Evo3 (IsoTis), Propel Putty/Gel (NuVasive))
  • Peptide enhanced bone graft (e.g., iFactor (Cerapedics))
  • Previous lumbar fusion surgery at the currently treated level(s) (adjacent-level surgery is acceptable)
  • Systemic or local infection (latent or active) or signs of local inflammation documented at the time of surgery
  • Patient was involved in active litigation relating to the spine during the surgical/postoperative period (worker's compensation claim is allowed if it is not contested)
  • Inadequate bone stock or bone quality documented at the time of surgery
  • Known sensitivity to materials implanted documented at the time of surgery

Treatment and study plan

Primary outcomes

  1. Rate of Complications

    Time frame: At least three months

    Rate of complications (i.e., safety) attributable to use of the associated interbody implants (MLX or XLX ACR)

  2. Proportion of Subjects with Improvement in Neurological Symptoms

    Time frame: At least three months

    The rate of improvement as compared to baseline in preoperative neurological symptoms will be measured using a standard motor/sensory neurological exam.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Proportion of Subjects with Apparent Radiographic Fusion

    Time frame: 12 months or greater

    Proportion of subjects with apparent radiographic fusion at 12 months or greater postoperative, as imaging is available

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

NuVasive

Industry

Registry information

Official study title

An Assessment of the Safety and Performance of the MLX® Medial Lateral and XLX ACR® Expandable Lumbar Interbody Implants for the Treatment of Patients With Degenerative Conditions of the Thoracic and/or Lumbar Spine

Important dates

Study start
2020
Primary completion
2020
Study completion
2020
First posted
Jun 9, 2020
Registry last updated
Dec 22, 2025

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.