Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT06933693

Mixed Vs Blocked Search: Four Unique Tasks

The goal is to look for qualitative differences in visual search behavior when one search is performed many times in a row compared to when multiple search tasks are intermixed. Four search tasks are tested. In the Mixed condition, the four tasks are randomly changed from trial to trial. In the Blocked condition, each task is run as a block of 100 trials.

Recruiting

Interested in participating?

Request Info

Key information

Conditions

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

About this study

NOTE: This registration is linked to a Human Subjects registration in ASSIST. That, in turn, is part of an NCI Grant, R01EY017001. The grant describes many proposed experiments and notes that many others might be done as follow-up studies. At the suggestion of the NIH, the investigators grouped these studies into several "studies", each covering multiple experiments. The experiment described here is part of Aim 1 of R01EY017001. It is not possible to register a set of experiments through the PRS system in CT.gov and it is not possible to file an annual report for the grant (RPPR) without an NCT number for projects that have started collecting participants. Accordingly, the investigators are describing one experiment here that would be part of the "Project 1" bundle of studies.

When scientists study visual search in the lab, they usually ask people to do dozens of instances of the same type of task in a block. (e.g., Please find a vertical line….in the next 100 trials). However, in many (maybe most) visual searches in the real world, the participants are rarely looking for the same item (or same type of item) back-to-back. You do one search. Then the participants do another, and so on. (Find the jam. Now, find the bread. Now find a knife, etc). We want to know if the investigators would get the same results if the investigators mixed different searches together as the investigators do when the investigators test in long blocks of one specific type of search. This is important because the investigators want to know if the rules, established by years of blocked experiments, continue to apply in the more mixed real world.

There are multiple variants of this mixed/block experiment. In Experiment 1, observers are trained on four different search tasks. Then they perform 400 trials in the Mixed condition and the Blocked condition. In the Mixed condition, the four tasks are randomly changed from trial to trial. In the Blocked condition, each task is run as a block of 100 trials. Stimuli are placed in random locations in a jiggled 5 x 5 grid. The grid are placed within square field that is 0.5 of the maximum height of the screen. Each stimulus item fit into an invisible box that is 0.11 of the screen height. If the viewing distance is about 60 cm, a standard computer screen would show a stimulus field of about 15 deg on a side and each item would be placed in a box of about 3 x 3 deg. The background is white. Trials are divided evenly between three set sizes: 8, 16, and 24 items and evenly between target-present and absent trials. Stimuli are presented until the observer responds by pressing either 'p' or 'q' to indicate target present or absent, respectively. Accuracy feedback is provided after each trial.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Pass Ishihara color vision test

Exclusion criteria

  • vision less than 20/25 with correction
  • history of neuromuscular or visual disorders

Treatment and study plan

Mixed trials

Behavioral

All tasks will be randomly mixed in a single block of 400 trials.

Blocked Trials

Behavioral

Each search task will be presented in a block of trials.

Primary outcomes

  1. Response Time (RT)

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of one year

    How long it takes to respond that the target is present or absent.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Accuracy

    Time frame: through study completion, an average of one year

    The rates of false positive and false negative errors

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Cailey Tennyson, BA

CONTACT

[email protected]

617-525-3681

Jeremy M Wolfe, PhD

CONTACT

[email protected]

6178511166

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Brigham and Women's Hospital

Other

Collaborators

  • National Eye Institute (NEI)

Registry information

Official study title

Prevalence Effects in Visual Search: Theoretical and Practical Implications

Important dates

Study start
2024
Primary completion
2029
Study completion
2029
First posted
Apr 18, 2025
Registry last updated
Apr 21, 2025

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.