Brigham & Women's Hospital
Boston, Massachusetts, 02116, United States
Location status: Recruiting
Location contact
Cailey Tennyson, BA
CONTACT
Jeremy M Wolfe, PhD
CONTACT
Jeremy M Wolfe, PhD
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
NCT Number: NCT06933693
The goal is to look for qualitative differences in visual search behavior when one search is performed many times in a row compared to when multiple search tasks are intermixed. Four search tasks are tested. In the Mixed condition, the four tasks are randomly changed from trial to trial. In the Blocked condition, each task is run as a block of 100 trials.
Interested in participating?
Request Info18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Boston, Massachusetts, 02116, United States
Location status: Recruiting
Cailey Tennyson, BA
CONTACT
Jeremy M Wolfe, PhD
CONTACT
Jeremy M Wolfe, PhD
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
NOTE: This registration is linked to a Human Subjects registration in ASSIST. That, in turn, is part of an NCI Grant, R01EY017001. The grant describes many proposed experiments and notes that many others might be done as follow-up studies. At the suggestion of the NIH, the investigators grouped these studies into several "studies", each covering multiple experiments. The experiment described here is part of Aim 1 of R01EY017001. It is not possible to register a set of experiments through the PRS system in CT.gov and it is not possible to file an annual report for the grant (RPPR) without an NCT number for projects that have started collecting participants. Accordingly, the investigators are describing one experiment here that would be part of the "Project 1" bundle of studies.
When scientists study visual search in the lab, they usually ask people to do dozens of instances of the same type of task in a block. (e.g., Please find a vertical line….in the next 100 trials). However, in many (maybe most) visual searches in the real world, the participants are rarely looking for the same item (or same type of item) back-to-back. You do one search. Then the participants do another, and so on. (Find the jam. Now, find the bread. Now find a knife, etc). We want to know if the investigators would get the same results if the investigators mixed different searches together as the investigators do when the investigators test in long blocks of one specific type of search. This is important because the investigators want to know if the rules, established by years of blocked experiments, continue to apply in the more mixed real world.
There are multiple variants of this mixed/block experiment. In Experiment 1, observers are trained on four different search tasks. Then they perform 400 trials in the Mixed condition and the Blocked condition. In the Mixed condition, the four tasks are randomly changed from trial to trial. In the Blocked condition, each task is run as a block of 100 trials. Stimuli are placed in random locations in a jiggled 5 x 5 grid. The grid are placed within square field that is 0.5 of the maximum height of the screen. Each stimulus item fit into an invisible box that is 0.11 of the screen height. If the viewing distance is about 60 cm, a standard computer screen would show a stimulus field of about 15 deg on a side and each item would be placed in a box of about 3 x 3 deg. The background is white. Trials are divided evenly between three set sizes: 8, 16, and 24 items and evenly between target-present and absent trials. Stimuli are presented until the observer responds by pressing either 'p' or 'q' to indicate target present or absent, respectively. Accuracy feedback is provided after each trial.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
All tasks will be randomly mixed in a single block of 400 trials.
Each search task will be presented in a block of trials.
Time frame: Through study completion, an average of one year
How long it takes to respond that the target is present or absent.
Time frame: through study completion, an average of one year
The rates of false positive and false negative errors
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
Cailey Tennyson, BA
CONTACT
Jeremy M Wolfe, PhD
CONTACT
Brigham and Women's Hospital
Other
Prevalence Effects in Visual Search: Theoretical and Practical Implications
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06934213
Attention, Healthy
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06934148
Attention, Healthy
Newton, Massachusetts, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05419713
Vision
Louisville, Kentucky, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT04332783
Vision
Berkeley, California, United States
View Trial Details